Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 25(11): 1822-1827, 2019 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980712

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for ulcerative colitis is a high-risk period associated with increased risk of Clostridium difficile infection, thromboembolism, and opiate use. The study aim was to develop and implement a quality-improvement intervention for inpatient ulcerative colitis management that standardizes gastroenterology consultant recommendations and improves delivery of evidence-based care. METHODS: All adult patients hospitalized for ulcerative colitis between July 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, who received intravenous corticosteroids were included. On July 1, 2016, the UCSF Inpatient Ulcerative Colitis Protocol was implemented, featuring standardized core recommendations and a daily checklist for gastroenterology consultant notes, a bundled IBD electronic order set, and an opiate awareness campaign. The composite primary outcome was adherence to all 3 evidence-based care metrics: C. difficile testing performed, pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis ordered, and opiates avoided. RESULTS: Ninety-three ulcerative colitis hospitalizations occurred, including 36 preintervention and 57 postintervention. Age, gender, disease duration, disease extent, and medication use were similar preintervention and postintervention. C. difficile testing was performed in 100% of hospitalizations. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was ordered on 84% of hospital days before intervention compared with 100% after intervention (P ≤ 0.001). Opiates were administered in 67% of preintervention hospitalizations, compared with 53% of postintervention hospitalizations (P = 0.18). The median daily dose of oral morphine equivalents decreased from 12.1 mg before intervention to 0.5 mg after intervention (P = 0.02). The composite outcome of adherence to all 3 metrics was higher after intervention (25% vs. 47%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based inpatient ulcerative colitis management may be optimized with standardized algorithms that reinforce core principles, reduce care variation, and do not require IBD specialists to implement.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
3.
Gastroenterology ; 152(2): 451-462.e2, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27769809

ABSTRACT

The management of the pregnant patient with inflammatory bowel disease is complicated by multiple providers, misinformation, and a disease entity that, particularly when active, can adversely affect pregnancy outcomes. This article seeks to frame the debate on medication safety in pregnancy and lactation using the US Food and Drug Administration's new Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule and the most up-to-date safety information to discuss the risks and benefits of using each class of inflammatory bowel disease medication.


Subject(s)
Aminosalicylic Acids/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Congenital Abnormalities/epidemiology , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Breast Feeding , Drug Labeling , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Risk , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
5.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 45(2): 285-301, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27261899

ABSTRACT

For many women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the illness coincides with their childbearing years. IBD increases the risk of pregnancy complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The multidisciplinary care team should emphasize the importance of medication adherence to achieve preconception disease control and maintain corticosteroid-free remission throughout pregnancy. Medication adjustments to reduce fetal exposure may be considered on an individualized basis in quiescent disease; however, any benefits of such adjustments remain theoretic and there is risk of worsening disease activity. Mode of delivery is determined by obstetric indications, except for women with active perianal disease who should consider cesarean delivery.


Subject(s)
Aminosalicylic Acids/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Infertility, Female/therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biological Products , Breast Feeding , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use , Female , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Infertility, Female/epidemiology , Infertility, Male/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Male , Natalizumab/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Pregnancy Rate
6.
Respir Care ; 61(7): 902-12, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26932381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Delayed mechanical ventilation monitoring may impede recognition of life-threatening acidemia. Coordination of multidisciplinary processes can be improved by using a checklist and time-out procedure. The study objective was to evaluate process-related outcomes after implementation of a post-intubation checklist and time out. METHODS: An observational study of a 24-bed medical ICU in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was conducted from January to December 2011. A random sample of mechanically ventilated adults was selected from the pre-intervention (n = 80) and post-intervention (n = 144) periods. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with an arterial blood gas (ABG) result within 60 min of mechanical ventilation initiation. Secondary outcomes included rates of respiratory acidosis, moderate-severe acidemia (pH <7.25), checklist initiation, and project sustainability. Chi-square analysis was used to evaluate differences in outcomes between time periods. RESULTS: After the intervention, the proportion of subjects with an ABG result within 60 min increased (56% vs 37%, P = .01), and time to ABG result improved (58 min vs 79 min, P = .004). Adjusting for illness severity, the proportion with an ABG result within 60 min remained significantly higher in the post-intervention period (odds ratio 2.42, 95% CI 1.25-4.68, P = .009). Checklist adherence was higher with ICU intubations than for intubations performed outside the ICU (71% vs 27% checklist initiation rate, P < .001). Transfer from referring institutions (23% checklist initiation rate, P = .006) negatively impacted checklist use. Implementation challenges included frequent stakeholder turnover, undefined process ownership, and lack of real-time performance feedback. CONCLUSIONS: A post-intubation checklist and time out improved the timeliness of mechanical ventilation monitoring through more rapid assessment of arterial blood gases. Implementing this peri-intubation procedure may reduce the risks associated with transitioning to full mechanical ventilatory support. Optimal implementation necessitates strategies to surmount organizational and behavioral barriers to change.


Subject(s)
Checklist/methods , Critical Care/standards , Intubation/standards , Quality Improvement , Respiration, Artificial/standards , Aged , Blood Gas Analysis , Critical Care/methods , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Intubation/adverse effects , Intubation/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Philadelphia , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Time Factors , Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury/etiology , Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury/prevention & control
7.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 22(1): 213-23, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26444103

ABSTRACT

Immunomodulators and biologic medications, alone or in combination, form the core therapeutic strategy for managing moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD incidence peaks during the prime reproductive years, raising concerns about the impact of disease and its treatment on fertility, maternal and fetal health during pregnancy, breastfeeding safety, and childhood development. Although IBD increases risk of pregnancy complications independent of disease activity, adverse pregnancy outcomes are more common when disease is active. To mitigate fetal risk, women should conceive while disease is quiescent. Aside from methotrexate, immunomodulators and biologics may be used during pregnancy to achieve and maintain disease control. Based on available safety data, there is no increased risk of congenital anomalies among infants exposed to these medications. Active thiopurine metabolites and most monoclonal antibodies cross the placenta and are detectable in neonates. They are detectable in breast milk in minute levels as well. The impact of this exposure on neonatal outcomes is discussed. Adjusted dosing schedules during gestation may reduce fetal drug exposure, though the maternal risks of such manipulation require careful consideration. Ongoing prospective studies will further inform risk assessment, including for newer medications such as the anti-integrin agents.


Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/physiopathology , Pregnancy Outcome
8.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 19(12): 2625-33, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24108113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with Crohn's disease who have loss of response to the anti-tumor necrosis factor α medication infliximab is uncertain. Natalizumab has an alternative mechanism of action, but its use has been limited by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. In this study, we performed a decision analysis assessing the impact of JC virus (JCV) antibody testing and natalizumab utilization for loss of response to infliximab. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model to assess the difference between unscreened natalizumab use (option 1), JCV antibody testing with natalizumab when appropriate (option 2), and second anti-tumor necrosis factor α use (option 3). The base case was a 35-year-old man with severe Crohn's disease with loss of response to infliximab. The time horizon was 3 years. Results are reported in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Deterministic and probabilistic analyses were conducted. Markov analysis using a cohort of 5000 individuals was performed. The impact of JCV antibody status on outcomes in this model was assessed. RESULTS: Option 2 was the preferred strategy (2.0880 QALYs), followed by option 1 (2.0875 QALYs) and option 3 (2.0808 QALYs). Patients in option 2 required fewer surgeries compared with option 3. Previous JCV infection was associated with reduced QALYs with all options that allowed for natalizumab use. CONCLUSIONS: JCV antibody testing and subsequent treatment selection yield improved outcomes over natalizumab without testing or using only a second anti-tumor necrosis factor α in all patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Crohn Disease/drug therapy , JC Virus/immunology , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/diagnosis , Adult , Crohn Disease/immunology , Crohn Disease/virology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infliximab , JC Virus/drug effects , JC Virus/isolation & purification , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/chemically induced , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal/virology , Male , Markov Chains , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
9.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 76(5): 993-1002, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Computer-based endoscopy simulators may enable trainees to learn and develop technical skills before performing on patients. Simulators require validation as adequate models of live endoscopy before being used for training or assessment purposes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate content and criterion validity of the CAE EndoscopyVR Simulator colonoscopy and EGD modules as predictors of clinical endoscopic skills. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, non-randomized, parallel cohort study. SETTING: Single academic center with accredited gastroenterology training program. PARTICIPANTS: Five novice first-year gastroenterology fellows and 6 expert gastroenterology attending physicians. INTERVENTION: Participants performed 18 simulated colonoscopies and 6 simulated EGDs. The simulator recorded objective performance parameters. Participants then completed feedback surveys. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The 57 objective performance parameters measured by the endoscopy simulator were compared between the two study groups. Novice and expert survey responses were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences between novice and expert performance were detected in only 19 of 57 (33%) performance metrics. Eight of these 19 (42%) were time-related metrics, such as total procedure time, time to anatomic landmarks, and time spent in contact with GI mucosa. Of 49 non-time related measures, the few additional statistically significant differences between novices and experts involved air insufflation, sedation management, endoscope force, and patient comfort. These findings are of uncertain clinical significance. Survey data found multiple aspects of the simulation to be unrealistic compared with human endoscopy. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSION: The CAE EndoscopyVR Simulator displays poor content and criterion validity and is thereby incapable of predicting skill during in vivo endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Education, Medical, Graduate/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/education , Gastroenterology/education , Attitude of Health Personnel , Colonoscopy/education , Colonoscopy/standards , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/standards , Fellowships and Scholarships , Humans , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
10.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 107(4): 496-500, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22475957

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Significant advances have been made in clinical and epidemiologic research methods over the past 30 years. We sought to demonstrate the impact of these advances on published gastroenterology research from 1980 to 2010. METHODS: Twenty original clinical articles were randomly selected from each of three journals from 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010. Each article was assessed for topic, whether the outcome was clinical or physiologic, study design, sample size, number of authors and centers collaborating, reporting of various statistical methods, and external funding. RESULTS: From 1980 to 2010, there was a significant increase in analytic studies, clinical outcomes, number of authors per article, multicenter collaboration, sample size, and external funding. There was increased reporting of P values, confidence intervals, and power calculations, and increased use of large multicenter databases, multivariate analyses, and bioinformatics. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity of clinical gastroenterology and hepatology research has increased dramatically, highlighting the need for advanced training of clinical investigators.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/education , Biomedical Research/trends , Gastroenterology/education , Gastroenterology/trends , Professional Competence , Research Design/trends , Research Personnel/education , Epidemiology/education , Humans , Research Personnel/supply & distribution , Research Support as Topic/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...