A Single-Institution Analysis of Targeted Colorectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway Strategies That Decrease Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Decreasing readmissions is an important quality improvement strategy. Targeted interventions that effectively decrease readmissions have not been fully investigated and standardized. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to decrease readmissions after colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparison of patients before and after the implementation of interventions. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single institution dedicated enhanced recovery pathway colorectal surgery service. PATIENTS: The study group received quality review interventions that were designed to decrease readmissions: preadmission class upgrades, a mobile phone app, a pharmacist-led pain management strategy, and an early postdischarge clinic. The control group was composed of enhanced recovery patients before the interventions. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust patient characteristics and predictors for imbalances. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome was 30-day readmissions. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits. RESULTS: There were 1052 patients in the preintervention group and 668 patients in the postintervention group. After propensity score weighting, the postintervention cohort had a significantly lower readmission rate (9.98% vs 17.82%, p < 0.001) and emergency department visit rate (14.58% vs 23.15%, p < 0.001) than the preintervention group, and surgical site infection type I/II was significantly decreased as a readmission diagnosis (9.46% vs 2.43%, p = 0.043). Median time to readmission was 6 (interquartile 3-11) days in the preintervention group and 8 (3-17) days in the postintervention group (p = 0.21). Ileus, acute kidney injury, and surgical site infection type III were common reasons for readmissions and emergency department visits. LIMITATIONS: A single-institution study may not be generalizable. CONCLUSION: Readmission bundles composed of targeted interventions are associated with a decrease in readmissions and emergency department visits after enhanced recovery colorectal surgery. Bundle composition may be institution dependent. Further study and refinement of bundle components are required as next-step quality metric improvements. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B849. ANLISIS EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIN DE LAS CIRUGAS COLORECTALES CON VAS DE RECUPERACIN DIRIGIDA AUMENTADA QUE REDUCEN LOS REINGRESOS: ANTECEDENTES:La reducción de los reingresos es una importante estrategia de mejora de la calidad. Las intervenciones dirigidas que reducen eficazmente los reingresos no se han investigado ni estandarizado por completo.OBJETIVO:El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar la efectividad de las intervenciones diseñadas para disminuir los reingresos después de la cirugía colorrectal.DISEÑO:Comparación retrospectiva de pacientes antes y después de la implementación de las intervenciones.ESCENARIO:Una sola institución dedicada al Servicio de cirugía colorrectal con vías de recuperación dirigida aumentadaPACIENTES:El grupo de estudio recibió intervenciones de revisión de calidad que fueron diseñadas para disminuir los reingresos: actualizaciones de clases previas a la admisión, una aplicación para teléfono móvil, una estrategia de manejo del dolor dirigida por farmacéuticos y alta temprana de la clínica. El grupo de control estaba compuesto por pacientes con recuperación mejorada antes de las intervenciones. Se utilizó la ponderación del puntaje de propensión para ajustar las características del paciente y los predictores de los desequilibrios.PARÁMETRO DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:El resultado primario fueron los reingresos a los 30 días. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron visitas al servicio de urgencias.RESULTADOS:Hubo 1052 pacientes en el grupo de preintervención y 668 pacientes en el grupo de posintervención. Después de la ponderación del puntaje de propensión, la cohorte posterior a la intervención tuvo una tasa de reingreso significativamente menor (9,98% frente a 17,82%, p <0,001) y una tasa de visitas al servicio de urgencias (14,58% frente a 23,15%, p <0,001) que el grupo de preintervención y la infección del sitio quirúrgico tipo I / II se redujo significativamente como diagnóstico de reingreso (9,46% frente a 2,43%, p = 0,043). La mediana de tiempo hasta la readmisión fue de 6 [IQR 3, 11] días en el grupo de preintervención y de 8 [3, 17] días en el grupo de posintervención (p = 0,21). El íleo, la lesión renal aguda y la infección del sitio quirúrgico tipo III fueron motivos frecuentes de reingresos y visitas al servicio de urgencias.LIMITACIONES:El estudio de una sola institución puede no ser generalizable.CONCLUSIÓNES:Los paquetes de readmisión compuestos por intervenciones dirigidas se asocian con una disminución en las readmisiones y las visitas al departamento de emergencias después de una cirugía colorrectal con vías de recuperación dirigida aumentada. La composición del paquete puede depender de la institución. Se requieren más estudios y refinamientos de los componentes del paquete como siguiente paso de mejora de la métrica de calidad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B849. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado).

A propensity score matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway.

Intracorporeal options for sigmoid resection have been recently developed but not extensively evaluated. This study was designed to assess outcomes comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted sigmoid resection in an established enhanced recovery pathway. This is a retrospective comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted sigmoid resection for benign and malignant disease. Operative technique for the newer intracorporeal innovation is described in detail. Propensity score matching was performed using patient characteristics as predictors in the propensity score model. 169 cases met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 114 cases were available for analysis (intracorporeal 57, extracorporeal 57). Almost 90% were for diverticulitis in each group. There were significantly fewer conversions in the intracorporeal group when compared to the extracorporeal group (5.26% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.029). Operative time was significantly longer in the intracorporeal group (193.33 vs. 159.89 min, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups for time to flatus and bowel movements, hospital length of stay, postoperative 30-day complications, and readmission rates. There were significantly fewer extraction site hernias in the intracorporeal group (0 vs. 6 (10.53%), P = 0.027) likely because there were fewer midline extraction sites (8.77% vs. 38.6%, P < 0.001). When compared to extracorporeal techniques for robotic sigmoid resection in an enhanced recovery pathway, the intracorporeal approach is safe and associated with fewer conversions, fewer extraction site hernias, and longer operating times. As adoption of the intracorporeal approach continues to increase, further analysis of this technique in larger studies may be warranted.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Epidural Analgesia in a Colon and Rectal Surgery Enhanced Recovery Pathway: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal pain management is an integral part of enhanced recovery pathways. The most effective pain management strategies have not been determined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This is a single-institution, open-label randomized (1:1) trial. SETTING: This study compared liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing elective open and minimally invasive colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery pathway. PATIENTS: Two hundred were enrolled. Following randomization, allocation, and follow-up, there were 92 patients with transversus abdominis plane block and 87 patients with epidural analgesia available for analysis. INTERVENTIONS: The interventions comprised liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were numeric pain scores and the overall benefit of analgesia scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Numeric Pain Scale and Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score between groups. Time trend analysis revealed that patients with transversus abdominis plane block had higher numeric pain scores on the day of surgery, but that the relationship was reversed later in the postoperative period. Opioid use was significantly less in the transversus abdominis plane block group (206.84 mg vs 98.29 mg, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in time to GI recovery, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Cost was considerably more for the epidural analgesia group. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted at a single institution. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial shows that perioperative pain management with liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block is as effective as epidural analgesia and is associated with less opioid use and less cost. These data and the more favorable risk profile suggest that liposomal bupivacaine transversus abdominis plane block is a viable multimodal perioperative pain management option for this patient population in an established enhanced recovery pathway. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02591407). See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A737.

A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway.

INTRODUCTION: There may be short-term outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal approach to minimally invasive right colectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery colorectal surgery service. RESULTS: 55 intracorporeal and 55 extracorporeal cases were compared. Operative time was significantly longer (p < 0.001) and incision length shorter in the intracorporeal group (p = 0.007). Outcomes significantly favorable for the intracorporeal group included conversion-to-open (p = 0.013), time to first flatus (p < 0.001), time to first bowel movement (p = 0.006), and dehydration (p = 0.03). There were more extraction site hernias in the midline compared to off-midline locations, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: There are outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal technique for robotic-assisted right colectomy when compared to the extracorporeal approach for patients in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway. Training efforts should continue to advocate the intracorporeal option.

Comparison of stapling techniques and management of the mesoappendix in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Many techniques for laparoscopic appendectomy have been proposed with few comparative studies. We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis from 2006 to 2011. Techniques were: (1) transection of the mesoappendix and appendix with a single staple line (SSL); (2) transection of the mesoappendix and appendix with multiple staple lines (MSL); and (3) transection of the mesoappendix with ultrasonic shears and the appendix with a single staple line (USSL). A total of 565 cases were reviewed (149 SSL, 259 MSL, and 157 USSL). Patients treated with the SSL technique had decreased operative duration (P<0.001) and length of stay (P=0.003) despite equivalent disease presentations. Multivariate analysis demonstrated decreased operative duration with the SSL technique (P=0.001). Use of a SSL for transection of the mesoappendix and appendix is both a safe and efficient technique that results in reduced operative duration with excellent surgical outcomes.

A new method for estimation of involved BSAs for obese and normal-weight patients with burn injury.

An accurate measurement of BSA involved in patients injured by burns is critical in determining initial fluid requirements, nutritional needs, and criteria for tertiary center admissions. The rule of nines and the Lund-Browder chart are commonly used to calculate the BSA involved. However, their accuracy in all patient populations, namely obese patients, remains to be proven. Detailed BSA measurements were obtained from 163 adult patients according to linear formulas defined previously for individual body segments. Patients were then grouped based on body mass index (BMI). The contribution of individual body segments to the TBSA was determined based on BMI, and the validity of existing measurement tools was examined. Significant errors were found when comparing all groups with the rule of nines, which overestimated the contribution of the head and arms to the TBSA while underestimating the trunk and legs for all BMI groups. A new rule is proposed to minimize error, assigning 5% of the TBSA to the head and 15% of the TBSA to the arms across all BMI groups, while alternating the contribution of the trunk/legs as follows: normal-weight 35/45%, obese 40/40%, and morbidly obese 45/35%. Current modalities used to determine BSA burned are subject to significant errors, which are magnified as BMI increases. This new method provides increased accuracy in estimating the BSA involved in patients with burn injury regardless of BMI.