Clinical and Financial Outcomes Evaluation of Multimodal Pharmacist Warfarin Management of a Statewide Urban and Rural Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and indirect financial outcomes of pharmacist face-to-face warfarin management with telephone-based distance management utilizing local laboratories or patient self-testing (PST). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a clinic population of 336 patients on established warfarin therapy distributed statewide in rural and urban settings over a 6-month period was conducted. Participants were stratified into face-to-face management, telephone-based management utilizing local laboratory testing, and telephone-based management utilizing PST. RESULTS: The primary outcome of international normalized ratio (INR) time in therapeutic range (TTR) for face-to-face management was significantly greater than distance management utilizing local laboratory testing (69.0% vs 60.5%, P = .0032). No difference was observed between face-to-face management and PST (69.0% vs 68.0%, P = .25). No significant difference in bleeding or thromboses was observed. Although increased clinician time was utilized during face-to-face encounters compared to telephone encounters (8.7-minute face-to-face, 5.5-minute local laboratory, and 5.4-minute PST), face-to-face encounters tended to be billable at lower levels, whereas telephone-based encounters were billable at higher levels. CONCLUSION: A multimodal approach to pharmacist warfarin management of a patient population distributed statewide in rural and urban locations is effective despite TTR differences associated with INR testing used in distance management. PST may improve warfarin treatment outcomes and adherence in distance management, particularly when the use of alternative oral anticoagulants is inappropriate. Although time and billing differences between face-to-face and distance management exist, clinical and safety outcomes remain acceptable despite encounter complexity and support reimbursement of pharmacist anticoagulation management in all settings.

Comparing Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Clinic to Usual Physician-Based Care.

BACKGROUND: This study analyzed the impact of a pharmacist-managed diabetes clinic on clinical outcomes compared to usual care received from primary care providers (PCPs). This comparison may more definitively demonstrate the value of pharmacist management of chronic disease states. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study conducted in patients referred to a pharmacist-managed pharmacotherapy (PT) clinic from July 2009 to October 2014. RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the absolute change in A1c during the usual care phase was +1.53% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.96, P < .0001) versus an absolute change of -1.63% (95% CI: -1.28 to -1.97, P < .0001) in the intervention phase. For secondary outcomes, diabetes-related hospitalizations (10 vs 6, P = .104) and emergency room (ER) visits (27 vs 8, P = .049) decreased in the intervention phase compared to the usual care phase. The rate of diabetes-related interventions made per patient per year in the usual care phase was 2.7 versus 11.1 in the intervention phase ( P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Patients referred to the PT clinic had worsening blood glucose control prior to referral, and their control improved after referral to the clinic. Furthermore, there was an improvement in all diabetes-related outcomes in the intervention phase compared to the usual care phase.

Screening for Beta-Lactam Allergy in Joint Arthroplasty Patients to Improve Surgical Prophylaxis Practice.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of patient-reported penicillin allergies has been disputed. A Drug Allergy Clinic (DAC) was established at our institution in combination with an electronic best practice alert (BPA) in the Orthopedic Clinic. Joint arthroplasty patients with a reported history of beta-lactam allergy (HOBA) were preoperatively referred via the BPA to the DAC. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of beta-lactam allergy screening in enabling the surgical team to optimize antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS: Between February 2013 and May 2015, 161 patients with a HOBA were referred to the DAC where they underwent penicillin skin testing (PST), a drug challenge to a beta-lactam antibiotic, and/or had no intervention depending on the history obtained. RESULTS: PST was performed on 140 of 161 (87%) patients. A negative PST was noted in 139 (99%) patients, indicating no penicillin allergy. Cefazolin was safe to use in 145 (90%) patients evaluated. Significantly more patients evaluated in the DAC vs those not seen got cefazolin in any surgical prophylaxis regimen (90% vs 77%) without any adverse perioperative reactions. Concurrently, the use of non-beta-lactam antibiotics was significantly less in the patients evaluated vs not evaluated (16% vs 27%). The overall use of cefazolin in orthopedic surgeries in patients with HOBA was >84% over the course of the study period. CONCLUSION: Beta-lactam allergy screening using a BPA and a DAC promotes the use of standard surgical prophylaxis with cefazolin. Joint arthroplasty surgeons should consider implementing allergy screening programs to promote antimicrobial stewardship.

Evaluation of dosing and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing conversion of insulin glargine to insulin detemir.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the dose and frequency of insulin detemir for patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing conversion from insulin glargine to insulin detemir, and to assess glycemic control, weight gain, and risk of hypoglycemia after converting to insulin detemir. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-one patients with type 1 (10 patients) or type 2 (21 patients) diabetes who were converted from insulin glargine to insulin detemir by usual practice between January 1, 2006, and March 3, 2007, after an Iowa Medicaid formulary switch. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Data were collected for 12 months after conversion from insulin glargine to insulin detemir. No significant change in mean basal insulin dose was noted in patients with type 1 diabetes at the end of 12 months (insulin detemir 31.1 units/day vs baseline insulin glargine 32.0 units/day, p=0.89; insulin detemir 0.41 unit/kg/day vs baseline insulin glargine 0.42 unit/kg/day, p=0.91). In patients with type 2 diabetes, however, the mean basal insulin dose was significantly higher with insulin detemir compared with baseline insulin glargine (74.2 vs 55.8 units/day, p=0.002; 0.68 vs 0.48 unit/kg/day, p=0.001) at the end of 12 months. Twice-daily administration was required in a higher proportion of patients receiving insulin detemir (15 patients [48%]) at 12 months compared with insulin glargine (4 patients [13%]) at baseline (p=0.043). A significant change in hemoglobin A(1c) was not observed in patients with type 1 diabetes (9.7% with insulin detemir vs 9.3% with insulin glargine, p=0.41) or type 2 diabetes (9.4% with insulin detemir vs 9.7% with insulin glargine at baseline, p=0.57) despite the use of higher insulin detemir doses in patients with type 2 diabetes. No significant differences in weight or frequency of hypoglycemia were noted. CONCLUSION: Treatment with insulin detemir appears to require more frequent administration and higher insulin doses compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes, with 33% higher doses, on average, observed in this study. These findings suggest that a unit-for-unit conversion from insulin glargine to insulin detemir, as suggested by the manufacturer of insulin detemir, may not be adequate in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Special considerations for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The intensity and selection of therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in elderly patients are discussed. SUMMARY: Glycemic control is fundamental in diabetes care; however, as glycemic goals are approached, the risk of hypoglycemia increases. This risk is even greater in the elderly due to many predisposing factors, including renal insufficiency, polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, comorbidities, irregular meal patterns, and infrequent self-monitoring of blood glucose. When deciding on the desired intensity of diabetes treatment, the risk of hypoglycemic complications must be weighed against the potential benefit of reducing microvascular and macrovascular complications. Three large-scale, randomized controlled trials examining the effects of intensive versus standard glycemic control on microvascular and macrovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes have been published in recent years. In general, a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) goal of <7% is reasonable for most patients. A less-aggressive goal may be considered for patients at high risk of hypoglycemia or high risk of complications from hypoglycemia, as long as acutely symptomatic hyperglycemia is avoided. Chlorpropamide, glyburide, and rosiglitazone, which pose a great risk for hypoglycemia, should be avoided in the elderly. CONCLUSION: In the absence of clear evidence advocating strict glycemic targets goal of <7% is for elderly patients, an HbA(1c) reasonable for most patients; however, the risk of hypoglycemic complications must be weighed against the potential benefit of reducing microvascular and macrovascular disease. Metformin may be used as first-line therapy, but chlorpropamide and glyburide, which pose a great risk for hypoglycemia, should be avoided in the elderly. Due to increased cardiovascular risk, use of rosiglitazone in the elderly should also be avoided.

Risks and benefits of long-term bisphosphonate therapy.

PURPOSE: The risks and benefits of long-term bisphosphonate therapy were reviewed. SUMMARY: Bisphosphonates are used first line in the treatment of osteoporosis due to their demonstrated ability to reduce the risk of fracture. Benefits on bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture prevention appear to be sustained for 7-10 years; however, the lack of clinical trials extending beyond this treatment period has raised the question of how long therapy should be continued. Furthermore, some reports have suggested the potential for an increased risk of fragility fractures due to oversuppression of bone turnover with long-term bisphosphonate use. Though rare, these fragility fractures appear to have a specific fracture pattern and tend to occur after 3-8 years of bisphosphonate therapy. The use of a drug holiday has been considered as an option to avoid this risk. Data suggest that bisphosphonates have a residual therapeutic effect after being stopped and that fracture benefit appears to be sustained 2-5 years after discontinuation. This sustained benefit, however, was observed only in women with good adherence who were treated with bisphosphonate therapy for at least 2 years and whose BMD was not in the osteoporotic range before discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The benefits of long-term bisphosphonate therapy in patients at high risk of fracture likely outweigh the risks. In lower risk patients, such as those with a BMD in the osteopenic or normal range after two to five years of treatment and no history of fracture, consideration could be given to stopping therapy for two to five years.

Metformin use in renal dysfunction: is a serum creatinine threshold appropriate?

PURPOSE: The relationship among metformin use, plasma lactate levels, and lactic acidosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and the appropriateness of metformin use in patients with renal dysfunction are discussed. SUMMARY: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes recommends metformin therapy as first-line therapy along with lifestyle modification to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite this recommendation, metformin may be underutilized due to the fear of metformin-associated lactic acidosis and because its use is contraindicated in patients with renal dysfunction. Several studies have attempted to characterize the relationship among plasma metformin levels, plasma lactate levels, and lactic acidosis. However, a causal relationship between metformin and lactic acidosis has not been definitively established. In the United States, the estimated rate of lactic acidosis among diabetic patients treated with metformin is similar to that of diabetic patients not taking metformin. Despite specific guidelines advising against prescribing metformin in renal dysfunction, published reports indicate that metformin is continued in 25% of patients after the contraindication is discovered. Individual studies point to a possible correlation between metformin levels and plasma lactate levels, but mortality does not appear to correlate with plasma metformin levels. These results indicate that there may not be a direct relationship between plasma lactate and metformin levels. CONCLUSION: Current studies point to a weak causal relationship between metformin and lactic acidosis. In patients without comorbid conditions that would predispose them to lactic acidosis, elevated serum creatinine levels should be considered a risk factor for the development of lactic acidosis but not an absolute contraindication.

Effect of a pharmacist managed smoking cessation clinic on quit rates.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify quit rates, determine factors predicting success, and analyze patients' perceptions at 3 months after participation in the pharmacist-managed Smoking Cessation Group Clinic. METHODS: This was a prospective, single group study that was conducted in patients that had participated in the Smoking Cessation Group Clinic at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Clinic participants received structured group counseling covering various topics associated with cessation. Varenicline, bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy were used as smoking cessation aids and selection was based on patient preference and absence of contraindications. The primary outcome of this trial was smoking status at 3 months. The patients were contacted by telephone at 3, and 6 months after the start of the clinic and asked about current smoking status. At 3 months, patients were asked to rate on a Likert scale of 1 to 5 (1=not helpful; 5=very helpful) their perceptions of individual aspects of the clinic and on a scale of 1 to 10 (1=not helpful; 10=very helpful) how they perceived their cessation aid. RESULTS: From February 2007 to January 2008, 21 patients enrolled in the intent-to-treat follow up study. Analysis of data was completed in August 2008. At 3 and 6 months, 47.6% and 52.4%, of patients reported being smoke-free, respectively. At 3 months, factors consistent with success included having more previous quit attempts and type of cessation aid used. These endpoints continued to be significant at 6 months, in addition to attending more clinic sessions, and type of insurance (favoring private insurance). Patients who quit smoking rated their cessation aid as more helpful than those who did not quit smoking (8.56; SD=0.88 verses 6.71; SD=2.81, respectively; p=0.14). The aspect of the clinic most helpful to patients was group interaction (4.53; SD=0.77). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that pharmacists can play a vital role with smoking cessation in a group setting. Group setting patient counseling can be an effective tool for pharmacists to reach more people within the same time frame as individual counseling.

Evaluation of anticoagulation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

PURPOSE: The quality of anticoagulation therapy in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was evaluated. SUMMARY: The high risk of unnecessary anticoagulation and recent changes in the recommended International Normalized Ratio (INR) target range prompted a performance-improvement initiative to improve the care of patients with APS within the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics internal medicine and family medicine anticoagulation clinics. Twenty-three patients with an initial diagnosis of APS were evaluated through chart review to determine the anticoagulation indication, occurrence of thromboembolic events, and INR target range. Confirmation of APS diagnosis was made using Sapporo criteria. Recommendations were made to the patients' physicians for confirmatory APS testing and changes in the anticoagulation regimen. INR target ranges were 2.0-3.0, 2.5-3.5, and 2.5-3.0 for 57%, 39%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Only 6 (26%) of the 23 patients met Sapporo criteria for a definite diagnosis of APS. Of the 17 patients (74%) who did not meet these criteria, 8 (47%) had another indication for indefinite anticoagulation. Repeat APS testing was indicated for 7 patients, 5 of whom met Sapporo criteria for APS. A lower target INR range of 2.0-3.0 was determined appropriate for 6 (26%) of the 23 patients evaluated. CONCLUSION: A majority of patients with an initial diagnosis of APS did not meet criteria for a definite diagnosis of APS. Of those patients, approximately half had another indication for long-term anticoagulation, and one third were receiving warfarin dosages based on an INR target range that was higher than clinically indicated.

The linkage between Churg-Strauss syndrome and leukotriene receptor antagonists: fact or fiction?

Epidemiologic evidence has shown that the worldwide prevalence of asthma is increasing. The leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) represent a new class of therapy for asthma. They have been developed in the last decade and play a pivotal steroid-sparing role in treating the inflammatory component of asthma. Consequently, reports of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS), a rare form of systemic vasculitis, have been recognized as a potential side effect in individuals with moderate to severe asthma on LTRA therapy. The serious nature of this disorder is worthy of prompt recognition by clinicians and aggressive therapy to avoid the subsequent longstanding effects of vasculitis. To validate the postulated linkage between the LTRAs and CSS, this review comprehensively evaluates reported cases in the literature and supports a pathophysiological relationship between the LTRAs and the development of CSS.