Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 29(17): 3192-6, 2011 Apr 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21354481

ABSTRACT

School nurses in the United Kingdom are largely responsible for delivering the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to 12-13 year old girls. In order to assess the impact of HPV vaccination on school nurses' roles, we gave a questionnaire to all 33 school nurses who offered Cervarix ™ in two Primary Care Trusts one year ahead of the national vaccine programme. Key organisational issues raised by the school nurses were the size of the team and its skill mix. A few found their schools uncooperative and were dissatisfied with mechanisms for problem resolution. On average, nurses spent an additional 69 h (0.80 h per child) on vaccine-related activities. In semi-qualitative interviews (n=17), school nurses complained of work overload and described the difficulties of establishing good relationships with some of their schools. Nurses expected schools to take some responsibility for ensuring good uptake and were frustrated when help was not forthcoming. We conclude that variation in uptake between schools in part reflects a difficult relationship with the school nurse which may be attributed to characteristics of the school, schools' attitudes towards health interventions, organisational problems, multiple school nurse roles and/or personal ability. Some of these issues will need to be addressed to ensure continued high vaccine coverage as HPV vaccination becomes a less prioritised, routine activity.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Female , Humans , School Nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
2.
Vaccine ; 28(25): 4210-4, 2010 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20399829

ABSTRACT

Pre-adolescent girls who have been successfully immunised against human papillomavirus (HPV) may have relatively little knowledge about cervical cancer. A questionnaire was sent to 1084 girls approximately 6 months after they had been offered vaccination to assess whether an educational film had influenced their vaccine decision and what information they recalled. Girls who viewed the film were more likely to have wanted the vaccine than non-viewers (p=0.015), but only 42% of them could recall details of the film 6 months later. Fear of cervical cancer may motivate young adolescents for vaccination but false assumptions might undermine later preventive actions by both the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.


Subject(s)
Mental Recall , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Patient Education as Topic , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaccination/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Parents , Students/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
3.
BMC Public Health ; 9: 254, 2009 Jul 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19622145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the UK, parental consent for the routine vaccination of 12-13 year olds schoolgirls against human papillomavirus (HPV) is recommended, although legally girls may be able to consent themselves. As part of a vaccine study conducted ahead of the National HPV Vaccine Programme we sought the views of school nurses on vaccinating girls who did not have parental consent. METHODS: HPV vaccination was offered to all 12 year old girls attending schools in two Primary Care Trusts in Greater Manchester. At the end of the study semi-structured, tape-recorded interviews were conducted with school nurses who had delivered the vaccine (Cervarix). The interview template was based on concepts derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Transcripts were analysed thematically in order to understand school nurses' intentions to implement vaccination based on an assessment of Gillick competency. RESULTS: School nurses knew how to assess the competency of under-16s but were still unwilling to vaccinate if parents had refused permission. If parents had not returned the consent form, school nurses were willing to contact parents, and also to negotiate with parents who had refused consent. They seemed unaware that parental involvement required the child's consent to avoid breaking confidentiality. Nurses' attitudes were influenced by the young appearance and age of the school year group rather than an individual's level of maturity. They were also confused about the legal guidelines governing consent. School nurses acknowledged the child's right to vaccination and strongly supported prevention of HPV infection but ultimately believed that it was the parents' right to give consent. Most were themselves parents and shared other parents' concerns about the vaccine's novelty and unknown long-term side effects. Rather than vaccinate without parental consent, school nurses would defer vaccination. CONCLUSION: Health providers have a duty of care to girls for whom no parental consent for HPV vaccination has been given, and in the UK, this includes conducting, and acting upon, an assessment of the maturity and competence of an adolescent minor. To facilitate this, policies, training and support structures for health providers should be implemented.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Parental Consent , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Alphapapillomavirus/immunology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Female , Humans , Nurse-Patient Relations , School Nursing , Self Efficacy
5.
Hum Vaccin ; 5(2): 85-91, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18758242

ABSTRACT

Asplenic individuals are at increased risk of infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae. The immune response to pneumococcal conjugate vaccine has not been investigated in this clinical risk group. We investigated immune responses to pneumococcal vaccination in asplenic individuals. Eligible subjects aged > or =4 years received one dose 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) and, if no prior 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) had been received within previous 5 years, one dose was given 6 months following PCV7. Pre- and post-vaccination blood samples were taken. Pneumococcal serotype-specific IgG levels were determined for 9 serotypes; the 7 in PCV7 plus serotypes1 and by standardized ELISA. One hundred and eleven asplenic individuals were recruited [median age 54.8 years, (18.1-81.8)]. Median age at splenectomy was 29.6 years (3.6-78.3); 108 (97.3%) individuals had previously received PPV23. Compliance with UK recommendations on immunization and prophylaxis in this group was poor, 91 (82%) subjects had received Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine and only 68 (62%) had received meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine. In total 61 (55%) subjects were taking antibiotic prophylaxis and 12 subjects had reported previous invasive pneumococcal disease, five episodes of which occurred post-splenectomy. High serotype-specific IgG concentrations were observed pre-PCV7, with significant increases (p < 0.01) in geometric mean concentrations pre- to post-PCV7 for the PCV7 serotypes. Post-PCV7, between 27% (serotype 14) and 69% (serotype 23F) of subjects had a > or =2-fold rise in IgG. Pre-PCV7, the percentage of individuals with levels > or =0.35 microg/mL ranged between 77% (serotype 4) and 97% (serotypes 14, 19F), whilst post-PCV7 this was 90% (serotype 6B) and 99% (serotype 14). No significant increases were observed post-PPV23. Asplenic individuals responded well to PCV7, though protective levels were demonstrated pre-PCV7 in majority of participants due to prior PPV23. Although immunogenic, there is insufficient evidence here to recommend routine PCV7 immunization over PPV23 immunization in adult asplenic individuals.


Subject(s)
Pneumococcal Vaccines/immunology , Splenectomy/adverse effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine , Humans , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Male , Middle Aged , United Kingdom , Young Adult
6.
BMJ ; 336(7652): 1056-8, 2008 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18436917

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to adolescent girls. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: 36 secondary schools in two primary care trusts in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: 2817 schoolgirls in year 8 (12 and 13 year olds). INTERVENTION: Delivery of the bivalent vaccine at 0, 1, and 6 months over one school year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaccine uptake for doses 1 and 2 of a three dose schedule. RESULTS: Vaccine uptake was 70.6% (1989/2817) for the first dose and 68.5% (1930/2817) for the second dose. Uptake was significantly lower in schools with a higher proportion of ethnic minority girls (P<0.001 for trend) or higher proportion of girls entitled to free school meals (P=0.029 for trend). The main reason for parents' refusal of vaccination was insufficient information about the vaccine and its long term safety. Maintaining the vaccine schedule was challenging as 16.3% (dose 1) and 23.6% (dose 2) of girls missed their vaccination day and had to be offered alternative appointments. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Delivery of the first two doses of HPV vaccine to adolescent schoolgirls is encouraging, but the success of the vaccination programme depends on high coverage for the third dose.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Delivery of Health Care , England , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , School Health Services , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
7.
Lancet ; 367(9520): 1394-5; author reply 1395-6, 2006 Apr 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16650642
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL