Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 17 de 17
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Cell Stem Cell ; 12(4): 440-52, 2013 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23499385

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms through which cell-cycle control and cell-fate decisions are coordinated in proliferating stem cell populations are largely unknown. Here, we show that E2f3 isoforms, which control cell-cycle progression in cooperation with the retinoblastoma protein (pRb), have critical effects during developmental and adult neurogenesis. Loss of either E2f3 isoform disrupts Sox2 gene regulation and the balance between precursor maintenance and differentiation in the developing cortex. Both isoforms target the Sox2 locus to maintain baseline levels of Sox2 expression but antagonistically regulate Sox2 levels to instruct fate choices. E2f3-mediated regulation of Sox2 and precursor cell fate extends to the adult brain, where E2f3a loss results in defects in hippocampal neurogenesis and memory formation. Our results demonstrate a mechanism by which E2f3a and E2f3b differentially regulate Sox2 dosage in neural precursors, a finding that may have broad implications for the regulation of diverse stem cell populations.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle , E2F3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Neural Stem Cells/cytology , Neural Stem Cells/metabolism , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics , Aging/metabolism , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Count , Cell Cycle/genetics , Cell Lineage/genetics , Cell Proliferation , Embryo, Mammalian/cytology , Embryo, Mammalian/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Mice , Models, Biological , Molecular Sequence Data , Neurogenesis , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/metabolism
2.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 21(9): 903-10, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23340514

ABSTRACT

While the importance of intrafamilial communication of hereditary cancer risk has been acknowledged, the factors that promote and act as barriers to patients disclosing their information to their families are complex and emerging. This raises the question: How are patients guided in practice to contemplate intrafamilial communication? Focusing on breast cancer, we conducted an exploratory study examining current resources supporting patients and health-care professionals, and isolated the messages surrounding intrafamilial communication of cancer risk. We find the duty for health-care professionals to counsel patients regarding intrafamilial communication is acknowledged to varying degrees by multiple actors in the cancer care delivery landscape, including health-care professional associations, health service organizations, and patient groups. A range of medical, psychosocial, and other factors underlying intrafamilial communication are acknowledged in messages to patients. Patients, however, are often referred to a single group of health-care professionals to discuss their diverse and complex needs. At the same time, messages aimed at patients appear to place the emphasis on barriers that could exist for patients contemplating intrafamilial communication, while highlighting the benefits families derive from such communication. Taken together, this points to a lack of coherence within materials directed to patients and suggests the need to do coordinated research among stakeholders to address two related issues: (1) determining who are the actors best positioned to send messages surrounding intrafamilial communication to patients and (2) addressing the content of messages conveyed in patient materials.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Family Relations , Truth Disclosure , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Family Health , Female , Genetic Counseling , Genetic Testing , Humans , Patient Education as Topic , Risk Factors
3.
J Community Genet ; 4(2): 203-14, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23275181

ABSTRACT

The primary goal of breast and ovarian cancer screening is to minimize the cases of advanced disease and therefore its mortality rate. For hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, one method to reach this goal is to disseminate genetic risk information among family members. However, experience tells us that this information does not always reach family members in a timely manner, if at all. There are many moving parts to a decision to disclose genetic risk information within a family, and the lack of detail and cohesion in current guidelines do a disservice to hereditary breast cancer prevention. Utilizing legal, medical, and policy databases for literature, case law and policy documents relating to communication of genetic test results within families, as well as a consultative process with representative stakeholders, a points to consider has been developed to address a number of issues that might impact the ability and willingness of patients to inform family members of genetic risk. These include: what is "genetic information"; who is the "family"; why should patients inform their family members; and how should health professionals be involved in this process? This represents only an initial step towards fostering better communication within families. Additional research is needed to determine the best methods for encouraging this communication and motivations for disclosing or not and to promote the development of a solution, considering the complexity of human relationships and the probabilistic nature of genetic information.

4.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 21(2): 143-7, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22781088

ABSTRACT

Personalized medicine promises that an individual's genetic information will be increasingly used to prioritize access to health care. Use of genetic information to inform medical decision making, however, raises questions as to whether such use could be inequitable. Using breast cancer genetic risk prediction models as an example, on the surface clinical use of genetic information is consistent with the tools provided by evidence-based medicine, representing a means to equitably distribute limited health-care resources. However, at present, given limitations inherent to the tools themselves, and the mechanisms surrounding their implementation, it becomes clear that reliance on an individual's genetic information as part of medical decision making could serve as a vehicle through which disparities are perpetuated under public and private health-care delivery models. The potential for inequities arising from using genetic information to determine access to health care has been rarely discussed. Yet, it raises legal and ethical questions distinct from those raised surrounding genetic discrimination in employment or access to private insurance. Given the increasing role personalized medicine is forecast to play in the provision of health care, addressing a broader view of what constitutes genetic discrimination, one that occurs along a continuum and includes inequitable access, will be needed during the implementation of new applications based on individual genetic profiles. Only by anticipating and addressing the potential for inequitable access to health care occurring from using genetic information will we move closer to realizing the goal of personalized medicine: to improve the health of individuals.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Health Services Accessibility , Precision Medicine/ethics , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/ethics , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , Health Services Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans
5.
J Neurosci ; 32(24): 8219-30, 2012 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699903

ABSTRACT

During brain morphogenesis, the mechanisms through which the cell cycle machinery integrates with differentiation signals remain elusive. Here we show that the Rb/E2F pathway regulates key aspects of differentiation and migration through direct control of the Dlx1 and Dlx2 homeodomain proteins, required for interneuron specification. Rb deficiency results in a dramatic reduction of Dlx1 and Dlx2 gene expression manifested by loss of interneuron subtypes and severe migration defects in the mouse brain. The Rb/E2F pathway modulates Dlx1/Dlx2 regulation through direct interaction with a Dlx forebrain-specific enhancer, I12b, and the Dlx1/Dlx2 proximal promoter regions, through repressor E2F sites both in vitro and in vivo. In the absence of Rb, we demonstrate that repressor E2Fs inhibit Dlx transcription at the Dlx1/Dlx2 promoters and Dlx1/2-I12b enhancer to suppress differentiation. Our findings support a model whereby the cell cycle machinery not only controls cell division but also modulates neuronal differentiation and migration through direct regulation of the Dlx1/Dlx2 bigene cluster during embryonic development.


Subject(s)
E2F Transcription Factors/physiology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/physiology , Homeodomain Proteins/biosynthesis , Neurogenesis/physiology , Retinoblastoma Protein/physiology , Transcription Factors/biosynthesis , Animals , Brain/growth & development , Brain/physiology , Cell Count/methods , Female , Interneurons/physiology , Male , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Mice, Transgenic , Pregnancy , Signal Transduction/physiology
6.
J Law Med Ethics ; 39(4): 605-13, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22084846

ABSTRACT

Research now provides participants greater indications of genetic risk for disease, even for conditions incidental to the research study. Given this development, should such information also be disclosed to the family of research participants? There has been some indication at the national level that genetic risk information can be disclosed to participants' families; however, limited attention has been given to returning research results to family. Thus, we have also incorporated the discussion surrounding the disclosure of genetic risk discovered in the clinic (e.g., genetic testing). A number of important questions are examined: Should genetic research results be provided to family? Are there differences between clinical and research findings that would prevent research results from being disclosed to family? Who should make the disclosure, if in fact it is done at all? We conclude by noting that the return of results is increasingly accepted as technology permits the discovery of more and more medically useful data. However, debates of whether results should be returned to participants must first be settled before moving to familial disclosure.


Subject(s)
Disclosure/ethics , Family , Genetic Research , Genetic Testing , Genetic Privacy/ethics , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Internationality
7.
Mol Cell Biol ; 31(2): 238-47, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21059867

ABSTRACT

The Rb/E2F pathway has long been appreciated for its role in regulating cell cycle progression. Emerging evidence indicates that it also influences physiological events beyond regulation of the cell cycle. We have previously described a requirement for Rb/E2F mediating neuronal migration; however, the molecular mechanisms remain unknown, making this an ideal system to identify Rb/E2F-mediated atypical gene regulation in vivo. Here, we report that Rb regulates the expression of neogenin, a gene encoding a receptor involved in cell migration and axon guidance. Rb is capable of repressing E2F-mediated neogenin expression while E2F3 occupies a region containing E2F consensus sites on the neogenin promoter in native chromatin. Absence of Rb results in aberrant neuronal migration and adhesion in response to netrin-1, a known ligand for neogenin. Increased expression of neogenin through ex vivo electroporation results in impaired neuronal migration similar to that detected in forebrain-specific Rb deficiency. These findings show direct regulation of neogenin by the Rb/E2F pathway and demonstrate that regulation of neogenin expression is required for neural precursor migration. These studies identify a novel mechanism through which Rb regulates transcription of a gene beyond the classical E2F targets to regulate events distinct from cell cycle progression.


Subject(s)
Cell Movement/physiology , E2F3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/physiology , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Animals , Cell Adhesion/physiology , E2F3 Transcription Factor/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Nerve Growth Factors/genetics , Nerve Growth Factors/metabolism , Netrin-1 , Neurons/cytology , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Prosencephalon/anatomy & histology , Prosencephalon/embryology , Prosencephalon/metabolism , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics , Transcription, Genetic , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism
8.
Mol Cell Biol ; 29(17): 4701-13, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19564414

ABSTRACT

We have previously shown that p107, a member of the retinoblastoma (Rb) cell cycle regulatory family, has a unique function in regulating the pool of neural precursor cells. As the pool of progenitors is regulated by a limiting supply of trophic factors, we asked if the Rb/E2F pathway may control the size of the progenitor population by regulating the levels of growth factors or their receptors. Here, we demonstrate that fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) is aberrantly upregulated in the brains of animals lacking Rb family proteins and that the gene encoding the FGF2 ligand is directly regulated by p107 and E2F3. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays demonstrated that E2F3 and p107 occupy E2F consensus sites on the FGF2 promoter in the context of native chromatin. To evaluate the physiological consequence of FGF2 deregulation in both p107 and E2F3 mutants, we measured neural progenitor responsiveness to growth factors. Our results demonstrate that E2F3 and p107 are each mediators of FGF2 growth factor responsiveness in neural progenitor cells. These results support a model whereby p107 regulates the pool of FGF-responsive progenitors by directly regulating FGF2 gene expression in vivo. By identifying novel roles for p107/E2F in regulating genes outside of the classical cell cycle machinery targets, we uncover a new mechanism whereby Rb/E2F mediates proliferation through regulating growth factor responsiveness.


Subject(s)
E2F3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/metabolism , Neurons/physiology , Signal Transduction/physiology , Stem Cells/physiology , Animals , Base Sequence , Cell Proliferation , Cells, Cultured , E2F3 Transcription Factor/genetics , Female , Fibroblast Growth Factor 2/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Humans , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Molecular Sequence Data , Neurons/cytology , Pregnancy , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Retinoblastoma Protein/genetics , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Retinoblastoma-Like Protein p107/genetics , Retinoblastoma-Like Protein p107/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Stem Cells/cytology
9.
Cell Cycle ; 6(23): 2917-27, 2007 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17993781

ABSTRACT

E2Fs have been historically considered as key interacting factors for the retinoblastoma (Rb) family of pocket proteins, acting as universal regulators of cell cycle progression. Often exhibiting overlapping function, deregulated E2F activity is thought to cancer or cell death. While early reports hypothesized that E2Fs may be capable of regulating distinct functions beyond proliferation, several recent reports have characterized increasingly diverse, context dependent functions for different E2Fs in vivo, often in what appears to a manner beyond traditional cell cycle regulation. Ironically, many of these new functions are still mediated through the classical cell cycle regulatory Rb family of interacting factors. Here we review the recent advances, focusing on differentiation and development, to emphasize that E2F function is likely more complex than the simple model suggests, capable of exhibiting both specificity of function, and roles beyond cell cycle progression in vivo.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle , Cell Differentiation , E2F Transcription Factors/physiology , Animals , Chromatin , Humans , Retinoblastoma Protein
10.
J Neurosci ; 27(22): 5926-35, 2007 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17537963

ABSTRACT

Early forebrain development is characterized by extensive proliferation of neural precursors coupled with complex structural transformations; however, little is known regarding the mechanisms by which these processes are integrated. Here, we show that deficiency of the cell cycle regulatory protein, E2F4, results in the loss of ventral telencephalic structures and impaired self-renewal of neural precursor cells. The mechanism underlying aberrant ventral patterning lies in a dramatic loss of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) expression specifically in this region. The E2F4-deficient phenotype can be recapitulated by interbreeding mice heterozygous for E2F4 with those lacking one allele of Shh, suggesting a genetic interaction between these pathways. Treatment of E2F4-deficient cells with a Hh agonist rescues stem cell self-renewal and cells expressing the homeodomain proteins that specify the ventral telencephalic structures. Finally, we show that E2F4 deficiency results in impaired activity of Shh forebrain-specific enhancers. In conclusion, these studies establish a novel requirement for the cell cycle regulatory protein, E2F4, in the development of the ventral telencephalon.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle/physiology , E2F4 Transcription Factor/physiology , Telencephalon/embryology , Telencephalon/metabolism , Animals , Cells, Cultured , E2F4 Transcription Factor/deficiency , Female , Mice , Mice, Inbred C3H , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Transgenic , Pregnancy , Telencephalon/cytology , Telencephalon/growth & development
11.
J Cell Biol ; 178(1): 129-39, 2007 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17591923

ABSTRACT

The Retinoblastoma protein p107 regulates the neural precursor pool in both the developing and adult brain. As p107-deficient mice exhibit enhanced levels of Hes1, we questioned whether p107 regulates neural precursor self-renewal through the repression of Hes1. p107 represses transcription at the Hes1 promoter. Despite an expanded neural precursor population, p107-null mice exhibit a striking reduction in the number of cortical neurons. Hes1 deficiency rescues neurosphere numbers in p107-null embryos. We find that the loss of a single Hes1 allele in vivo restores the number of neural precursor cells at the ventricular zone. Neuronal birthdating analysis reveals a dramatic reduction in the rate of neurogenesis, demonstrating impairment in p107(-/-) progenitors to commit to a neuronal fate. The loss of a single Hes1 allele restores the number of newly generated neurons in p107-deficient brains. Together, we identify a novel function for p107 in promoting neural progenitor commitment to a neuronal fate.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Neurons/metabolism , Retinoblastoma-Like Protein p107/deficiency , Stem Cells/metabolism , Alleles , Animals , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/genetics , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors/metabolism , Cerebral Cortex/cytology , Embryo, Mammalian , Homeodomain Proteins/genetics , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , Kinetics , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Models, Biological , Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen/analysis , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Retinoblastoma-Like Protein p107/genetics , Transcription Factor HES-1 , Transcription, Genetic
12.
Nature ; 447(7142): 326-9, 2007 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17507983

ABSTRACT

All humans become infected with multiple herpesviruses during childhood. After clearance of acute infection, herpesviruses enter a dormant state known as latency. Latency persists for the life of the host and is presumed to be parasitic, as it leaves the individual at risk for subsequent viral reactivation and disease. Here we show that herpesvirus latency also confers a surprising benefit to the host. Mice latently infected with either murine gammaherpesvirus 68 or murine cytomegalovirus, which are genetically highly similar to the human pathogens Epstein-Barr virus and human cytomegalovirus, respectively, are resistant to infection with the bacterial pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Yersinia pestis. Latency-induced protection is not antigen specific but involves prolonged production of the antiviral cytokine interferon-gamma and systemic activation of macrophages. Latency thereby upregulates the basal activation state of innate immunity against subsequent infections. We speculate that herpesvirus latency may also sculpt the immune response to self and environmental antigens through establishment of a polarized cytokine environment. Thus, whereas the immune evasion capabilities and lifelong persistence of herpesviruses are commonly viewed as solely pathogenic, our data suggest that latency is a symbiotic relationship with immune benefits for the host.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Herpesviridae Infections/complications , Herpesviridae Infections/virology , Herpesviridae/physiology , Symbiosis , Virus Latency/physiology , Animals , Bacterial Infections/immunology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Herpesviridae Infections/immunology , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Listeria monocytogenes/immunology , Listeria monocytogenes/physiology , Listeriosis/complications , Listeriosis/immunology , Listeriosis/prevention & control , Macrophage Activation , Macrophages/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Muromegalovirus/immunology , Muromegalovirus/physiology , Plague/complications , Plague/immunology , Plague/prevention & control , West Nile Fever/complications , West Nile virus/physiology , Yersinia pestis/immunology , Yersinia pestis/physiology
13.
Mol Cell Biol ; 27(13): 4825-43, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17452454

ABSTRACT

The cell cycle regulatory retinoblastoma (Rb) protein is a key regulator of neural precursor proliferation; however, its role has been expanded to include a novel cell-autonomous role in mediating neuronal migration. We sought to determine the Rb-interacting factors that mediate both the cell cycle and migration defects. E2F1 and E2F3 are likely Rb-interacting candidates that we have shown to be deregulated in the absence of Rb. Using mice with compound null mutations of Rb and E2F1 or E2F3, we asked to what extent either E2F1 or E2F3 interacts with Rb in neurogenesis. Here, we report that E2F1 and E2F3 are both functionally relevant targets in neural precursor proliferation, cell cycle exit, and laminar patterning. Each also partially mediates the Rb requirement for neuronal survival. Neuronal migration, however, is specifically mediated through E2F3, beyond its role in cell cycle regulation. This study not only outlines overlapping and distinct functions for E2Fs in neurogenesis but also is the first to establish a physiologically relevant role for the Rb/E2F pathway beyond cell cycle regulation in vivo.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle , Cell Movement , E2F3 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Neurons/cytology , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Animals , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , E2F1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Interneurons/cytology , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Neurons/metabolism , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis , Protein Binding , Stem Cells/cytology , Stem Cells/metabolism , Telencephalon/embryology , Telencephalon/metabolism
14.
EMBO J ; 25(17): 4061-73, 2006 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16917506

ABSTRACT

The mitochondrial protein apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) translocates to the nucleus and induces apoptosis. Recent studies, however, have indicated the importance of AIF for survival in mitochondria. In the absence of a means to dissociate these two functions, the precise roles of AIF remain unclear. Here, we dissociate these dual roles using mitochondrially anchored AIF that cannot be released during apoptosis. Forebrain-specific AIF null (tel. AifDelta) mice have defective cortical development and reduced neuronal survival due to defects in mitochondrial respiration. Mitochondria in AIF deficient neurons are fragmented with aberrant cristae, indicating a novel role of AIF in controlling mitochondrial structure. While tel. AifDelta Apaf1(-/-) neurons remain sensitive to DNA damage, mitochondrially anchored AIF expression in these cells significantly enhanced survival. AIF mutants that cannot translocate into nucleus failed to induce cell death. These results indicate that the proapoptotic role of AIF can be uncoupled from its physiological function. Cell death induced by AIF is through its proapoptotic activity once it is translocated to the nucleus, not due to the loss of AIF from the mitochondria.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis Inducing Factor/physiology , Apoptosis , Mitochondria/physiology , Adenosine Triphosphate/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis Inducing Factor/genetics , Cell Survival , Cells, Cultured , DNA Damage , Membrane Potentials/physiology , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Mitochondria/ultrastructure , Mitochondrial Membranes/metabolism , Mitochondrial Membranes/ultrastructure , Neurons/physiology , Neurons/ultrastructure , Oxygen Consumption , Prosencephalon/embryology , Prosencephalon/metabolism , Protein Transport
15.
Cell Cycle ; 5(14): 1506-13, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16861920

ABSTRACT

Many cell cycle genes are known to play important roles in regulating proliferation in the nervous system, however, a growing body of research has proposed that these genes have diverse functions beyond cell cycle regulation. Through the study of new genetic models, cell cycle regulatory genes have been shown to impact on a number of processes during nervous system development including apoptosis, differentiation, and, most recently, neuronal migration. Here we emphasize that the proposed roles for cell cycle genes in neuronal differentiation and migration are not the consequence of deregulated cell cycle, but represent truly novel functions for cell cycle genes.


Subject(s)
Genes, cdc/physiology , Nervous System/growth & development , Animals , Cell Differentiation/genetics , Cell Movement/genetics , G1 Phase , Humans , Nervous System/cytology , S Phase
16.
EMBO J ; 24(24): 4381-91, 2005 Dec 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16308563

ABSTRACT

Precise cell cycle regulation is critical for nervous system development. To assess the role of the cell cycle regulator, retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, in forebrain development, we studied mice with telencephalon-specific Rb deletions. We examined the role of Rb in neuronal specification and migration of diverse neuronal populations. Although layer specification occurred at the appropriate time in Rb mutants, migration of early-born cortical neurons was perturbed. Consistent with defects in radial migration, neuronal cell death in Rb mutants specifically affected Cajal-Retzius neurons. In the ventral telencephalon, although calbindin- and Lhx6-expressing cortical neurons were generated at embryonic day 12.5, their tangential migration into the neocortex was dramatically and specifically reduced in the mutant marginal zone. Cell transplantation assays revealed that defects in tangential migration arose owing to a cell-autonomous loss of Rb in migrating interneurons and not because of a defective cortical environment. These results revealed a cell-autonomous role for Rb in regulating the tangential migration of cortical interneurons. Taken together, we reveal a novel requirement for the cell cycle protein, Rb, in the regulation of neuronal migration.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Neurons/metabolism , Retinoblastoma Protein/metabolism , Animals , Apoptosis , Body Patterning , Calbindins , Cell Cycle , Cell Differentiation , Cell Lineage , Cell Movement , Cell Survival , Coculture Techniques , Embryo, Mammalian/metabolism , Genotype , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization , LIM-Homeodomain Proteins , Mice , Models, Anatomic , Mutation , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Retinoblastoma/metabolism , S100 Calcium Binding Protein G/metabolism , Stem Cells/metabolism , Telencephalon/metabolism , Time Factors , Transcription Factors
17.
Dev Biol ; 258(2): 334-48, 2003 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12798292

ABSTRACT

The number of germ cells reaches the maximum just prior to entry into meiosis, yet decreases dramatically by a few days after birth in the female mouse, rat, and human. Previous studies have reported a major loss at the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase during fetal development, leading to the hypothesis that chromosomal pairing abnormalities may be a signal for oocyte death. However, the identification as well as the quantification of germ cells in these studies have been questioned. A recent study using Mouse Vasa Homologue (MVH) as a germ cell marker reached a contradictory conclusion claiming that oocyte loss occurs in the mouse only after birth. In the present study, we established a new method to quantify murine germ cells by using Germ Cell Nuclear Antigen-1 (GCNA-1) as a germ cell marker. Comparison of GCNA-1 and MVH immunolabeling revealed that the two markers identify the same population of germ cells. However, nuclear labeling of GCNA-1 was better suited for counting germ cells in histological sections as well as for double labeling with the antibody against synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins in chromosome spreading preparations. The latter experiment demonstrated that the majority of GCNA-1-labeled cells entered and progressed through meiotic prophase during fetal development. The number of GCNA-1-positive cells in the ovary was estimated by counting the labeled cells retained in chromosome spreading preparations and also in histological sections by using the ratio estimation method. Both methods demonstrated a continuous decline in the number of GCNA-1-labeled cells during fetal development when the oocytes progress through meiotic prophase. These observations suggest that multiple causes are responsible for oocyte elimination.


Subject(s)
Oocytes/cytology , Ovary/cytology , Ovary/embryology , Receptors, Retinoic Acid , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Antigens, Nuclear/metabolism , Biomarkers , Cell Count , Cell Death , Chromosome Pairing , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Female , Gestational Age , Immunohistochemistry , Meiosis , Mice , Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 6, Group A, Member 1 , Oocytes/metabolism , Ovary/growth & development , Ovary/metabolism , Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...