Human factors in pelvic exenteration: themes in high-performing teams.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of human factors in pelvic exenteration and how team performance is optimized in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative phases. METHOD: Qualitative analysis of focus groups was used to capture authentic human interactions that reflect real-world multiprofessional performance. Theatre teams were treated as clusters, with a particular focus group containing participants who worked together regularly. RESULTS: Three focus groups were conducted. Four themes emerged - driving force, technical skills, nontechnical skills and operational aspects - with a total of 16 subthemes. Saturation was reached by group 2, with no new subthemes emerging after this. There was some interaction between the themes and the subthemes. Broadly speaking, driving force led to the development of specialised technical skills and nontechnical skills, which were operationalized into successful service through operational aspects. CONCLUSION: This study of teams performing pelvic exenteration is the first in the field using this methodology. It has generated rich qualitative data with authentic insights into the pragmatic aspects of developing and delivering a service. In addition, it shows how the themes are connected or 'coupled' in a network, for example technical and non-technical skills. In a complex system, 'tight coupling' leads to both high performance and adverse events. In this paper, we report the qualitative aspects of high performance by pelvic exenteration teams in a complex sociotechnical system, which depends on tight coupling of several themes.

Colostomy and quality of life after spinal cord injury: systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a significant impact on the quality of life (QoL) of affected patients. The aim of this review was to determine whether colostomy formation improves QoL in patients with SCI. METHODS: The Cochrane Register, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL were searched using medical subject headings. The search was extended to the reference lists of identified studies, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. All clinical trials that included spinal injury and QoL, time spent on bowel care, and patient satisfaction with stoma were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were found (including 488 patients with a stoma), of which 13 were retrospective cross-sectional studies and two were case-control studies, one of which was prospective research. Nine of 11 studies focusing on QoL reported that patients' QoL was improved by the stoma, whereas the remaining two studies found no difference. Time spent on bowel care was significantly reduced in all 13 studies that considered this outcome, with patients reducing the average time spent on bowel care from more than 1 h to less than 15 min per day. All 12 studies assessing patient satisfaction with their stoma reported high patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Stoma formation improves QoL, reduces time spent on bowel care, and increases independence. Stoma is an option that could be discussed and offered to patients with spinal cord injury.

ANTECEDENTES: La lesión de la médula espinal (Spinal Cord Injury, SCI) tiene una clara repercusión en la calidad de vida (Quality of Life, QoL) de los pacientes que la sufren. El objetivo de este manuscrito fue determinar si la realización de una colostomía mejora la calidad de vida en pacientes con SCI. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en los registros Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase y CINAHL utilizando palabras clave. La búsqueda se extendió a la bibliografía de los estudios identificados, al clinictrials.gov y al Registro Internacional de Ensayos Clínicos de la OMS. Se evaluaron todos los ensayos clínicos que analizaron la lesión espinal y la calidad de vida, el tiempo dedicado al cuidado intestinal y la satisfacción del paciente con el estoma. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 15 estudios (con 488 pacientes) de los que 13 fueron estudios transversales retrospectivos, 2 eran estudios caso-control y uno era un estudio prospectivo. Nueve de los 11 estudios que analizaron la calidad de vida revelaron que la colostomía mejoraba la calidad de vida de los pacientes, mientras que en los 2 restantes no se encontraron diferencias. El tiempo dedicado al cuidado intestinal se redujo significativamente en los 13 estudios. De promedio, los pacientes redujeron el tiempo dedicado al cuidado intestinal de más de una hora por día a menos de 15 minutos. Los 12 estudios que evaluaron la satisfacción del paciente con la colostomía constataron una alta satisfacción de los pacientes con sus estomas. CONCLUSIÓN: La construcción de un estoma mejora la calidad de vida, reduce el tiempo dedicado al cuidado intestinal y aumenta la independencia. El estoma es una opción que podría discutirse y ser ofrecida a pacientes con lesión de la médula espinal.

Adherence to exclusive enteral nutrition by adults with active Crohn's disease is associated with conscientiousness personality trait: a sub-study.

BACKGROUND: It is probable that psychosocial factors predict adherence to exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN). Conscientiousness is an intrapersonal factor associated with greater medication adherence and healthy eating behaviours. This sub-study aimed to determine whether adherence to EEN was associated with conscientiousness. METHODS: Two groups of adults aged 16-40 years, were recruited to use EEN. Adults with active Crohn's disease used either EEN for 8 weeks or 2 weeks of EEN followed by 6 weeks of partial enteral nutrition (PEN). A control group of healthy adults used EEN for 2 weeks. Participants who reported eating food during EEN, ate more than one meal per day during PEN, or could not initiate or tolerate the oral nutritional supplements were defined as non-adherent. Conscientiousness was measured using the conscientiousness subset of the Big Five Inventory. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with active Crohn's disease (mean age 24.8 years) and 21 healthy adults (mean age 27.3 years) completed the conscientiousness questionnaire. In the Crohn's disease group, 23 (59%) completed and adhered to the treatments compared to 17 (81%) healthy adults; their conscientiousness scores were similar. Adherence and completion by the Crohn's disease group were associated with a greater mean conscientiousness score 35.57 (95% confidence interval = 32.88-38.25) compared to 30.13 (95% confidence interval = 26.53-33.73) in the non-adherent Crohn's disease group (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Conscientiousness was associated with treatment adherence. EEN can be a cognitively and emotionally demanding treatment for active adults with Crohn's disease; thus, considering personality traits may help determine suitable candidates.

Disability in Restorative Proctocolectomy Recipients Measured using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Disability Index.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] disability index [IBD-DI], which measures IBD-associated disability, has been validated on IBD patients but not those who have had restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [RP with IPAA]. This study aimed to utilize the IBD-DI in RP with IPAA recipients and compare ulcerative colitis [UC]-indicated RP with IPAA patients to medically treated UC patients. METHODS: This study was population based. Demographic, indication, complication and direct cost data were collected via medical records while disability, quality of life [QoL] and indirect costs were measured using questionnaires and structured interviews. De-identified raw data about medically treated UC patients were provided by a previous study for comparison. RESULTS: In total there were 136 RP with IPAA patients [mean 11.5 years of follow up]. Eighty-four completed the IBD-DI and 80 completed the IBD questionnaire [IBDQ]. The IBDQ and IBD-DI were highly correlated [r = 0.84, p < 0.01]. Worse QoL and disability were found in those who had their position affected at work [both p < 0.01] and those who had more than 100 days off work in the last year [p < 0.01 for QoL and p = 0.012 for disability]. Lower QoL and disability scores were associated with higher indirect and total costs [p < 0.01]. UC patients treated with RP with IPAA had less disability than medically treated UC patients [p = 0.04]. CONCLUSIONS: Disability in RP with IPAA recipients can be measured using the IBD-DI. Perioperative complications and high costs of care are associated with higher levels of disability. Disability of RP with IPAA recipients was lower than that of medically managed UC patients.