Racial and ethnic differences in pediatric access to preemptive kidney transplantation in the United States.

Preemptive kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for pediatric end stage renal disease patients to avoid increased morbidity and mortality associated with dialysis. It is unknown how race/ethnicity and poverty influence preemptive transplant access in pediatric. We examined the incidence of living donor or deceased donor preemptive transplantation among all black, white, and Hispanic children (<18 years) in the United States Renal Data System from 2000 to 2009. Adjusted risk ratios for preemptive transplant were calculated using multivariable-adjusted models and examined across health insurance and neighborhood poverty levels. Among 8,053 patients, 1117 (13.9%) received a preemptive transplant (66.9% from LD, 33.1% from DD). In multivariable analyses, there were significant racial/ethnic disparities in access to LD preemptive transplant where blacks were 66% (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.28-0.43) and Hispanics 52% (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35-0.67) less likely to receive a LD preemptive transplant versus whites. Blacks were 22% less likely to receive a DD preemptive transplant versus whites (RR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57-1.05), although results were not statistically significant. Future efforts to promote equity in preemptive transplant should address the critical issues of improving access to pre-ESRD nephrology care and overcoming barriers in living donation, including obstacles partially driven by poverty.

Racial disparities in pediatric access to kidney transplantation: does socioeconomic status play a role?

Racial disparities persist in access to renal transplantation in the United States, but the degree to which patient and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) impacts racial disparities in deceased donor renal transplantation access has not been examined in the pediatric and adolescent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. We examined the interplay of race and SES in a population-based cohort of all incident pediatric ESRD patients <21 years from the United States Renal Data System from 2000 to 2008, followed through September 2009. Of 8452 patients included, 30.8% were black, 27.6% white-Hispanic, 44.3% female and 28.0% lived in poor neighborhoods. A total of 63.4% of the study population was placed on the waiting list and 32.5% received a deceased donor transplant. Racial disparities persisted in transplant even after adjustment for SES, where minorities were less likely to receive a transplant compared to whites, and this disparity was more pronounced among patients 18-20 years. Disparities in access to the waiting list were mitigated in Hispanic patients with private health insurance. Our study suggests that racial disparities in transplant access worsen as pediatric patients transition into young adulthood, and that SES does not explain all of the racial differences in access to kidney transplantation.

The role of race and poverty on steps to kidney transplantation in the Southeastern United States.

Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation exist, but the effects of race and socioeconomic status (SES) on early steps of renal transplantation have not been well explored. Adult patients referred for renal transplant evaluation at a single transplant center in the Southeastern United States from 2005 to 2007, followed through May 2010, were examined. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from patient's medical records and then linked with United States Renal Data System and American Community Survey Census data. Cox models examined the effect of race on referral, evaluation, waitlisting and organ receipt. Of 2291 patients, 64.9% were black, the mean age was 49.4 years and 33.6% lived in poor neighborhoods. Racial disparities were observed in access to referral, transplant evaluation, waitlisting and organ receipt. SES explained almost one-third of the lower rate of transplant among black versus white patients, but even after adjustment for demographic, clinical and SES factors, blacks had a 59% lower rate of transplant than whites (hazard ratio = 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.58). Results suggest that improving access to healthcare may reduce some, but not all, of the racial disparities in access to kidney transplantation.

Associations between CMS's Clinical Performance Measures project benchmarks, profit structure, and mortality in dialysis units.

Prior studies observing greater mortality in for-profit dialysis units have not captured information about benchmarks of care. This study was undertaken to examine the association between profit status and mortality while achieving benchmarks. Utilizing data from the US Renal Data System and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Clinical Performance Measures project, hemodialysis units were categorized as for-profit or not-for-profit. Associations with mortality at 1 year were estimated using Cox regression. Two thousand six hundred and eighty-five dialysis units (31,515 patients) were designated as for-profit and 1018 (15,085 patients) as not-for-profit. Patients in for-profit facilities were more likely to be older, black, female, diabetic, and have higher urea reduction ratio (URR), hematocrit, serum albumin, and transferrin saturation. Patients (19.4 and 18.6%) in for-profit and not-for-profit units died, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, profit status was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=1.04, P=0.09). When added to models with profit status, the following resulted in a significant association between profit status (for-profit vs not-for-profit) and increasing mortality risk: URR, hematocrit, albumin, and ESRD Network. In adjusted models, patients in for-profit facilities had a greater death risk (HR 1.09, P=0.004). More patients in for-profit units met clinical benchmarks. Survival among patients in for-profit units was similar to not-for-profit units. This suggests that in the contemporary era, interventions in for-profit dialysis units have not impaired their ability to deliver performance benchmarks and do not affect survival.

The epidemiology and control of anaemia among pre-ESRD patients with chronic kidney disease.

Anaemia is a common condition among pre-end-stage renal disease (pre-ESRD) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Indeed, data from clinical studies indicate that anaemia may be present in as many as two-thirds of such patients. Use of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) provides an effective means of correcting anaemia in CKD patients and helps to reduce the risk of renal disease progression and related problems. Unfortunately, EPO therapy is underutilized in these persons. Consequently, anaemia remains a major problem in the pre-ESRD CKD population. Evidence suggests that anaemia in the presence of CKD can lead to an increased risk of a number of adverse outcomes, including mortality, progression of kidney disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, hospitalization, and decreases in quality of life. Anaemia's association with these adverse outcomes suggests that effective treatment of anaemia in pre-ESRD CKD patients is of great importance and that substantial efforts should be made to ensure that these patients receive appropriate therapy to correct anaemia.

Is readmission to hospital an indicator of poor process of care for patients with heart failure?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists about the appropriateness of using readmission as an indicator of the quality of care. A study was undertaken to measure the validity and predictive ability of readmission in this context. METHODS: An evaluation study was performed in patients discharged alive with heart failure from three Swiss academic medical centres. Process quality indicators were derived from evidence based guidelines for the management and treatment of heart failure. Readmissions were calculated from hospital administrative data. The predictive ability of readmissions was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate analyses, and validity by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, using process indicators as the "gold standard". RESULTS: Of 1055 eligible patients discharged alive, 139 (13.2%) were readmitted within 30 days. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for absence of measurement of left ventricular function was 0.70 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.08) for readmissions. In patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, three dose categories of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor were examined using ordinal logistic regression. The adjusted OR for these categories was 1.07 (95% CI 0.56 to 2.06) for readmissions. When using process indicators as the gold standard to assess the validity of readmissions, sensitivity ranged from 0.08 to 0.17 and specificity from 0.86 to 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission did not predict and was not a valid indicator of the quality of care for patients with heart failure admitted to three Swiss university hospitals.

Contribution of anaemia to progression of renal disease: a debate.

It is hypothesized that anaemia contributes to the progression of renal disease via hypoxia and oxidative stress. These effects may stimulate the production of extracellular matrix by fibroblasts, increasing interstitial fibrosis and leading to tubular destruction. Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO, epoetin) has antioxidative and anti-apoptotic properties, though these effects have yet to be demonstrated in renal cells. In theory, epoetin treatment might slow the progression of renal failure, not only by correcting anaemia but also via direct effects on tubular and vascular cell survival. Alternative hypotheses suggest, however, that epoetin could have negative effects on the kidney because of its vasoconstrictive action, which is independent of haemoglobin levels. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies clearly show that epoetin does not accelerate progression of renal disease, provided that blood pressure is well controlled. Some studies suggest that epoetin slows the progression of renal failure, although this remains a controversial issue, as all these studies have methodological limitations. Larger randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis of the existing trials are required to establish whether treatment of anaemia with epoetin can indeed slow the progression of renal disease.

Family history of end-stage renal disease does not predict dialytic survival.

Familial aggregation of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is frequently observed in the common causes of kidney failure. It is unknown whether the clinical course of nephropathy differs based on an individual's family history of ESRD. The ESRD Network 6 Family History of ESRD database was analyzed to compare dialytic survival among patients with first- or second-degree relatives on dialysis therapy (positive family history) with those lacking relatives with ESRD (negative family history). Study participants included 3,442 adult, black or white, incident patients with ESRD who initiated dialysis therapy in ESRD Network 6 facilities in 1995 and participated in the Network-sponsored Family History of ESRD study. All deaths were reported to the Network and used to calculate mortality rates. The relative risk for death was used to compare rates between levels of patient characteristics. Multivariate analyses used proportional hazards regression. Overall, 730 patients (21.2%) had a positive family history of ESRD. Black patients, those who were younger at the onset of ESRD, patients with greater degrees of functional status, and women were more likely to have a positive family history. During 9,000 patient-years of follow-up, 1,599 patients died (17.8 deaths/100 dialysis-years). Univariate analyses showed that patients with a positive family history of ESRD had 20% lower mortality than those with a negative family history of ESRD (relative risk, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 0.9; P = 0.001). Older age, white race, diabetic nephropathy, lower functional status, lower serum albumin level, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease also were associated with greater mortality rates. Multivariate analyses showed that only older age at onset of ESRD, white race, low functional status, ESRD caused by diabetes, and congestive heart failure were associated with increased mortality. A family history of ESRD in either first- or second-degree relatives was no longer a significant determinant of survival. We conclude that familial clustering of ESRD does not significantly impact on dialytic survival after controlling for the competing effects of patient race, age of ESRD onset, and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

Duration of dialysis and its relationship to dialysis adequacy, anemia management, and serum albumin level.

An analysis of the relationship between intermediate outcomes and duration of dialysis therapy in hemodialysis patients was performed by linking Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Core Indicators data with data obtained from HCFA form 2728 at the initiation of dialysis therapy. Patients who recently initiated hemodialysis therapy were less likely to meet Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines than patients with a longer duration of dialysis therapy. For both urea reduction ratio and Kt/V, odds ratios for adequate dialysis were approximately 0.20 for a duration of dialysis therapy less than 0.5 years and 0.42 to 0.63 for a duration of dialysis therapy of 0.5 to 1.0 years compared with a duration of dialysis therapy of 2.0 years or greater. For patients with a duration of dialysis therapy less than 0.5 years (compared with >/=2.0 years), the odds ratio for a hematocrit less than 28% was approximately 3.0, that for a hematocrit 33% or greater was approximately 0.6, and that for a serum albumin level of 3.5 g/dL or greater (bromcresol green method) or 3.2 g/dL or greater (bromcresol purple method) was approximately 0.4. There was a direct relationship between glomerular filtration rate at the initiation of dialysis therapy and both serum albumin and hematocrit values. Patients administered recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) predialysis were more likely to have greater hematocrits. There also was a direct relationship between hematocrit and serum albumin level. Therefore, several actionable items in regard to attentive overall medical care can result in an improvement in the percentage of patients newly started on hemodialysis therapy who meet intermediate outcomes, including the administration of rHuEPO predialysis, correction of iron deficiency, and timely placement of a permanent dialysis access.

Continuous quality improvement in dialysis units: basic tools.

Physicians and allied health professionals are expected to understand and participate in the assessment and improvement of the quality of care delivered to patients in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treatment centers. Participating in the quality improvement process will bring clinicians into contact with special knowledge and skills drawn from the areas of statistical process control and industrial engineering. Some of the more frequently encountered of these concepts and tools are described.

Subcutaneous erythropoietin results in lower dose and equivalent hematocrit levels among adult hemodialysis patients: Results from the 1998 End-Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project.

The National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) guidelines recommend that epoetin alfa should be administered by the subcutaneous route in hemodialysis patients. We determined whether hematocrit levels in hemodialysis patients differed by route of epoetin alfa administration after controlling for demographic factors and iron status. Data were available for 7,092 of the 7,658 patients randomly chosen for inclusion in the 1997 Health Care Financing Administration Core Indicators sample. Epoetin alfa was administered to 96% of the study cohort and was administered subcutaneously in 10% of patients. After controlling for hematocrit, patient characteristics, adequacy of dialysis, iron status, serum albumin, postdialysis weight, and duration of dialysis, the epoetin alfa dose by the intravenous route was 193.6 units/kg/wk (95% confidence interval, 189.5 to 197.8 units/kg/wk) compared with 167.4 units/kg/wk (95% confidence interval, 153.9 to 180.8 units/kg/wk) for the subcutaneous route (P < 0.001). The mean hematocrit for the subcutaneous route was 32.7% +/- 3.4% and for the intravenous route was 33.0% +/- 3.2% (P < 0.05). Factors independently associated with increased hematocrit included male gender, white race, older patient age, greater number of years on dialysis, higher serum albumin concentration, higher urea reduction ratio, and percent transferrin saturation (all P < 0.001). After controlling for patient factors and weekly epoetin alfa dose, there was no association between route of epoetin alfa administration and hematocrit level (P = 0.144). Patients receiving epoetin alfa by the subcutaneous route had comparable hematocrit values using a lower epoetin alfa dose than patients receiving epoetin alfa intravenously. These data support the NKF-DOQI recommendation that epoetin alfa be administered subcutaneously in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Risk factors for microalbuminuria in black americans with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to describe the prevalence of and risk factors for microalbuminuria among blacks with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Black adults with diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus of 2 years' duration or less who presented for care to the Grady Diabetes Clinic (Atlanta, GA) between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 1996, were eligible (n = 1,167). Information obtained at the initial visit included age; sex; body mass index (BMI); serum total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, C-peptide, serum creatinine, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA(1c)) levels; and seated systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Outcome was urine albumin-creatinine (Alb/Cr) ratio at the initial visit. Alb/Cr ratios were categorized as normal (Alb/Cr <25 microgram/mg), microalbuminuric (Alb/Cr, 25 to 250 microgram/mg), and macroalbuminuric (Alb/Cr >250 microgram/mg). Patients with macroalbuminuria or creatinine levels of 2 mg/dL or greater were excluded. We used multiple linear regression to assess the joint association between HbA(1c) level, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and log-transformed Alb/Cr, controlling for other covariates. Of 1,044 patients studied, macroalbuminuria was present in 3.8%, and microalbuminuria, in 23.4%. Alb/Cr was independently associated with increased HbA(1c) level (P = 0.0070), MAP (P = 0.0001), BMI (P = 0.0156), log-transformed triglyceride levels (P = 0.0031), C-peptide level of 6.5 ng/mL or greater (P = 0.0007), serum creatinine level (P: = 0.0068), and male sex (P = 0.0220). The relationship between HbA(1c) level and microalbuminuria was stronger in patients with lower BMIs. Microalbuminuria prevalence was high in this population of urban blacks with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Risk factors associated with increased Alb/Cr included male sex, poor glycemic control, endogenous hyperinsulinemia, high blood pressure, elevated triglyceride levels, and obesity.

Variations among hospitals in the quality of care for heart failure.

CONTEXT: Determining variations in quality of care among hospitals can help direct attention to poorly performing institutions. PRACTICE PATTERN EXAMINED: The proportion of patients with congestive heart failure meeting various quality criteria in 69 hospitals. HOSPITAL SELECTION: The hospitals were voluntary participants in a quality improvement program in five states (Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Oklahoma, and Virginia). PATIENT SELECTION: All patients with congestive heart failure discharged from the participating hospitals during a 15-month period in 1995 to 1996 (or, for hospitals with more than 50 eligible patients, a random sample of 50 patients). The total sample consisted of 2077 patients. DATA SOURCE: Documentation in the hospital medical record of left ventricular function, discharge medications, and discharge instructions. RESULTS: Left ventricular function was determined in 72% of patients (range across hospitals, 18% to 97%). Among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, 79% were prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (range, 54% to 94%). Only 23% of the patients prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors received the target dose (range, 0% to 60%). Sixty-four percent of patients were counseled about the importance of a low-sodium diet at discharge (range, 25% to 97%), but only 8% were counseled about daily weight monitoring (range, 0% to 30%). CONCLUSION: Our results show substantial hospital-to-hospital variation in the quality of care for patients with heart failure.

Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between dialysis dose, patient characteristics, and medical comorbidities on mortality in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. METHODS: This work comprised a study cohort of 1446 patients obtained from a random sample of chronic peritoneal dialysis patients from each dialysis center in three southeastern states. Data collected on a standardized form were used to calculate weekly Kt/V urea and creatinine clearance. Data were linked to Network files containing data on patient demographic and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Both weekly Kt/V urea and creatinine clearance were measured at least once in only 60.5% of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and 63.7% of cycler patients. Among the 873 patients who had at least one calculable adequacy measure, the mean (+/-SD) weekly Kt/V urea was 2.13 +/- 0.55, and the normalized mean weekly creatinine clearance was 62.9 +/- 20.4 L/week/m2. During the seven month period of follow-up, there were 140 deaths. In separate logistic regression models that included all of the studied risk factors, using separate variables for the urinary and peritoneal components of dialysis adequacy, each 10 L/week/1.73 m2 increase in the urinary component of weekly creatinine clearance was associated with a 40% decreased risk of death, and each 0.1 unit increase in the urinary component of weekly Kt/V urea was associated with a 12% decreased risk of death. In contrast, the dialysate components of neither weekly creatinine clearance nor weekly Kt/V urea were predictive of death. Other factors that were associated with an increased risk of death included increasing age, diabetes mellitus as the cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and a history of myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Residual renal function, as expressed by weekly creatinine clearance or Kt/V urea, is an important predictor of death in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. The nonsignificant findings regarding peritoneal clearances and mortality may possibly be secondary to the narrow range of peritoneal clearances in this study cohort.

Intermediate outcomes by race and ethnicity in peritoneal dialysis patients: results from the 1997 ESRD Core Indicators Project. National ESRD Core Indicators Workgroup.

BACKGROUND: Hispanics are the fastest growing minority group in the United States, and approximately 10% of all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are Hispanic. Few data are available, however, regarding dialysis adequacy and anemia management in Hispanic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) ESRD Core Indicators Project were used to assess racial and ethnic differences in selected intermediate outcomes for peritoneal dialysis patients. RESULTS: Of the 1219 patients for whom data were available from the 1997 sample, 9% were Hispanic, 24% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 59% were non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as a cause of ESRD compared to blacks or whites, and both Hispanics and blacks were younger than white patients (both p < 0.001). Although whites had higher weekly Kt/V and creatinine clearance values compared to blacks or Hispanics (p < 0.05), blacks had been dialyzing longer (p < 0.01) and were more likely to be anuric compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). Blacks had significantly lower mean hematocrit values (p < 0.001) and a greater proportion of patients who had a hematocrit level less than 28% (p < 0.05) compared to Hispanics or whites, despite receiving significantly larger weekly mean epoetin alfa doses (p < 0.05) and having significantly higher mean serum ferritin concentrations (p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences by race/ethnicity for experiencing a weekly Kt/V urea < 2.0 and hypertension, but not for other intermediate outcomes examined (weekly creatinine clearance < 60 L/week/1.73 m2, Hct < 30%, and serum albumin < 3.5/3.2 g/dL). CONCLUSION: Hispanics had adequacy values similar to blacks and anemia parameters similar to whites. Additional studies are needed to determine the etiologies of the differences in intermediate outcomes by racial and ethnic groupings in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Racial variation in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

These analyses were undertaken to determine whether racial variation contributes to the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in close relatives of incident dialysis patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD)-associated ESRD. A family history of ESRD was recorded in 14,769 incident ESRD patients in Network 6 (Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina) between September 1993 and November 1997. Two hundred thirty-seven patients with ADPKD-ESRD comprised the study population (180 white and 57 black). Differences in patient populations were analyzed using the chi-squared and Student's t-tests, and multiple regression analysis was performed. Correlation in age at ESRD onset in families was performed by linear regression analysis. A positive family history (FH) of ESRD in first- or second-degree relatives was reported by 38.6% (22 of 57) of blacks and 55% (99 of 180) of whites (P = 0.03). The 22 blacks with a positive FH had a mean of 2.0 additional ESRD relatives and 10.4 total first-degree relatives, whereas the 99 whites with a positive FH had a mean of 2.6 additional ESRD relatives and 7.0 total first-degree relatives (P = 0.14 and P < 0.001, respectively). Mean age in years at first dialysis was similar in blacks and whites, regardless of FH (black FH positive, 63.8; black FH negative, 66.3; P = 0.66; white FH positive, 60.8; white FH negative, 62.8; P = 0. 48). On average, 57.9% of the first- and second-degree relatives of white cases had ADPKD-associated ESRD, compared with 28.6% of the relatives of black cases (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, white race (P = 0.004) and increasing family size (P = 0.002) were positively correlated with the number of relatives having ADPKD-associated ESRD, whereas age at ESRD onset (P = 0.50) and gender (P = 0.94) were not. Age at onset of ESRD was correlated within members of multiply affected white (P < 0.001) but not black families (P = 0.80). We conclude that blacks with ADPKD-associated ESRD are less likely than whites to have relatives with ESRD, and there is no correlation in age at onset of ADPKD-ESRD in black families.

Patient-reported quality of life early in dialysis treatment: effects associated with usual exercise activity.

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with quality of life (QoL) early in treatment in a cohort of incident (i.e. newly diagnosed) dialysis patients. This multicenter study investigated QoL reported by patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) at approximately 60 days following the start of treatment. QoL was assessed by the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (MOS-SF 36) and by disease-targeted scales from the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL). Patient's QoL as measured by the SF-36 was substantially impaired compared to norms for the general population. In univariate analyses, patients' QoL scores were related to demographic variables (age, race, sex, educational level), clinical variables (predialysis BUN and serum creatinine, primary diagnosis of diabetes, cardiovascular comorbidity, average hematocrit and serum albumin in first months of treatment), dialysis variables (HD/PD modality, PD dialysis adequacy, facility patient-staff ratio) and patient's level of usual exercise activity. In multivariate analyses, the most important independent QoL predictor was patient's usual level of exercise activity. Exercise activity independently predicted two performance measures of physical functioning, maximal gait speed and repeated chair rises, as well as patient-perceived physical functioning. Continued study of patient outcomes in relation to adequacy of delivered dialysis, early versus late diagnosis of chronic renal failure (CRF), and patient's usual exercise activity is important because these variables can be the focus for intervention strategies to prevent early deterioration in dialysis patients' functional health status.

Can dialysis therapy be improved? A report from the ESRD Core Indicators Project.

We assessed the association between quality improvement interventions conducted during the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Core Indicators Project and changes in the adequacy of hemodialysis between 1993 and 1996. Improvement of hemodialysis adequacy was measured by baseline and annual urea reduction ratios (URRs) in representative samples of ESRD Network patients. Random samples of in-center hemodialysis patients aged 18 years and older who had received hemodialysis during the fourth quarters of 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996 were used to calculate Network-specific outcomes. A mean URR was calculated for each patient using the first pretreatment and posttreatment blood urea nitrogen for October, November, and December of each study year. Both national and Network-specific interventions were used to provide feedback reports and technical assistance to treatment centers to foster improvement in hemodialysis adequacy. All Networks distributed reports on the patterns of treatment center URR levels and physician and patient educational materials to each center in the Network. Each Network selected an annual 10% sample of treatment centers in 1994 and 1995 and conducted quality improvement activities to assist the selected centers to improve dialysis adequacy. We defined Network-specific interventions by a survey of the 18 Networks conducted during 1995 to determine the characteristics of Network-specific activities used to improve adequacy of hemodialysis. The outcome of interest was the change over time in Network-specific URR value. Sustained improvement in the URR occurred within all 18 Networks between 1993 and 1996. The mean national URR increased from 62.7% in 1993 to 66. 8% in 1996. The proportion of patients with URR >/= 65% increased from 43% in 1993 to 68% in 1996. Networks reported implementing a variety of intervention strategies that included educational activities, continuous quality improvement workshops, on-site assistance, and supervision of selected treatment facilities until care improved. Network-specific interventions independently associated with an increased rate of improvement in URR included prolonged supervision of the selected facilities. We concluded that the sustained improvement in hemodialysis care that occurred after the inception of the ESRD Core Indicators Project was associated with specific ESRD Network interventions.

Racial/ethnic analysis of selected intermediate outcomes for hemodialysis patients: results from the 1997 ESRD Core Indicators Project.

Principal goals of the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Core Indicators Project are to improve the care provided to ESRD patients and to identify categorical variability in intermediate outcomes of dialysis care. The purpose of the current analysis is to extend our observations about the variability of intermediate outcomes of ESRD care among different racial and gender groups to a previously unreported group, Hispanic Americans. This group is a significant and growing minority segment of the ESRD population. A random sample of Medicare-eligible adult, in-center, hemodialysis patients was selected and stratified from an end-of-year ESRD patient census for 1996. Of the 6,858 patients in the final sample, 45% were non-Hispanic whites, 36% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 11% were Hispanic. Whites were older than blacks or Hispanics (P < 0.001). Hispanics were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as a primary diagnosis than either blacks or whites (P < 0.001). Even though they received longer hemodialysis times and were treated with high-flux hemodialyzers, blacks had significantly lower hemodialysis doses than white or Hispanic patients (P < 0.001). The intradialytic weight losses were greater for blacks (P < 0.05). The delivered hemodialysis dose was lower for blacks than for whites or Hispanics whether measured as a urea reduction ratio (URR) or as the Kt/V calculated by the second generation formula of Daugirdas (median 1. 32, 1.36, and 1.37, respectively, P < 0.001). Hispanics and whites had modestly higher hematocrits than blacks (33.2, 33.2, and 33.0%, respectively, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference among groups in the weekly prescribed epoetin alfa dose ( approximately 172 units/kg/week). A significantly greater proportion of Hispanic patients had transferrin saturations >/=20% compared with the other two groups (P < 0.001). Logistic regression modeling revealed that whites were significantly more likely to have serum albumin <3. 5(BCG)/3.2(BCP) gm/dL (OR 1.4, p < 0.01); blacks were significantly more likely to have a delivered Kt/V < 1.2 (OR 1.4, P < 0.001) and hematocrit <30%, (OR 1.2; P < 0.05) and both blacks and Hispanics were significantly more likely to have a delivered URR < 65% (OR 1.5, P < 0.001 and 1.2, P < 0.05, respectively).

Validation of the pneumonia severity index. Importance of study-specific recalibration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive validity and calibration of the pneumonia severity-of-illness index (PSI) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). PATIENTS: Randomly selected patients (n = 1,024) admitted with CAP to 22 community hospitals. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Medical records were abstracted to obtain prognostic information used in the PSI. The discriminatory ability of the PSI to identify patients who died and the calibration of the PSI across deciles of risk were determined. The PSI discriminates well between patients with high risk of death and those with a lower risk. In contrast, calibration of the PSI was poor, and the PSI predicted about 2.4 times more deaths than actually occurred in our population of patients with CAP. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the PSI had good discriminatory ability. The original PSI overestimated absolute risk of death in our population. We describe a simple approach to recalibration, which corrected the overestimation in our population. Recalibration may be needed when transporting this prediction rule across populations.