Infection prevention and control lapse involving medical equipment reprocessing at a family medicine clinic in Ottawa, Ontario, 2018.

BACKGROUND: In April 2018, Ottawa Public Health identified a large-scale infection prevention and control (IPAC) lapse spanning 15 years related to inadequate reprocessing of reusable critical medical equipment used in a family medicine clinic. OBJECTIVES: To describe the public health response to, and estimate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission from, this IPAC lapse. METHODS: Patients who underwent a procedure of concern (during which reusable equipment may have been used) at this clinic were identified using Ontario Health Insurance Plan data and individually notified. Testing for HBV, HCV and HIV at the Public Health Ontario Laboratory was recommended, and the odds of infection were estimated. RESULTS: Of 4,495 patients possibly exposed to improperly reprocessed equipment, 1,496 (33.3%) underwent testing within six months of notification. The prevalence of HBV, HCV and HIV infection in this group was lower than in the general Canadian population. Among patients first diagnosed with HBV after a procedure of concern, the odds of HBV transmission were not increased when the procedure occurred within seven or 28 days of another patient with a positive HBV test result (OR7 days, age-adjusted=0.59, 95% CI: 0.14-2.51; OR28 days, age-adjusted=1.35, 95% CI: 0.62-2.93). The odds of HCV and HIV transmission could not be estimated because no patient was diagnosed with HCV or HIV after having a procedure of concern within 28 days of another patient with a positive HCV or HIV test result. CONCLUSION: We found no evidence of HBV, HCV or HIV transmission associated with this IPAC lapse. However, transmission cannot be ruled out conclusively because only a third of possibly exposed patients underwent testing.

Public health response to a large-scale endoscopy infection control lapse in a nonhospital clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether transmission of blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) (hepatitis B virus [HBV], hepatitis C virus [HCV] and HIV) occurred as a result of endoscopy reprocessing failures identified during an inspection of a nonhospital endoscopy clinic in 2011. METHODS: The present analysis was a retrospective cohort study. Registered notification letters were mailed to 6992 patients who underwent endoscopy from 2002 to 2011 at one Canadian nonhospital endoscopy clinic, informing them of the infection control lapse and offering BBP testing. Multimedia communications and a telephone line supplemented notification. A retrospective study of patients with BBPs was performed with viral genetic testing and risk factor assessment for eligible patients. Risk for infection among patients whose procedure was within seven days of a known positive patient was compared with those whose procedure was performed more than seven days after a known postive patient. The seven-day period was selected as the period most likely to present a risk for transmission based on the documented cleaning procedures at the clinic and the available literature on virus survival. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (6628 of 6992) of patients/estates were contacted and 5042 of 6728 (75%) living patients completed BBP testing. Three were newly diagnosed with HBV and 14 with HCV. Twenty-three and 48 tested positive for previously known HBV or HCV, respectively, 367 were immune to HBV due to natural infection and one was immune to HBV due to immunization. None tested positive for HIV. Sequencing did not reveal any relationships among the 46 unique case patients with viral genetic test results available. Ninety-three percent of patients reported alternative risk factors for BBP. An increased risk for infection among those who underwent a procedure within seven days of a known HBV or HCV case was not demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy reprocessing failures were not associated with an increased risk for BBP among individuals tested.

OBJECTIF: Lors de l'inspection d'une clinique d'endoscopie non hospitalière en 2011, déterminer si des pathogènes à diffusion hématogène (PDH; virus de l'hépatite B [VHB], virus de l'hépatite C [VHC] et VIH) sont transmis à cause de la défaillance du retraitement de l'endoscopie. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Dans la présente étude de cohorte rétrospective, les chercheurs ont posté une lettre recommandée à 6 992 patients qui avaient subi une endoscopie entre 2002 et 2011 dans une clinique canadienne d'endoscopie non hospitalière pour les informer d'une défaillance du contrôle des infections et leur offrir un test de dépistage des PDH. Les communications multimédias et les appels téléphoniques ont complété cet avis. Les chercheurs ont effectué une étude rétrospective des patients ayant des PDH au moyen de tests génétiques viraux et d'une évaluation des facteurs de risque des patients admissibles. Ils ont comparé le risque d'infection entre les patients dont l'intervention avait eu lieu dans les sept jours suivant celle d'un patient positif connu ceux dont l'intervalle dépassait sept jours. Cette période de sept jours était la plus susceptible de constituer un risque de transmission compte tenu des mesures de nettoyage attestées à la clinique et les publications sur la survie des virus. RÉSULTATS: Les chercheurs ont pris contact avec 95 % (6 628 cas sur 6 692) des patients et des successions, et 5 042 des 6 728 (75 %) patients vivants ont effectué le test de dépistage des PDH. Trois ont obtenu un nouveau diagnostic de VHB et 14, de VHC. De plus, 23 et 48 ont obtenu des résultats positifs à un VHB ou à un VHC déjà connu, respectivement, 367 étaient immuns au VHB en raison d'une infection naturelle et un, grâce à la vaccination. Aucun n'a obtenu de résultat positif au VIH. Le séquençage a révélé l'absence de lien entre les 46 cas uniques de patients pour qui les résultats du test génétique étaient disponibles. Aussi, 93 % des patients ont signalé d'autres facteurs de risques de PDH. Par ailleurs, on n'a pu démontrer d'augmentation du risque d'infection chez les personnes qui avaient subi une intervention dans les sept jours suivant un cas connu de VHB ou de VHC. CONCLUSIONS: L'échec de retraitement de l'endoscopie ne s'associait pas à une augmentation du risque de PDH chez les personnes qui subissaient un test de dépistage.

Active tuberculosis among homeless persons, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1998-2007.

While tuberculosis (TB) in Canadian cities is increasingly affecting foreign-born persons, homeless persons remain at high risk. To assess trends in TB, we studied all homeless persons in Toronto who had a diagnosis of active TB during 1998-2007. We compared Canada-born and foreign-born homeless persons and assessed changes over time. We identified 91 homeless persons with active TB; they typically had highly contagious, advanced disease, and 19% died within 12 months of diagnosis. The proportion of homeless persons who were foreign-born increased from 24% in 1998-2002 to 39% in 2003-2007. Among foreign-born homeless persons with TB, 56% of infections were caused by strains not known to circulate among homeless persons in Toronto. Only 2% of infections were resistant to first-line TB medications. The rise in foreign-born homeless persons with TB strains likely acquired overseas suggests that the risk for drug-resistant strains entering the homeless shelter system may be escalating.

A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of chiropractic and medical prophylactic treatment of adults with tension-type headache: results from a stopped trial.

OBJECTIVES: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common headache experienced by adults in Western society. Only 2 clinical trials of spinal manipulation for adult tension-type headache have been reported, neither of which was fully controlled. In 1 trial, spinal manipulation was compared to amitriptyline. There is an urgent need for well-controlled studies of chiropractic spinal manipulation for TTH. This trial was stopped prematurely due to poor recruitment. The purposes of this report are (1) to describe the trial protocol, as it contained several novel features, (2) to report the limited data set obtained from our sample of completed subjects, and (3) to discuss the problems that were encountered in conducting this study. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with a factorial design in which adult TTH sufferers with more than 10 headaches per month were randomly assigned to four groups: real cervical manipulation + real amitriptyline, real cervical manipulation + placebo amitriptyline, sham cervical manipulation + real amitriptyline, and sham cervical manipulation + placebo amitriptyline. A baseline period of four weeks was followed by a treatment period of 14 weeks. The primary outcome was headache frequency obtained from a headache diary in the last 28 days of the treatment period. RESULTS: Nineteen subjects completed the trial. In the unadjusted analysis, a statistically significant main effect of chiropractic treatment was obtained (-2.2 [-10.2 to 5.8], P = .03) which was just below the 3-day reduction set for clinical importance. As well, a clinically important [corrected] effect of the combined therapies was obtained (-9 [-20.8 [corrected] to 2.9], P = .13), but this did not achieve statistical significance. In the adjusted analysis, neither the main effects of chiropractic nor amitriptyline were statistically significant or clinically important; however, the effect of the combined treatments was -8.4 (-15.8 to -1.1) which was statistically significant (P = .03) and reached our criterion for clinical importance. CONCLUSION: Although the sample size was smaller than initially required, a statistically significant and clinically important effect was obtained for the combined treatment group. There are considerable difficulties with recruitment of subjects in such a trial. This trial should be replicated with a larger sample.