Vertebral Fractures in Ireland: A Sub-analysis of the DXA HIP Project.

Osteoporosis is an important global health problem resulting in fragility fractures. The vertebrae are the commonest site of fracture resulting in extreme illness burden, and having the highest associated mortality. International studies show that vertebral fractures (VF) increase in prevalence with age, similarly in men and women, but differ across different regions of the world. Ireland has one of the highest rates of hip fracture in the world but data on vertebral fractures are limited. In this study we examined the prevalence of VF and associated major risk factors, using a sample of subjects who underwent vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) performed on 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines. A total of 1296 subjects aged 40 years and older had a valid VFA report and DXA information available, including 254 men and 1042 women. Subjects had a mean age of 70 years, 805 (62%) had prior fractures, mean spine T-score was - 1.4 and mean total hip T-scores was - 1.2, while mean FRAX scores were 15.4% and 4.8% for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Although 95 (7%) had a known VF prior to scanning, 283 (22%) patients had at least 1 VF on their scan: 161 had 1, 61 had 2, and 61 had 3 or more. The prevalence of VF increased with age from 11.5% in those aged 40-49 years to > 33% among those aged ≥ 80 years. Both men and women with VF had significantly lower BMD at each measured site, and significantly higher FRAX scores, P < 0.01. These data suggest VF are common in high risk populations, particularly older men and women with low BMD, previous fractures, and at high risk of fracture. Urgent attention is needed to examine effective ways to identify those at risk and to reduce the burden of VF.

Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures are Common in Hip Fracture Patients and are Under-recognized.

INTRODUCTION: The vertebrae are the most common site for osteoporotic fracture. While they can result in disability and increased mortality, only one-third present clinically. People with multiple fractures are at greater risk of future fractures. Most hip fracture patients are neither diagnosed nor treated for their underlying osteoporosis. Computed tomography (CT) studies are often performed on hospitalised patients, can be used to diagnose osteoporosis and are gaining popularity for opportunistic osteoporosis screening by measuring BMD and other bone strength indices. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of vertebral fractures on CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) in a cohort of hip fracture patients and whether this increased their diagnosis and treatment rates. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all hip fractures admitted to our institution between 2010 and 2017 to identify those who underwent CTPA scans. An independent, blinded consultant musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the images for vertebral fractures and quantified severity using Genant criteria. Results were compared to the original radiology report, discharge diagnoses and treatment rates for osteoporosis. RESULTS: Eleven percent (225/2122) of patients had CTPA images available. Seventy percent (158) were female with a mean age of 78 years (SD: 11). The median length of stay for all patients was 16 days (1-301). Forty percent (90) of patients had at least one vertebral fracture present and 20% (46) had more than one fracture. Only one in 5 radiology reports noted the fractures. 24% of subjects had osteoporosis treatment recorded at hospital discharge and there was no difference between those with vertebral fractures to those without. CONCLUSION: Many hip fracture patients have undiagnosed spine fractures. A screening strategy which evaluates CT scans for fractures has potential to increase diagnosis and treatment rates of osteoporosis. However, more work is needed to increase awareness.

A systematic review of the Irish osteoporotic vertebral fracture literature.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures (VF) are the most common osteoporotic fracture. They are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are an important predictor of future fractures. The epidemiology of VF in Ireland is limited and a greater understanding of their scale and impact is needed. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of publications on osteoporotic VF in Ireland. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane electronic databases to identify eligible publications from Ireland addressing osteoporotic VF. RESULTS: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria out of 1558 citations. All studies were published since 2000. Data was obtained on 182,771 patients with fractures. Nine studies included more than 100 subjects and three included more than 1000. Females accounted for 70% with an overall mean age of 65.2 years (30-94). There was significant heterogeneity in study design, methods and outcome measures including the following: use of administrative claims data on public hospital admissions, surgical and medical interventions, the impact of a fracture liaison service and the osteoporosis economic burden. The prevalence of VF was difficult to ascertain due to definitions used and differences in the study populations. Only two studies systematically reviewed spine imaging using blinded assessors and validated diagnostic criteria to assess the prevalence of fractures in patient cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Several studies show that VF are common when addressed systematically and the prevalence may be rising. However, there is a deficit of large studies systematically addressing the epidemiology and their importance in Ireland.

An analysis of whiplash injury outcomes in an Irish population: a retrospective fifteen-year study of a spine surgeon's experience.

BACKGROUND: Whiplash injuries result from an acceleration-deceleration injury of the cervical spine. The associated symptoms may include neck pain/stiffness; cervicogenic headaches; interscapular pain; upper limb pain, paraesthesia and weakness. Current treatment protocols recommend conservative management of low-grade whiplash. AIMS: To assess changing practices over time in the management of whiplash-associated disorders in the practice of a specialist spine surgeon and to explore the impact of associated litigation on this patient cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: The private medical records of a specialist spine surgeon over a 15-year period (1996-2011) were reviewed. Three hundred one consecutive patients were identified: 169 females and 132 males with a mean age of 37 years ± 13. All were referred by primary care with potential soft tissue injury of the cervical spine following a road traffic accident. Fifty-eight percent had associated back pain. An initial conservative approach was adopted in all cases. Subsequently, 4 patients underwent surgical intervention. Ninety-three percent reported chronic neck pain > 6 months after their injury. Age was the only significant predictor of chronic neck pain (adjusted OR 1.29 for every 5-year increase, p = 0.03). All were ultimately involved in litigation. The establishment of the Personal Injuries Board did not influence the litigation duration during the study period. CONCLUSION: Whiplash poses a significant societal economic burden in Ireland and was associated with prolonged symptoms including neck pain and upper limb neuropathic symptoms in this cohort. Associated low-back pain was common. Litigation was linked with presentation in all cases.

Do medical students believe the back pain myths? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is common, affecting 58-84% of adults at some point. In benign cases, misinformation can lead to harmful coping strategies and prolonged recovery time. Deyo has identified seven 'Myths of Back Pain' as misconceptions commonly seen in clinical practice of which doctors-in-training should be aware. We sought to determine medical students' baseline knowledge of the prognosis and management of LBP compared to the general public and to dispel the 'Myths of Back Pain'. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study of medical students (pre-clinical and clinical) at the National University of Ireland, Galway where students completed a questionnaire outlining the seven 'Myths of Back Pain'. Final year students completed the survey before and after a seminar on LBP. Students' results were compared with a random sample of the public who attended Galway University Hospital. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen students completed the questionnaire (59% female, 41% male). The mean age was 21 years (17-32). The mean number of correct answers increased according to medical school year (premedical 3/7, first year 4/7, final year 5/7). A personal history of back pain and female sex were associated with higher scores. On average, medical students answered 4/7 questions correctly overall, compared to the public (n = 131) who averaged at 3/7. Final years dispelled one further myth after their LBP seminar. CONCLUSIONS: Common misconceptions around LBP are prevalent among medical students and the general public. It is important that medical school curricula address these issues as part of their musculoskeletal programme.