Large de novo ascending aortic thrombus successfully treated with anticoagulation.

An ascending aortic thrombus is a rare source for embolic transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke without an associated aortic pathology. Here we describe a case of a patient who presented with generalized symptoms of headache and fatigue who, on subsequent work-up , was found to have an ascending aortic thrombus with no obvious associated aortic pathology, and was successfully treated with apixaban, a newer direct oral anticoagulant.

Diminutive Porcelain Ascending Aorta With Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis.

This report describes the case of a 49-year-old man with a medical history significant for congenital aortic stenosis. The patient presented with progressive shortness of breath and decreased stamina and was found to have a concentric, diminutive porcelain ascending aorta with diffuse supravalvular aortic stenosis. We describe treatment with an aortic root augmentation and Bentall procedure using hypothermic circulatory arrest.

Anticoagulation management following left ventricular assist device implantation is similar across all provider strategies.

OBJECTIVES: Thromboembolic and bleeding events are potential complications following left ventricular assist device implantation. A tight control of the international normalized ratio (INR) is believed to be crucial in the reduction of postimplant complications. There is significant variability among institutions as to whether a device implanting centre should be managing the INR. In this study, we evaluated the effect of INR management strategies in maintaining a therapeutic INR. METHODS: A retrospective review was utilized to identify patients implanted with either the HeartMate II or the HeartWare HVAD between January 2011 and February 2016. Patients were stratified into 4 groups based on the post-discharge INR management strategy: outside hospital system anticoagulation clinic, outside hospital primary care provider, implanting centre anticoagulation clinic or implanting centre ventricular assist device office. The INR data were collected and analysed for both the early (discharge, 7, 14, 21 and 30 days) and late (3, 6, 9 and 12 months) postoperative periods. RESULTS: There were 163 patients identified during the study period who met the study inclusion criteria: 49 (30%) patients were managed by an outside hospital system anticoagulation clinic, 59 (36.2%) patients by an outside hospital physician/primary care provider, 22 (13.5%) patients by the implanting centre anticoagulation clinic and 33 (20.2%) patients by the implanting centre ventricular assist device office. There were no statistically significant differences found between management strategies across all time points. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference found between the management strategies examined. Regardless of the chosen INR management strategy, patients have similar INR values and postoperative outcomes.

To ventricular assist devices or not: When is implantation of a ventricular assist device appropriate in advanced ambulatory heart failure?

Advanced heart failure has been traditionally treated via either heart transplantation, continuous inotropes, consideration for hospice and more recently via left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Heart transplantation has been limited by organ availability and the futility of other options has thrust LVAD therapy into the mainstream of therapy for end stage heart failure. Improvements in technology and survival combined with improvements in the quality of life have made LVADs a viable option for many patients suffering from heart failure. The question of when to implant these devices in those patients with advanced, yet still ambulatory heart failure remains a controversial topic. We discuss the current state of LVAD therapy and the risk vs benefit of these devices in the treatment of heart failure.