Generalized hypervigilance in fibromyalgia: evidence of perceptual amplification.

The hypervigilance model of pain perception states that chronic pain patients have a heightened sensitivity to pain (e.g. low threshold and tolerance) because of increased attention to external stimulation and a preoccupation with pain sensations. This study tested the hypothesis that individuals with fibromyalgia, a chronic pain disorder of undetermined origin, have a generalized hypervigilant pattern of responding that extends beyond the pain domain. Twenty fibromyalgia out-patients, 20 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and 20 normal controls served as subjects. The RA and normal control subjects were age and sex matched to the fibromyalgia patients. Subjects were tested for pain tolerance, pain threshold, and noise tolerance and were asked to complete a number of questionnaires that assessed hypervigilance. As predicted, the responses of the fibromyalgia patients to both the pain and auditory stimuli were consistent with the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis. These patients had significantly lower threshold and tolerance values than the RA patients, who in turn, had lower values than the normal control subjects. The results of the psychological questionnaires revealed that the fibromyalgia and RA patients preferred lower levels of external stimulation than the control subjects. The outcome of this study supports the generalized hypervigilance hypothesis, suggesting that fibromyalgia patients have a perceptual style of amplification. The implications of these findings for understanding the role of biological, cognitive, and perceptual factors in pain disorders are discussed.

The effect of litigation status on adjustment to whiplash injury.

STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study examined the effect of civil litigation on reports of pain and disability in chronic pain patients who sustained whiplash injuries after a motor vehicle accident. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of litigation on adjustment to chronic pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A common methodologic weakness with many studies in this area is the composition of the nonlitigant group, which often includes individuals who have completed litigation as well as those who opted not to litigate. This introduces a confound in that litigant and nonlitigant groups differ not only with respect to litigation status but with respect to any factors that predispose one to litigate. METHODS: Questionnaire data were obtained from 41 patients (current litigants) in the process of litigation and 21 patients (postlitigants) who had completed litigation. Subjects completed self-report measures assessing demographic characteristics, psychological distress, sleep disturbance, employment status, and various pain indices. RESULTS: There were no significant group differences in demographic characteristics, employment status, or psychological distress. Litigants, however, reported more pain than did postlitigants. Group differences in pain reports remained statistically significant even after controlling for length of time since accident and initial severity of the injuries. CONCLUSIONS: That litigation status did not predict employment status suggests that secondary gain does not figure prominently in influencing the functionality of these patients. The rather robust effect of litigation status on pain reports is discussed with respect to the potential mediational role of the stress of litigation.

The reliability of examination for tenderness in patients with myofascial pain, chronic fibromyalgia and controls.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the reliability with which tenderness could be evaluated in patients with chronic myalgias, using dolorimetry and palpation. METHODS: Three blinded examiners using pressure dolorimetry and digital palpation compared 19 paired tender points and 8 paired control points in 4 matched groups of 6 patients with fibromyalgia (FM), myofascial pain, pain controls, and healthy controls. RESULTS: Good interrater and test-retest reliability were found for dolorimetry scores. There were significant differences in tenderness ratings by dolorimetry between the diagnostic groups, with the patients with FM and myofascial pain having the greatest tenderness, the normals having the least tenderness, and the pain controls having tenderness levels midway between the patients with FM or myofascial pain and the normals. In all patients, control points had higher pain thresholds than tender points. One-third of patients with localized pain complaints demonstrated a significant relationship between region of clinical pain complaint and measured tenderness thresholds by dolorimetry. In ratings of tenderness by digital palpation, there was very good intrarater reliability over 26 of 27 paired points, and good interrater reliability at 75% of the points. One-half of patients with localized pain complaints demonstrated a significant relationship between region of clinical pain complaint and number of tender points by palpation. CONCLUSION: Both dolorimetry and palpation are sufficiently reliable to discriminate control patients from patients with myofascial pain and FM, but may not discriminate patients with myofascial pain from those with FM. Neither method appears to correlate well with the location of the clinical pain complaint, regardless of diagnosis.

The impact of contextual cues on the interpretation of and response to physical symptoms: a vignette approach.

This study examined the impact of two contextual cues--stress and aging--on conceptualizations of, and health care responses to, physical symptoms. Eighty-three undergraduates each read four vignettes describing a woman experiencing physical symptoms indicative of either heart attack, depression, ulcer, or flu. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of six age/stress cue combinations. Consistent with predictions, physical symptoms presented with stress cues were less likely to be attributed to acute illness and were seen as more variable. The effect was most pronounced for heart attack symptoms, which, when presented with stress cues, were also less likely (1) to be identified as a heart attack, (2) to be attributed to chronic illness, (3) to elicit recommendations to seek medical care, (4) and to be regarded as serious. The age manipulation did not exert an effect. Implications of these findings and limitations of the vignette approach are discussed.