Outcomes associated with empiric cefepime for bloodstream infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant, cefepime-susceptible Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime is a first-line agent for empiric sepsis therapy; however, cefepime use may be associated with increased mortality for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) in an MIC-dependent manner. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of empiric cefepime versus meropenem for bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae with cefepime MICs ≤ 2 mg/L. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients admitted from October 2010 to August 2020 who received cefepime or meropenem empirically for sepsis with a blood culture growing ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints included 14-day mortality, recurrent BSI, readmission and recurrent infection within 90 days, time to clinical resolution of infection, time to clinical stability, and clinical stability at 48 hours. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria: 36 received meropenem and 18 received cefepime. The median (IQR) treatment durations of cefepime and meropenem were 3 (2-6) days and 7 (5-10) days, respectively. Thirty-day and 14-day mortality were similar between cefepime and meropenem (11.1% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.255 and 5.6% vs. 2.8%; P = 1.00, respectively). Cefepime was associated with longer time to clinical stability compared with meropenem (median 38.48 hours vs. 21.26; P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Mortality was similar between groups, although most patients who received cefepime empirically were ultimately transitioned to a carbapenem to complete the full treatment course. Empiric cefepime was associated with a delay in achieving clinical stability when compared with meropenem to treat BSI caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales, even when cefepime-susceptible.

Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated With Use of Hydroxychloroquine With or Without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

IMPORTANCE: Administration of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pneumonia carries increased risk of corrected QT (QTc) prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk and degree of QT prolongation in patients with COVID-19 in association with their use of hydroxychloroquine with or without concomitant azithromycin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cohort study performed at an academic tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts, of patients hospitalized with at least 1 positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction test result and clinical findings consistent with pneumonia who received at least 1 day of hydroxychloroquine from March 1, 2020, through April 7, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in QT interval after receiving hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin; occurrence of other potential adverse drug events. RESULTS: Among 90 patients given hydroxychloroquine, 53 received concomitant azithromycin; 44 (48.9%) were female, and the mean (SD) body mass index was 31.5 (6.6). Hypertension (in 48 patients [53.3%]) and diabetes mellitus (in 26 patients [28.9%]) were the most common comorbid conditions. The overall median (interquartile range) baseline QTc was 455 (430-474) milliseconds (hydroxychloroquine, 473 [454-487] milliseconds vs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, 442 [427-461] milliseconds; P < .001). Those receiving concomitant azithromycin had a greater median (interquartile range) change in QT interval (23 [10-40] milliseconds) compared with those receiving hydroxychloroquine alone (5.5 [-15.5 to 34.25] milliseconds; P = .03). Seven patients (19%) who received hydroxychloroquine monotherapy developed prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds or more, and 3 patients (8%) had a change in QTc of 60 milliseconds or more. Of those who received concomitant azithromycin, 11 of 53 (21%) had prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds or more and 7 of 53 (13 %) had a change in QTc of 60 milliseconds or more. The likelihood of prolonged QTc was greater in those who received concomitant loop diuretics (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38 [95% CI, 1.03-11.08]) or had a baseline QTc of 450 milliseconds or more (adjusted odds ratio, 7.11 [95% CI, 1.75-28.87]). Ten patients had hydroxychloroquine discontinued early because of potential adverse drug events, including intractable nausea, hypoglycemia, and 1 case of torsades de pointes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, patients who received hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of pneumonia associated with COVID-19 were at high risk of QTc prolongation, and concurrent treatment with azithromycin was associated with greater changes in QTc. Clinicians should carefully weigh risks and benefits if considering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, with close monitoring of QTc and concomitant medication usage.

Leflunomide-associated skin ulceration.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of skin ulceration as a result of treatment with leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old white woman developed bilateral leg ulcers after 6 months of treatment with leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis. A history of leg ulcers after methotrexate therapy had been documented. Serologic and diagnostic tests did not support an alternate process. Other medications prescribed were oral ethinyl estradiol 0.05 mg/d, felodipine 5 mg/d, and paroxetine 20 mg/d, for which no documented correlation with the skin breakdown could be made. DISCUSSION: This is the first published case describing a possible relationship between the use of the immunosuppressant agent leflunomide and skin ulceration. CONCLUSIONS: Skin breakdown and ulceration is a recognized adverse effect of drugs with immunosuppressant activity such as methotrexate. Leflunomide, a newer agent prescribed in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, may now be listed among the drugs in this category associated with this adverse drug effect.