An incidental finding of a right atrial myxoma with undiagnosed Ebstein anomaly: a case report.

Background: Ebstein anomaly (EA) is a rare congenital abnormality of the tricuspid valve which can lead to progressive right heart dilatation and arrhythmias. While often seen in conjunction with other congenital cardiac lesions, such as atrial septal defects, it is not normally associated with atrial myxomas. Case summary: We present a case report of an incidental finding of a right atrial myxoma in the context of undiagnosed EA, in a 16-year-old male who presented with appendicitis. Subtle cardiomegaly on routine chest X-ray prompted further investigation, which demonstrated characteristic findings of both conditions and culminated in surgical repair using the Cone procedure. At 4-month follow-up, the patient was asymptomatic, and transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated a mean gradient of 4.5 mmHg across the tricuspid valve with mild regurgitation. Discussion: The combination of EA with right-sided myxoma is exceedingly rare, and, in this case, it may be that the apical displacement of the tricuspid valve was protective against right atrioventricular obstruction. We are reminded that although subtle abnormalities on routine investigations can be of limited significance, they can also indicate more serious underlying pathology and so consideration should be given to an appropriate cascade of further investigations to yield a timely diagnosis and enable prompt treatment.

Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Renal Function on the Spectrum of Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the differential effect of renal impairment across the spectrum of patients with ischaemic heart disease and to study if any established risk factors may modify this risk. METHODS: A total of 2013 patients who underwent revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or invasive physiology assessment were included. Renal impairment was defined as glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min/1.73m2. Clinical endpoints were prospectively collected, and the primary endpoint was defined as the composite endpoints of death, myocardial infarction, and unplanned revascularization. RESULTS: 593 (30%) presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 1362 (70%) stable patients had invasive ischaemia assessment which resulted in 37% receiving revascularization and 63% being deferred. Renal impairment was associated with increased adverse events in myocardial infarction [HR 1.77 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.74)], but not in the revascularized stable group [(HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.62 to 2.08)] or the deferred group [HR 1.31 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.03)]. There was an exponential increase in the future risk in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with severe renal dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate < 30) compared to a linear relationship in stable patients. Age and hypertension were the only two factors that had a differential impact across three groups (P<0.05 for interactions), with inconsistent directional effect of hypertension between medically managed and revascularized groups. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of risk of renal impairment varies according to the clinical presentation of coronary artery disease with more weighted risk in myocardial infarction compared to stable patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Revascularisation Using Fractional Flow Reserve in Diabetic Patients.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is used to assess the functional significance of coronary artery lesions. Diabetic patients are associated with high burden of atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction. We studied the clinical outcomes of diabetic patients who underwent FFR-guided deferred revascularisation. METHODS: Consecutive patients from a single large volume centre who underwent FFR assessment were included. Clinical endpoints were prospectively collected using the national electronic care records system. The primary endpoint was defined as the four-year risk of the vessel-oriented composite outcome of cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (VMI), and vessel-related urgent revascularisation (VUR). Absolute FFR values groups (0.81 to 0.85; 0.86 to 0.90; and >0.90) were used to further stratify patient outcomes. RESULTS: FFR-guided deferred revascularisation occurred in 860 patients (63%), of whom 159 were diabetic. The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the diabetic compared to the non-diabetic group [HR 1.76 (95%CI 1.08 to 2.88), P = 0.024]. The difference was driven from cardiac death (6.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.044) and VMI (5.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.012) but not VUR (8.8% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.07). There was a significant decrease in the incidence of the primary endpoint in the diabetic group according to FFR groups (23.6%, 12.3%, 2.4%, P = 0.001) with comparable clinical outcomes in the non-diabetic group (11.8%, 6.4%, 7.4%, P = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated an increased risk of death and target vessel MI in diabetic patients undergoing FFR-guided deferred revascularisation compared to non-diabetic group. Nonetheless, FFR remained a useful tool to identify those at future risk, mainly in diabetic patients.