Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Microbiol Methods ; 47(3): 355-68, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11714526

ABSTRACT

Rhodococcus coprophilus, a natural inhabitant of herbivore faeces, has been suggested as a good indicator of animal (as opposed to human) faecal contamination of aquatic environments. However, conventional detection methods limit its use for this as they require up to 21 days to obtain a result. In this paper an optimised method for extracting R. coprophilus DNA from faecal samples is described. PCR and 5'-nuclease (TaqMan) PCR methods were developed to allow the detection and enumeration of R. coprophilus in faecal samples within 2-3 days. Both PCR methods targeted the 16S rRNA gene, producing an amplicon of 443 bp which was specific for R. coprophilus. Sixty cells were required to produce an amplification product by conventional PCR, while as little as one cell was required for the TaqMan PCR method. The latter approach gave a linear quantitative response over at least four log units with both bacterial cells and DNA. Successful amplification by PCR was achieved using DNA extracted from cow, sheep, horse and deer faeces but was negative for samples from humans, pig, possum, duck and rabbit. These PCR methods enhance the feasibility of using R. coprophilus to distinguish faecal pollution of farmed herbivores from human pollution.


Subject(s)
Feces/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Rhodococcus/isolation & purification , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Cattle , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , DNA, Ribosomal/analysis , Deer , Ducks , Horses , Humans , Opossums , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , RNA, Bacterial/analysis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/isolation & purification , Rhodococcus/classification , Rhodococcus/growth & development , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sheep , Swine , Taq Polymerase
2.
J Appl Microbiol ; 91(1): 38-46, 2001 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11442712

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To use a published polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for the detection and identification of thermotolerant Campylobacter species (Camp. jejuni, Camp. coli and Camp. lari) in tandem with a Most Probable Number (MPN) technique to enumerate these species in water samples. METHODS AND RESULTS: An initial study of 42 river water samples compared the use of conventional culture and PCR methods for the detection of Campylobacter in MPN enrichment tubes. It was found that all samples positive by culture were also positive by PCR. Thirty-seven percent more MPN tubes were positive by PCR compared with culture. The MPN/PCR technique was subsequently applied to 96 additional samples collected from rivers, drinking, roof and shallow ground water. Campylobacter was especially prevalent in river water (60% positive) and shallow ground water (75% positive) samples. Drinking water (29.2% positive) and roof water (37.5% positive) also contained Campylobacter, but the numbers detected were very low (maximum 0.3 and 0.56 MPN 100 ml-1, respectively). CONCLUSION: River waters contained Campylobacter at higher levels than any other water type and in a high percentage of the samples. Although Campylobacter was present in treated drinking water, the levels detected were low. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These results suggest that water may act as a significant transmission route for human campylobacteriosis.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Water Microbiology , Campylobacter/genetics , New Zealand , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Temperature , Water
3.
J Appl Microbiol ; 90(4): 614-21, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11309074

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To develop a 24-h system for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in ham. METHODS AND RESULTS: An immunomagnetic separation (IMS) of bacteria directly from ham followed by extraction of DNA and detection using a new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used. The PCR method used one primer pair targeted at the listeriolysin O gene of L. monocytogenes and the other pair for a region of the 23S rRNA genes of Listeria, giving products of 706 and 239 bp, respectively. The combined IMS/PCR was calculated to be capable of detecting as few as 1.1 L. monocytogenes cells g-1 in a 25-g ham sample. CONCLUSION: The process produced acceptable results, but the IMS step is the main barrier to further improvement of sensitivity. The DNA isolation was the most time-consuming step in the process. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: A 24-h test for the presence of L. monocytogenes will be useful to the food industry and significantly assist in the timely investigation of outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Immunomagnetic Separation/methods , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Meat Products/microbiology , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Quality Control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...