ABSTRACT
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs have made large efforts to minimize the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Implementation of these programs can be challenging, since many institutions have limited resources. Utilizing resources that already exist may be beneficial, including medication reconciliation pharmacist (MRP) programs. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a MRP program on appropriateness of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment durations at hospital discharge. Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational, single-center study comparing the total days of antibiotic therapy for CAP in the preintervention period (9/2020-11/2020) versus the post-intervention period (9/2021-11/2021). Implementation of a new clinical intervention occurred between the 2 periods and included education to MRPs on appropriate CAP treatment durations and on documentation of recommendations. Data was collected utilizing a chart review of the electronic medical record of patients diagnosed with CAP using ICD-10 codes. The primary objective of this study was to compare the total days of antibiotic therapy in the pre-intervention period versus the postintervention period. Results: One-hundred fifty-five patients were included in the primary analysis. When observing total days of antibiotic therapy, there was no change from the pre-intervention period at 8 days compared to the postintervention period (P = .109). When analyzing antibiotic days of therapy at discharge, there was a decrease from 4.55 days in the preintervention period compared to 3.8 days in the post-intervention period (P = .109). The incidence of those with appropriate treatment durations, defined as 5 to 7 days of antibiotic therapy, was higher in the post-intervention period (26.5% in the pre-intervention group vs 37.9% in the post-intervention group, P = .460). Conclusions: There was a non-statistically significant decrease in median days of antimicrobial therapy for CAP at hospital discharge after implementation of a new clinical intervention targeting antibiotic days of therapy. Though median total antibiotic days of therapy were similar between both time periods, patients had an overall increase in incidence of appropriate duration of therapy, defined as 5 to 7 days, after intervention. Further studies are necessary to show how MRPs have a positive impact on improving outpatient antibiotic prescribing at hospital discharge.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with vasopressor use and development of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs). METHODS: The researchers conducted a retrospective chart review in a 12-bed medical ICU at a community hospital. A total of 123 patients who received a minimum of 24 hours of continuous vasopressor administration between January 2017 and January 2019 were included. The primary outcomes assessed were vasopressor dose and HAPI incidence, with a subgroup analysis based on type. Secondary outcomes included quantity of vasopressors, duration, mean arterial pressure, mechanical ventilation, time to injury, severity, and location. RESULTS: The overall incidence of HAPIs was 20.3%, with 17% incidence in the low-dose cohort and 22.4% in the high-dose cohort ( P = .317). There were no differences in the subgroup analysis based on vasopressor type. The most common locations for injuries were the sacrum and coccyx, with the majority being stage 1 or 2 based on the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel severity staging. No correlations were found between HAPI incidence and factors such as multiple vasopressors use, mechanical ventilation, mean arterial pressure, or duration of vasopressor administration. The documentation of time to injury was significantly shorter in the high-dose cohort compared with the low-dose cohort (157.58 vs 330.86 hours, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of HAPIs did not differ between the low- and high-dose vasopressor cohorts. However, patients who received higher doses of vasopressors had documented pressure injuries sooner than the low-dose cohort, emphasizing the importance of close monitoring for HAPIs in patients receiving vasopressors.
