Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Kennedy Inst Ethics J ; 29(1): 51-66, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31080177

ABSTRACT

LeRoy Walters was at the center of public debate about emerging biological technologies, even as "biotechnology" began to take root. He chaired advisory panels on human gene therapy, the human genome project, and patenting DNA for the congressional Office of Technology Assessment. He chaired the subcommittee on Human Gene Therapy for NIH's Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee. He was also a regular advisor to Congress, the executive branch, and academics concerned about policy governing emerging biotechnologies. In large part due to Prof. Walters, the Kennedy Institute of Ethics was one of the primary sources of talent in bioethics, including staff who populated policy and science agencies dealing with reproductive and genetic technologies, such as NIH and OTA. His legacy lies not only in his writings, but in those people, documents, and discussions that guided biotechnology policy in the United States for three decades.


Subject(s)
Bioethical Issues , Bioethics , Biotechnology/ethics , Genetics/ethics , Academies and Institutes/ethics , Advisory Committees/ethics , Advisory Committees/history , Advisory Committees/legislation & jurisprudence , Biotechnology/history , Biotechnology/trends , DNA, Recombinant/history , Federal Government , Genetic Therapy/ethics , Genetic Therapy/history , Genetic Therapy/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetics/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Human Genome Project/ethics , Human Genome Project/history , Human Genome Project/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Legislation as Topic , Male , Public Policy/history , Public Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 105(46): 17908-12, 2008 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19001265

ABSTRACT

The only causative treatment for IgE-mediated allergies is allergen-specific immunotherapy. However, fewer than 5% of allergy patients receive immunotherapy because of its long duration and risk of allergic side effects. We aimed at enhancing s.c. immunotherapy by direct administration of allergen into s.c. lymph nodes. The objective was to evaluate safety and efficacy compared with conventional s.c. immunotherapy. In a monocentric open-label trial, 165 patients with grass pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis were randomized to receive either 54 s.c. injections with pollen extract over 3 years [cumulative allergen dose 4,031,540 standardized quality units (SQ-U)] or 3 intralymphatic injections over 2 months (cumulative allergen dose 3,000 SQ-U). Patients were evaluated after 4 months, 1 year, and 3 years by nasal provocation, skin prick testing, IgE measurements, and symptom scores. Three low-dose intralymphatic allergen administrations increased tolerance to nasal provocation with pollen already within 4 months (P < 0.001). Tolerance was long lasting and equivalent to that achievable after standard s.c. immunotherapy (P = 0.291 after 3 years). Intralymphatic immunotherapy ameliorated hay fever symptoms (P < 0.001), reduced skin prick test reactivity (P < 0.001), decreased specific serum IgE (P < 0.001), caused fewer adverse events than s.c. immunotherapy (P = 0.001), enhanced compliance (P < 0.001), and was less painful than venous puncture (P = 0.018). In conclusion, intralymphatic allergen administration enhanced safety and efficacy of immunotherapy and reduced treatment time from 3 years to 8 weeks.


Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Allergens/therapeutic use , Desensitization, Immunologic , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Allergens/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/drug therapy , Immune Tolerance/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Injections, Intralymphatic/adverse effects , Injections, Subcutaneous/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/immunology , Skin Tests , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Curr Issues Mol Biol ; 5(4): 123-7, 2003 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12921227

ABSTRACT

Genomic technologies are best defined as technologies used to manipulate and analyze genomic information. The evolution of this collective power began in earnest with the invention of DNA cloning in the 1970's and most of the technology derives from the last quarter of the 20th century. The historical impact of these technologies is clearly immense. With the genome sequence becoming available for many organisms, including humans, another new view of biology has recently emerged. This review examines the shape and texture of this recent evolution, with a particular emphasis on new technology: DNA cloning, macromolecular structure analysis (X-ray crystallography and NMR), DNA sequencing, DNA synthesis, amplification by the polymerase chain reaction, and transgenic animals (bacteria through mammals).


Subject(s)
Genetic Techniques , Genomics , Animals , Cloning, Molecular , Crystallography, X-Ray , Genetic Techniques/history , Genetic Techniques/trends , Genomics/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...