Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anaesth Rep ; 10(2): e12190, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275395

ABSTRACT

Analgesia for first rib resection can be challenging with short- and long-term consequences for patients such as acute distress, difficulty participating in physiotherapy and chronic pain. We report utilising an erector spinae plane block with a continuous infusion catheter as analgesia for a transaxillary first rib removal in a patient with venous thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome). We could find no reports of erector spinae plane block in transaxillary rib resection, and a limited number of reports using a paravertebral approach to analgesia for this procedure. In our case, an erector spinae plane block provided effective analgesia, allowing the patient to participate freely in postoperative physiotherapy; no complications of erector spinae plane block were encountered. Further research into the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block for first rib resection is warranted.

2.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 22(6): 267-70, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8704836

ABSTRACT

By means of a scientific method, standard hospital mattresses were evaluated for pressure-relieving properties and patient comfort. Vendors' written materials and product demonstrations led to the initial selection of seven mattresses. On the basis of findings from a survey of staff nurses and environmental services and pressure readings obtained with three healthy volunteers, three mattresses were selected for intensive evaluation. Eighteen mattresses (six of each type) were placed in six clinical care units; at 2-week intervals, interface pressure readings (occipital, sacral, and heel) were performed on patients by means of a computerized measurement system. Caregiver and patient questionnaires (n = 100) were analyzed for clinical significance and patients' responses. We conclude that there are no significant differences among the three mattresses tested in pressure-reducing capabilities, nursing functions, or patient comfort.


Subject(s)
Beds/standards , Decision Making , Pressure Ulcer/nursing , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Beds/supply & distribution , Humans , Pressure , Purchasing, Hospital , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...