Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Strength Cond Res ; 26(12): 3237-42, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22344053

ABSTRACT

Plyometrics are a popular form of training the stretch-shortening cycle in competitive athletes and recreational athletes. One method of controlling intensity is to vary the dropping height during the training session. It may be possible to alter the intensity by creating a target height to jump over when holding the dropping height constant. Fifteen college recreational athletes performed 15 trials of 60-cm depth jumps over 3 different target heights (40, 60, and 80 cm). One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in kinematic and kinetic variables for both the concentric and eccentric phases. There were no significant differences in eccentric work found between the 3 conditions. Significant differences were found in the total work performed during the concentric portion of the jumps between the 40- and 60-cm trials but not between the 60- and 80-cm trials. These results were found to be different at each joint of the lower extremity as compared with past research. Power analysis showed no significant differences between target heights, which may suggest that higher target heights may not be necessary to achieve the same ground contact parameters. Overall analysis of the variables suggests that 60 cm is an adequate target height when dropping from 60 cm.


Subject(s)
Leg/physiology , Plyometric Exercise/methods , Analysis of Variance , Biomechanical Phenomena , Humans , Male , Task Performance and Analysis , Torque , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...