Treatment of severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation.

BACKGROUND: Severely comminuted AO type-C3 intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius are difficult to treat. Failure to achieve and maintain nearly anatomic restoration can result in pain, instability, and poor function. We report the results of a retrospective study of the use of a standard protocol of open reduction and combined internal and external fixation of these fractures. METHODS: Seventeen of twenty-five patients treated with the protocol were available for follow-up evaluation. Six had an AO type-C3.1 fracture; eight, type-C3.2; and three, type-C3.3. Eleven fractures required a dorsal buttress plate and/or a volar buttress plate, and eleven required bone-grafting. The mean time until the external fixator was removed was seven weeks. RESULTS: At a mean of thirty months postoperatively, the mean arc of flexion-extension was 72% of that on the uninjured side and the mean grip strength was 73% of that on the uninjured side. The mean articular step-off was 1 mm, the total articular incongruity (the gap plus the step-off) averaged 2 mm, and the radial length was restored to a mean of 11 mm. Thirteen patients had less than 3 mm of total articular incongruity. Arthritis was graded as none in three patients, mild in ten, moderate in three, and severe in one. According to the Gartland and Werley demerit-point system, ten of the patients had a good or excellent result. According to the modified Green and O'Brien clinical rating system, five had a good or excellent result. One patient had a fracture collapse requiring wrist fusion, one had reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and three had minor Kirschner-wire-related problems. Total articular incongruity immediately postoperatively had a moderately strong correlation with the outcome as assessed with both clinical rating systems (r = 0.70 and 0.74 for the Gartland and Werley system and the Green and O'Brien system, respectively; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and combined internal and external fixation of AO type-C3 fractures can restore radiographic parameters to nearly normal values, maintain reduction throughout the period of fracture-healing, and provide satisfactory functional results.

The upper extremity trauma patient.

Trauma patients are predominantly young men. Urban trauma patients frequently are uninsured, and often are victims of intentionally inflicted penetrating injury, usually caused by firearms. Substance use is a common underlying factor in both urban and rural trauma. This article introduces urban and rural patients. It discusses their past medical and social histories, which are required to help the decision-making process when treating these patients.

Inflammatory and traumatic tendinopathies about the ulnar wrist.

Tendinopathy about the ulnar aspect of the wrist may involve either extensor or flexor structures and has a variety of causes. Although relatively less common than intra-articular pathology, disorders of these superficial structures must not be neglected when performing a physical examination of the ulnar wrist or developing a differential diagnosis for patients with ulnar wrist pain.

Forearm fixation.

The great majority of forearm fractures in adults are best treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Although alternative methods exist, plate fixation is favored by most surgeons. With strict attention to surgical detail, complication rates are low and early active function is possible. The treatment of high-energy, open fractures can include various techniques such as internal or external fixation. Refracture remains the greatest risk following hardware removal, which is not necessary for all patients.

Early excision of heterotopic ossification about the elbow followed by radiation therapy.

We reviewed the results, in eight patients, of excision of heterotopic ossification about the elbow performed three to ten months (average, seven months) after the initial injury and followed by radiation therapy to prevent recurrence. The etiology of the heterotopic ossification included a neurological (head or spinal cord) injury in five patients and a local injury (fracture or fracture-dislocation) of the elbow in three patients. The average preoperative arc of motion of the three joints that were capable of motion was 12 degrees (5, 10, and 20 degrees); the remaining five joints were fixed in an average of 56 degrees (range, 10 to 90 degrees) of flexion. All of the patients received a total dose of radiation of 1000 centigray, divided into five fractions. The radiation therapy was instituted on the first postoperative day, and at least three of the remaining four treatments were administered on consecutive days. Radiation therapy was not performed on the weekend, so the five fractions were administered over the course of seven days. At an average of forty-six months (range, twenty-five to seventy-two months), the arc of motion averaged 103 degrees, which compared favorably with the 121-degree arc of motion that had been attained intraoperatively. Two patients who had residual motor deficits in the involved extremity had an arc of motion of 50 and 70 degrees at the latest follow-up evaluation; those who had normal motor function fared considerably better, averaging 118 degrees of motion. There was no substantial recurrence of ossification either radiographically or that limited motion, and no complications attributable to the radiation therapy were noted. On the basis of this experience, it seems that the generally recommended twelve to eighteen-month delay between injury and excision, to allow for maturation of heterotopic bone and thus to lessen the likelihood of recurrence, may be eliminated. Additional studies are needed to define the relative risk of recurrence in the various clinical settings in which heterotopic ossification is seen and to determine whether radiation therapy is necessary to prevent recurrence after early excision in each of these instances.

Upper-extremity infections in patients seropositive for human immunodeficiency virus.

The records of 74 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients who were treated for upper-extremity infections were retrospectively reviewed. Intravenous drug use was the most common risk factor for HIV infection as well as the most common cause of the infection necessitating admission. These patients were admitted a total of 97 times for the treatment of 89 different infections and underwent 120 surgical procedures. Twenty-six infections (29%) required more than 1 operation, and 11 (12%) resulted in amputation. Twenty-seven patients who met criteria for the diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were found to be no more likely than their HIV-seropositive counterparts to be readmitted for the same diagnosis, to be treated for more than 1 infection, or to require more than 1 operation or amputation to eradicate their infection. Patients with AIDS were significantly more likely to present with spontaneous onset of infection in the absence of penetrating injury than were those who were HIV seropositive.

Complications of intercarpal arthrodesis.

Fifty patients who underwent intercarpal arthrodesis were retrospectively reviewed at an average follow-up period of 34 months. Eighteen patients had a good result, 16 results were fair, and 13 were poor. Thirty-six patients experienced some complication, and 25 patients underwent further surgical therapy: The most common indication for secondary surgery was nonunion (16 patients). Good results were significantly decreased among patients who experienced nonunion, required secondary surgery, or experienced any complication. Patients with static carpal instability treated by scaphoid trapezoid trapezium arthrodesis had a significantly greater proportion of good results.

Compression plate arthrodesis of the elbow.

We reviewed 15 patients with an arthrodesis of the elbow using an AO compression-plate technique, after an average follow-up of 24 months. The most common indication was an open, infected high-energy injury with associated bone loss. Arthrodesis was successful in all but one patient in whom severe deep infection necessitated amputation. Eight patients were treated with the metal partly exposed in an infected wound. After removal of the metal, all wounds healed secondarily and none had clinical or radiographic signs of sepsis at latest review. Compression-plate arthrodesis of the elbow is a generally applicable method that can be used even in cases of severe bone loss. There appears to be greater certainty of union than with other techniques, and no increased risk of subsequent fracture.