Student-led Doctor of Nursing Practice projects in the clinical environment: Viewpoint from hospital-based nurse scientists and leaders.

BACKGROUND: Exponential increases in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program enrollment have come with a rapid rise in the number of capstone projects conducted in clinical environments. However, misaligned priorities between students, faculty, and clinician leaders have created significant challenges. PURPOSE: Identify opportunities to strengthen collaboration between academic and clinical stakeholders to better support DNP projects and education. METHODS: Experienced hospital-based nurse leaders engaged in scholarly discourse supplemented by policy and research in DNP education. FINDINGS: Facilitating a DNP project requires significant investment of time, resources, and funds from the healthcare institution. Discord has arisen due to unclear responsibilities or decision-making ability for clinical stakeholders, ethical dilemmas for students who are also employees of the clinical site, and mismatched priorities between clinical need and student/academic project desires. Clinical leaders have raised significant concerns about DNP project proposals that are research-focused, diverge from healthcare institution goals, and lack a sustainability plan. DISCUSSION: Fortification of academic-practice partnerships and clarification of roles in the DNP student project are necessary to ensure that the project is of educational value to the student, a demonstration of learning for faculty, and of sustained clinical value to the healthcare system.

Arcus Experience: Bridging the Data Science Gap for Nurse Researchers.

BACKGROUND: For years, nurse researchers have been called upon to engage with "big data" in the electronic health record (EHR) by leading studies focusing on nurse-centric patient outcomes and providing clinical analysis of potential outcome indicators. However, the current gap in nurses' data science education and training pose a significant barrier. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the viability of conducting nurse-led, big-data research projects within a custom-designed computational lab and examine the support required by a team of researchers with little to no big-data experience. METHODS: Four nurse-led research teams developed a research question reliant on existing EHR data. Each team was given its own virtual computational lab populated with raw data. A data science education team provided instruction in coding languages-primarily structured query language and R-and data science techniques to organize and analyze the data. RESULTS: Three research teams have completed studies, resulting in one manuscript currently undergoing peer-review and two manuscripts in progress. The final team is performing data analysis. Four barriers and four facilitators to big-data projects were identified. DISCUSSION: As the data-science learning curve is steep, organizations need to help bridge the gap between what is currently taught in doctoral nursing programs and what is required of clinical nurse researchers to successfully engage in big-data methods. Additionally, clinical nurse researchers require protected research time and a data science infrastructure that supports novice efforts with education, mentorship, and computational lab resources.

Experiences of U.S. Nurses Compared With Nonnurses in the First Year of COVID-19: Findings From a National Registry.

BACKGROUND: Nursing professional organizations and media sources indicated early in the pandemic that the physical and psychological effects of COVID-19 might be distinct and possibly greater in nurses than in other types of healthcare workers (HCWs). OBJECTIVES: Based on survey data collected in Healthcare Worker Exposure Response and Outcomes (HERO), a national registry of U.S. HCWs, this study compared the self-reported experiences of nurses with other HCWs during the first 13 months of the pandemic. METHODS: Nurse responses were compared to responses of nonnurse HCWs in terms of viral exposure, testing and infection, access to personal protective equipment (PPE), burnout, and well-being. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between nurse and nonnurse roles for the binary end points of viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19. We also examined differences by race/ethnicity and high-risk versus low-risk practice settings. RESULTS: Of 24,343 HCWs in the registry, one third self-identified as nurses. Nurses were more likely than other HCWs to report exposure to SARS-CoV-2, problems accessing PPE, and decreased personal well-being, including burnout, feeling tired, stress, trouble sleeping, and worry. In adjusted models, nurses were more likely than nonnurse HCWs to report viral testing and test positivity for COVID-19 infection. Nurses in high-risk settings were more likely to report viral exposure and symptoms related to well-being; nurses in low-risk settings were more likely to report viral testing and test positivity. Black or Hispanic nurses were most likely to report test positivity. DISCUSSION: Differences were identified between nurses and nonnurse HCWs in access to PPE, physical and mental well-being measures, and likelihood of reporting exposure and infection. Among nurses, testing and infection differed based on race and ethnicity, and type of work setting. Our findings suggest further research and policy are needed to elucidate and address social and occupational disparities.

Advancing Opportunities for Clinical Inquiry and Professional Development During a Pandemic.

A notable challenge faced by pediatric hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic included the need to decrease inpatient census and socially distant non-clinical hospital employees to alternative work arrangements. In doing so, nurses and other clinical care services employees were reassigned to new roles, while others continue to work from home. This paper aims to describe how during the COVID-19 pandemic, a pediatric hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice used this opportunity to virtually engage staff across the department in topics of clinical inquiry through education sessions, office hours, and individualized/team consultation. Therefore, elevating and increasing the presence of nursing research and evidence-based practice while providing opportunities for the continued professional development of nurses, respiratory therapists, clinical dietitians, child life specialists and employees in neurodiagnostics.

Predictors of specialty certification among paediatric hospital nurses.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate differences in hospitals' proportion of specialty certified nurses and to determine whether and to what extent individual nurse characteristics and organisational hospital characteristics are associated with a nurse's likelihood of having specialty certification. BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown that patients in hospitals with high proportions of specialty certified nurses have better outcomes including lower mortality and fewer adverse events, yet less is known about what motivates nurses to obtain specialty certification. METHODS AND DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of paediatric nurses in 119 acute care hospitals. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the association between individual nurse characteristics, organisational hospital characteristics and an individual nurses' likelihood of holding a specialty certification. STROBE was followed. RESULTS: The proportion of certified nurses varies substantially among hospitals, with Magnet® hospitals being significantly more likely, on average, to have higher proportions of certified nurses. Nurses in children's hospitals were no more likely than paediatric nurses in general hospitals to be certified. A nurse's years of experience and bachelors-preparation were significantly associated with higher odds of having certification. The strongest predictors of certification were favourable nurse work environments and Magnet® -designation of the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: While individual attributes of the nurse were associated with a nurse's likelihood of having a specialty certification, the strongest predictors of certification were modifiable attributes of the hospital-a favourable nurse work environment and Magnet® -designation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Hospital administrators seeking to increase the proportion of specialty certified nurses in their organisation should look to improvements in the organisation's nurse work environment as a possible mechanism.

Evidence in Hand: Optimizing the Unique Skill Set of a Hospital-Based Center for Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice.

This paper describes how, as the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, one hospital-based center for nursing research and evidence-based practice capitalized on its unique skill mix to quickly pivot to provide hospital administrators and staff with timely, relevant evidence regarding the care of patients and families, as well as the protection of direct care providers and all support staff. The products produced by this center, both proactive and in direct response, contributed to clinical operations decision-making and thus, tangibly impacted practice. The positive outcomes described speak not only to the clinical environment, but also to the presence and specialized contributions of a multiprofessional center for nursing research and evidence-based practice in such a way that was not possible prior to COVID-19.

Safety and Quality of Pediatric Care in Freestanding Children's and General Hospitals.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate quality and safety of care in acute pediatric settings from the perspectives of nurses working at the bedside and to investigate hospital-level factors associated with more favorable quality and safety. METHODS: Using data from a large survey of registered nurses in 330 acute care hospitals, we described nurses' assessments of safety and quality of care in inpatient pediatric settings, including freestanding children's hospitals (FCHs) (n = 21) and general hospitals with pediatric units (n = 309). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the effects of being a FCH on favorable reports on safety and quality before and after adjusting for hospital-level and nurse characteristics and Magnet status. RESULTS: Nurses in FCHs were more likely to report favorably on quality and safety after we accounted for hospital-level and individual nurse characteristics; however, adjusting for a hospital's Magnet status rendered associations between FCHs and quality and safety insignificant. Nurses in Magnet hospitals were more likely to report favorably on quality and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety of pediatric care remain uneven; however, the organizational attributes of Magnet hospitals explain, in large part, more favorable quality and safety in FCHs compared with pediatric units in general acute care hospitals. Modifiable features of the nurse work environment common to Magnet hospitals hold promise for improving quality and safety of care. Transforming nurse work environments to keep patients safe, as recommended by the National Academy of Medicine 20 years ago, remains an unfinished agenda in pediatric inpatient settings.

Parental Uncertainty: Parents' Perceptions of Health-Related Quality of Life in Newly Diagnosed Children With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Parents of children with cancer are predisposed to psychological distress symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and uncertainty. This vulnerability may exacerbate underlying mood disturbances, including trait anxiety and depression, and influence parents' perception of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in their children. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between parental uncertainty and parent proxy reports of HRQOL in newly diagnosed children with cancer. METHODS: A longitudinal descriptive approach was used to examine the relationship between parental uncertainty and parent proxy reports of HRQOL in 55 parent-child dyads. Parental trait anxiety, depression, and perceived social support were evaluated as potential predictor variables. FINDINGS: Parents of newly diagnosed children with cancer reported lower parent proxy HRQOL scores. Parental uncertainty was prevalent and affected parents' perceptions of HRQOL three months following diagnosis; however, higher social support scores buffered these negative effects.

Predicting Pressure Injury Risk in Pediatric Patients: The Braden QD Scale.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development and initial testing of the Braden QD Scale to predict both immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injury risk in pediatric patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, prospective cohort study enrolling hospitalized patients, preterm to 21 years of age, on bedrest for at least 24 hours with a medical device in place. Receiver operating characteristic curves using scores from the first observation day were used to characterize Braden QD Scale performance, including areas under the curve (AUC) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eight centers enrolled 625 patients. A total of 86 hospital-acquired pressure injures were observed in 49 (8%) patients: 22 immobility-related pressure injuries in 14 (2%) patients and 64 medical device-related pressure injuries in 42 (7%) patients. The Braden QD Scale performed well in predicting immobility-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in the overall sample, with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI 0.73-0.84). At a cutoff score of 13, the AUC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), providing a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.92), specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.55-0.63), positive predictive value of 0.15 (95% CI 0.11-0.19), negative predictive value of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), and a positive likelihood ratio of 2.09 (95% CI 0.95-4.58). CONCLUSIONS: The Braden QD Scale reliably predicts both immobility-related and device-related pressure injuries in the pediatric acute care environment and will be helpful in monitoring care and in guiding resource use in the prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries.

Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials That Evaluate the Effectiveness of Hospital-Initiated Postdischarge Interventions on Hospital Readmission.

Under pressure to avoid readmissions, hospitals are increasingly employing hospital-initiated postdischarge interventions (HiPDI), such as home visits and follow-up phone calls, to help patients after discharge. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of HiPDI on reducing hospital readmissions using a systematic review of clinical trials published between 1990 and 2014. We analyzed twenty articles on HiPDI (from 503 reviewed abstracts) containing 7,952 index hospitalizations followed for a median 3 months (range 1-24) after discharge for readmission. The two most common HiPDI included follow-up phone calls (n = 14, 70%) or home visits (n = 11, 55%); eighty-five percent (n = 17) of studies had multiple HiPDI. In meta-analysis, exposure to HiPDI was associated with a lower likelihood of readmission (odds ratio [OR], 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-0.9]). Patients receiving ≥2 postdischarge home visits or ≥2 follow-up phone calls had the lowest likelihood of readmission (OR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4-0.8]). Hospital-initiated postdischarge interventions seem to have an effect on reducing hospital readmissions. Together, multiple home visits and follow-up phone calls may be the most effective HiPDI to reduce hospital readmission.

Clinical research nursing: a critical resource in the national research enterprise.

Translational clinical research has emerged as an important priority for the national research enterprise, with a clearly stated mandate to more quickly deliver prevention strategies, treatments and cures based on scientific innovations to the public. Within this national effort, a lack of consensus persists concerning the need for clinical nurses with expertise and specialized training in study implementation and the delivery of care to research participants. This paper reviews efforts to define and document the role of practicing nurses in implementing studies and coordinating clinical research in a variety of clinical settings, and differentiates this clinical role from the role of nurses as scientists and principal investigators. We propose an agenda for building evidence that having nurses provide and coordinate study treatments and procedures can potentially improve research efficiency, participant safety, and the quality of research data. We also provide recommendations for the development of the emerging specialty of clinical research nursing.

Perceptions of school nurses and teachers of fatigue in children.

The aim of this study was to elicit school nurses' and teachers' perceptions of fatigue in school settings. Fatigue was defined as tiredness, not relieved by usual sleep or rest; a symptom that persists beyond an isolated experience of feeling tired. Four focus groups were conducted to elicit data for this qualitative descriptive study. Purposive sampling was used to identify school nurse and teacher participants who were asked to discuss their perceptions of fatigue. Content analysis of verbatim transcripts yielded several major themes. Forty-six codes emerged from the data and were routinely applied during the analysis. Nineteen of these codes were used 20 times or more and applied to all four transcripts. Participants could clearly identify and readily discuss behaviors related to fatigue. Data describe how children attending school express fatigue in their everyday life. Findings validate the need for nurses in ambulatory pediatric settings to be aware of fatigue as a symptom that children and adolescents may experience.