The injury experience of the competitive athlete with a disability: prevention implications.

The purpose of this project was to describe the injury experiences of athletes with disabilities. A cross-disability instrument was developed to measure variables of interest. A retrospective survey was administered to 426 athletes who participated at the 1989 national competition of the National Wheelchair Athletic Association (NWAA), United States Association for Blind Athletes (USABA), and the United States Cerebral Palsy Athletic Association (USCPAA). The definition of injury was any trauma to the participant that occurred during any practice, training, or competition session that caused the athlete to stop, limit, or modify participation for 1 d or more. Thirty-two percent (N = 137) of the total respondents reported at least one time-loss injury. By organization, 26% of the total injuries were from the NWAA and 37% were from the USABA and USCPAA, respectively. The shoulder and arm/elbow accounted for 57% of the total NWAA injuries. Fifty-three percent of the injuries to the USABA athlete were to the lower extremity. Injuries to the USCPAA athlete were distributed among four body locations, knee (21%), shoulder (16%), forearm/wrist (16%), and leg/ankle (15%). The athlete with a disability demonstrated approximately the same percentage of injury as the athlete without a disability in similar sport activities. Biomechanical considerations of locomotion and specific sport skills should be analyzed by experts to reduce the percentage of injuries.

Reimbursement issues in clinical oncology.

In this multidisciplinary review, health-care specialists present practical solutions to the dilemma of rising costs v the need for adequate medical care for all Americans. The United States is the only advanced industrial society that makes ability to pay a critical determinant in health care. As the costs of patient care and insurance coverage escalate, the public demands greater value in insurance coverage with enhanced access to adequate care, clinical trials, and experimental therapies. Greater cooperation is needed between third-party payers, business, and government to create a system that provides optimal care today while supporting innovation and emerging technology for the future.

Sports medicine and the physiology of wheelchair marathon racing.

In the past three decades, wheelchair sports have become an international reality. Disabled athletes are exercising their right to accept the challenges and risks taken by able-bodied athletes. Marathon racing over a 26-mile, 385-yard course is the latest and most strenuous of the wheelchair athletic events. The small amount of available research data on wheelchair sports has been summarized, as well as some relevant data from exercise physiology studies on able-bodied subjects. Physicians and other health professionals who work with disabled people should be knowledgeable about the risks and benefits of wheelchair sports. Much more basic research is needed to improve the safety, training techniques, and performance of wheelchair athletes.

Comparison of two systems for stroke rehabilitation in a general hospital.

This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation therapy in a specialized Stroke Unit with that provided on the medical service of a general hospital (Rhode Island Hospital). The 8-bed Stroke Unit is staffed by a multidisciplinary team, and a weekly conference is held for evaluation and planning. On the basis of data obtained from the hospital records, two groups of patients were studied: 224 who were treated in the Stroke Unit, and 110 who were evaluated and approved for admission to the Unit but were not accommodated. A rigid "first come, first served" policy for admission to the Unit was observed. Hypothesis testing was performed with reference to the patient's medical condition, socioeconomic status, demographic characteristics, and difficulties during hospital stay to determine whether the groups were comparable. A patient was considered to have improved if his condition decreased in severity between the time of admission to therapy and the time of discharge. Severity was rated as: mild (level one), moderate (level two), severe (level three), and profound (level four). No significant difference in rehabilitation results was found between the two treatment systems at severity levels two (moderate) and four (profound). However, the Stroke Unit attained significantly better results with level-three patients (severe stroke). This group received more sessions of physical therapy and remained in the hospital longer than did the level-three patients treated on the general medical service. Physicians referred patients selectively to the Stroke Unit, althoug the Unit had no policy of screening patients for admission, and this may have had some influence on the achievement of better results with level-three patients. Level-four patients did not do well in either setting.