Checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (pRCC) is the most common non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) and a distinct entity, although heterogenous, associated with poor outcomes. The treatment landscape of metastatic pRCC (mpRCC) relied so far on targeted therapies, mimicking previous developments in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. However, antiangiogenics as well as mTOR inhibitors retain only limited activity in mpRCC. As development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is now underway in patients with mpRCC, we aimed at discussing early activity data and potential for future therapeutic strategies in monotherapy or combination. Expression of immune checkpoints such as PD-L1 and infiltrative immune cells in pRCC could provide insights into their potential immunogenicity, although this is currently poorly described. Based on retrospective and prospective data, efficacy of ICI as single agent remains limited. Combinations with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, notably with anti-MET inhibitors, harbor promising response rates and may enter the standard of care in untreated patients. Collaborative work is needed to refine the molecular and immune landscape of pRCC, and pursue efforts to set up predictive biomarker-driven clinical trials in these rare tumors.

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for the treatment of BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma☆.

BACKGROUND: Approved first-line treatments for patients with BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma include nivolumab (a programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor) plus ipilimumab (a cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitor; NIVO+IPI) and the BRAF/MEK inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib (DAB+TRAM), encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI), and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (VEM+COBI). Results from prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing these treatments have not yet been reported. This analysis evaluated the relative efficacy and safety of NIVO+IPI versus DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review identified RCTs for DAB+TRAM, ENCO+BINI, and VEM+COBI in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Individual patient-level data for NIVO+IPI were derived from the phase III CheckMate 067 trial (BRAF-mutant cohort) and restricted to match the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the comparator trials. Treatment effects for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards and time-varying hazard ratio (HR) models. Safety outcomes (grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events) with NIVO+IPI and the comparators were compared. RESULTS: In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, NIVO+IPI showed improved OS compared with DAB+TRAM (HR = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.73), ENCO+BINI (HR = 0.60; CI, 0.42-0.85), and VEM+COBI (HR = 0.50; CI, 0.36-0.70) for the overall study period. In the time-varying analysis, NIVO+IPI was associated with significant improvements in OS and PFS compared with the BRAF/MEK inhibitors 12 months after treatment initiation. There were no significant differences between NIVO+IPI and BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment from 0 to 12 months. Safety outcomes favored DAB+TRAM over NIVO+IPI, whereas NIVO+IPI was comparable to VEM+COBI. CONCLUSION: Results of this MAIC demonstrated durable OS and PFS benefits for patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma treated with NIVO+IPI compared with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, with the greatest benefits noted after 12 months.

Overall survival by clinical risk category for high dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) treated patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC): data from the PROCLAIMSM registry.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic scoring systems are used to estimate the risk of mortality from metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Outcomes from different therapies may vary within each risk group. These survival algorithms have been applied to assess outcomes in patients receiving T-cell checkpoint inhibitory immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, but have not been applied extensively to patients receiving high dose interleukin-2 (HD IL-2) immunotherapy. METHODS: Survival of 810 mRCC patients treated from 2006 to 2017 with high dose IL-2 (aldesleukin) and enrolled in the PROCLAIMSM registry data base was assessed utilizing the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk criteria. Median follow-up is 23.4 months (mo.) (range 0.2-124 mo.). Subgroup evaluations were performed by separating patients by prior or no prior therapy, IL-2 alone, or therapy subsequent to IL-2. Some patients were in two groups. We will focus on the 356 patients who received IL-2 alone, and evaluate outcome by risk factor categories. RESULTS: Among the 810 patients, 721 were treatment-naïve (89%) and 59% were intermediate risk. Overall, of the 249 patients with favorable risk, the median overall survival (OS) is 63.3 mo. and the 2-year OS is 77.6%. Of 480 patients with intermediate risk, median OS is 42.4 mo., 2-year OS 68.2%, and of 81 patients with poor risk, median OS 14 mo., 2-year OS 40.4%. Among those who received IL-2 alone (356 patients), median OS is 64.5, 57.6, and 14 months for favorable, intermediate and poor risk categories respectively. Two year survival among those treated only with HD IL-2 is 73.4, 63.7 and 39.8%, for favorable, intermediate and poor risk categories respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among mRCC patients treated with HD IL-2, all risk groups have median and 2-year survival consistent with recent reports of checkpoint or targeted therapies for mRCC. Favorable and intermediate risk (by IMDC) patients treated with HD IL-2 have longer OS compared with poor risk patients, with most durable OS observed in favorable risk patients. Favorable risk patients treated with HD IL-2 alone have a 2-year OS of 74%. These data continue to support a recommendation for HD IL-2 for patients with mRCC who meet eligibility criteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROCLAIM, NCT01415167 was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on August 11, 2011, and initiated for retrospective data collection until 2006, and prospective data collection ongoing since 2011.

Phase 2 trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid and/or poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Michaelson MD, McKay RR, Werner L, Atkins MB, Van Allen EM, Olivier KM, Song J, Signoretti S, McDermott DF, Choueiri TK.Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3435-43. [Epub 2015 Jun 8]. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29503.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with an aggressive biology and a poor prognosis. Poor-risk RCC is defined by clinical prognostic factors and demonstrates similarly aggressive behavior. No standard treatment exists for patients with sarcomatoid RCC, and treatment options for patients with poor-risk disease are of limited benefit. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in clinically aggressive RCC. METHODS: This was a phase 2, single-arm trial of sunitinib and gemcitabine in patients with sarcomatoid or poor-risk RCC. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included the time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker correlatives. RESULTS: Overall, 39 patients had sarcomatoid RCC, and 33 had poor-risk RCC. The ORR was 26% for patients with sarcomatoid RCC and 24% for patients with poor-risk RCC. The median TTP and OS for patients with sarcomatoid RCC were 5 and 10 months, respectively. For patients with poor-risk disease, the median TTP and OS were 5.5 and 15 months, respectively. Patients whose tumors had>10% sarcomatoid histology had a higher clinical benefit rate (ORR plus stable disease) than those with≤10% sarcomatoid histology (P = 0.04). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (n = 20), anemia (n = 10), and fatigue (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that antiangiogenic therapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy are an active and well-tolerated combination for patients with aggressive RCC. The combination may be more efficacious than either therapy alone and is currently under further investigation.

International cancer seminars: a focus on kidney cancer.

Recent years have seen important advances in our understanding of the etiology, biology and genetics of kidney cancer. To summarize important achievements and identify prominent research questions that remain, a workshop was organized by IARC and the US NCI. A series of 'difficult questions' were formulated, which should be given future priority in the areas of population, genomic and clinical research.

Safety and clinical activity of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors after programmed cell death 1 inhibitor treatment in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Emerging agents blocking the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway show activity in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy after PD-1 inhibition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mRCC treated with anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1) monotherapy or in combination (with VEGFR-TKI or ipilimumab) that subsequently received VEGFR-TKI were retrospectively reviewed. The efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by the type of prior PD-1 regimen. Safety by the type and PD-1 exposure was also evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included. Forty-nine patients received prior therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) alone and 21 had combination therapy of aPD-1 and VEGFR-TKI. Overall, ORR to VEGFR-TKI after PD-1 inhibition was 28% (19/68) and the median PFS was 6.4 months (mo) (4.3-9.5). ORR to VEGFR-TKI after aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI was lower than that in patients treated with VEGFR-TKI after CPI alone (ORR 10% versus 36%, P = 0.039). In the multivariable analysis, patients treated with prior CPI alone were more likely to achieve an objective response than those treated with aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI (OR = 5.38; 95% CI 1.12-26.0, P = 0.03). There was a trend toward numerically longer median PFS in the VEGFR-TKI after the CPI alone group, 8.4 mo (3.2-12.4) compared with 5.5 mo (2.9-8.3) for those who had VEGFR-TKI after aPD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI (P = 0.15). The most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia, hypertension, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of VEGFR-TKIs after PD-1 inhibition were demonstrated in this retrospective study. The response rate was lower and the median progression-free survival was shorter in those patients who received prior PD-1 in combination with VEGFR-TKI. PD-1 exposure does not seem to significantly influence the safety of subsequent VEGFR-TKI treatment.

PD-L1 expression in nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in nonclear-cell RCC (non-ccRCC) and its association with clinical outcomes are unknown. METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were obtained from 101 patients with non-ccRCC. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in both tumor cell membrane and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC). PD-L1 tumor positivity was defined as ≥5% tumor cell membrane staining. For PD-L1 expression in TIMC, a combined score based on the extent of infiltrate and percentage of positive cells was used. Baseline clinico-pathological characteristics and outcome data [time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS)] were correlated with PD-L1 staining. RESULTS: Among 101 patients, 11 (10.9%) were considered PD-L1+ in tumor cells: 2/36 (5.6%) of chromophobe RCC, 5/50 (10%) of papillary RCC, 3/10 (30%) of Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 1/5 (20%) of collecting duct carcinoma. PD-L1 positivity (PD-L1+) in tumor cells was significantly associated with higher stage (P = 0.01) and grade (P = 0.03), as well as shorter OS (P < 0.001). On the other hand, PD-L1 positivity by TIMC was observed in 57 (56.4%) patients: 13/36 (36.1%) of chromophobe RCC, 30/50 (60%) of papillary RCC, 9/10 (90%) of Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 5/5 (100%) of collecting duct carcinoma. A trend toward shorter OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ in TIMC (P = 0.08). PD-L1+ in both tumor cell membrane and TIMC cells were associated with shorter TTR (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: In non-ccRCC, patients with PD-L1+ tumors appear to have worse clinical outcomes, although only PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells is associated with higher tumor stage and grade.

A phase I study of cabozantinib (XL184) in patients with renal cell cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cabozantinib targets tyrosine kinases including the hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor 2, which are important drug targets in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-arm open-label phase I trial evaluated the safety and tolerability of cabozantinib in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. RESULTS: The study enrolled 25 RCC patients for whom standard therapy had failed. Patients received a median of two prior systemic agents, and most patients had previously received at least one VEGF pathway inhibiting therapy (22 patients [88%]). Common adverse events included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, proteinuria, appetite decreased, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and vomiting. Partial response was reported in seven patients (28%). Median progression-free survival was 12.9 months, and median overall survival was 15.0 months. CONCLUSION: Cabozantinib demonstrates preliminary anti-tumor activity and a safety profile similar to that seen with other multitargeted VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced RCC patients. Further evaluation of cabozantinib in RCC is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01100619.

Anti-VEGF therapy in mRCC: differences between Asian and non-Asian patients.

BACKGROUND: Several reports suggest that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may be more toxic in Asian vs non-Asian populations. Comparative efficacy of these agents with respect to ethnicity is not well characterised. METHODS: A multicentre, retrospective, cohort study using Asian and non-Asian centres which collected data on ethnicity, dose reductions and outcomes using the International mRCC Database Consortium. RESULTS: This study included 1024 (464 Asian, 560 non-Asian) patients with a 29.4 months median follow-up. The percentage of dose modifications/reductions between non-Asians and Asians was similar (55% vs 61% P=0.1197). When adjusted for risk groups, there was no difference in overall or progression-free survival between non-Asians and Asians. Patients with dose reductions due to toxicity had longer treatment durations and overall survival than those who did not in both non-Asian (10.6 vs 5.0 months, P<0.0001; 22.6 vs 16.1 months, P=0.0016, respectively) and Asian populations (8.9 vs 5.4 months, P=0.0028; 28.0 vs 18.7 months, P=0.0069, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for risk groups, there appears to be no difference in outcome between Asian vs non-Asian patients with mRCC treated with VEGF-targeted therapy. Judicious dose reductions may allow for better outcomes in both populations due to longer treatment durations, but direct comparisons are needed.

Sunitinib in combination with gemcitabine for advanced solid tumours: a phase I dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: This phase I, dose-finding study determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS: Two schedules with sunitinib (25-50 mg per day) and IV gemcitabine (750-1250 mg m(-2)) in escalating doses were studied. First, patients received sunitinib on a 4-weeks-on-2-weeks-off schedule (Schedule 4/2) plus gemcitabine on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. Second, patients received sunitinib on a 2-weeks-on-1-week-off schedule (Schedule 2/1) plus gemcitabine on days 1 and 8. The primary endpoint was determination of MTD and tolerability. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received the combination (Schedule 4/2, n=8; Schedule 2/1, n=36). With no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at maximum dose levels on Schedule 2/1, MTD was not reached. Grade 4 treatment-related AEs and laboratory abnormalities included cerebrovascular accident, hypertension, and pulmonary embolism (n=1 each), and neutropenia (n=3), thrombocytopenia and increased uric acid (both n=2), and lymphopenia (n=1). There were no clinically significant drug-drug interactions. Antitumor activity occurred across dose levels and tumour types. In poor-risk and/or high-grade renal cell carcinoma patients (n=12), 5 had partial responses and 7 stable disease ≥ 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib plus gemcitabine on Schedule 2/1 with growth factor support was well tolerated and safely administered at maximum doses of each drug, without significant drug-drug interactions.

A phase II pilot trial of concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interleukin 2, and interferon alpha-2B in patients with metastatic melanoma.

In an effort to develop a biochemotherapy regimen for metastatic melanoma suitable for testing in a cooperative group setting, we modified the concurrent biochemotherapy regimen of S. S. Legha et al. (J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 1752-1759, 1998) by providing enhanced supportive care and developing a strict, conservative approach to the management of treatment-related toxicities. Patients received cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (CVD: cisplatin (20 mg/m2) and vinblastine (1.2 mg/m2) on days 1-4, dacarbazine (800 mg/m2) on day 1 only) concurrently with interleukin 2 (9 MIU/m2/day) by continuous i.v. infusion on days 1-4 and IFN-alpha (5 MU/m2/day) on days 1-5, 8, 10, and 12. Prophylactic antibiotics and a maximum of four cycles were administered. Routine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and aggressive antiemetics were initiated after patients 7 and 14, respectively. Forty-four patients were enrolled in this study. No patients had received prior chemotherapy or interleukin 2; however, 23 (53%) had received prior IFN-alpha, mostly in the adjuvant setting. A total of 131 treatment cycles was administered. Significant toxicities requiring dose modification included: hypotension requiring pressors (15 episodes in 11 patients), grades 3/4 vomiting (12 episodes in 15 cycles; 5 episodes in 12 patients (6 episodes in 9 cycles after initiation of the modified antiemetic regimen), transient renal insufficiency (5 episodes in 5 patients), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (24 episodes, 1 associated with bleeding), neutropenia with or without fever (15 instances, only 11 in 112 cycles after routine use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), and catheter-related bacteremia (2 patients). Five (16%) of 30 patients who were treated after the last protocol modification experienced what we defined as unacceptable toxicity for a cooperative group setting. Responses were seen in 19 of 40 evaluable patients (relative risk, 48%) with 8 complete responses (20%). The median response duration was 7 months (range, 1-17+ months) with one currently ongoing. The central nervous system was the initial site of relapse in 11 responding patients. The median survival duration was 11 months (range, 2-31 months). This modified, concurrent biochemotherapy regimen is active and tolerable for use in a cooperative group setting. Central nervous system relapse, however, remains a concern for responders. This regimen is being compared with CVD in a Phase III Intergroup Trial (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/Southwest Oncology Group 3695).

Phase I trial of twice-weekly intravenous interleukin 12 in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer or malignant melanoma: ability to maintain IFN-gamma induction is associated with clinical response.

The aim of this study was to examine the tolerability, antitumor activity, and biological effects of a new schedule of i.v. recombinant human interleukin 12 (rhIL-12). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in a Phase I trial in which rhIL-12 was administered twice weekly as an i.v. bolus for 6 weeks. Stable or responding patients were eligible to receive additional 6-week cycles until there was no evidence of disease or until tumor progression. Patient cohorts were treated with escalating doses of rhIL-12 (30-700 ng/kg). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 500 ng/kg, with dose-limiting toxicities consisting of elevated hepatic transaminases and cytopenias. At the MTD (n = 14), there was one partial response occurring after 6 cycles of rhIL-12 in a patient with renal cell cancer. Two additional renal cell cancer patients treated at the MTD had prolonged disease stabilization, with one of these exhibiting tumor regression after 8 cycles of rhIL-12. IFN-gamma, IL-15, and IL-18 were induced in patients treated with rhIL-12. Whereas IFN-gamma and IL-15 induction were attenuated midway through the first cycle in patients with disease progression, those patients with tumor regression or prolonged disease stabilization were able to maintain IFN-gamma, IL-15, and IL-18 induction. The down-modulation of IFN-gamma induction during rhIL-12 treatment did not relate to IL-10 production or alterations in rhIL-12 bioavailability but was associated with an acquired defect in lymphocyte IFN-gamma production in response to IL-12, IL-2, or IL-15. This defect could be partially overcome in vitro through combined stimulation with IL-12 plus IL-2. These findings show that the chronic administration of twice-weekly i.v. rhIL-12 is well-tolerated, stimulates the production of IL-12 costimulatory cytokines and IFN-gamma, and can induce delayed tumor regression. Strategies aimed at maintaining IFN-gamma induction, such as the addition of IL-2, may further augment the response rate to this schedule of rhIL-12.

A two-part phase I trial of high-dose interleukin 2 in combination with soluble (Chinese hamster ovary) interleukin 1 receptor.

Our purpose was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity associated with soluble Chinese hamster ovary [s(CHO)] recombinant human interleukin (IL) 1 receptor (IL-1R; Immunex, Seattle, WA) administration in humans and to determine the effective biological dose and/or maximum tolerated dose of the s(CHO) IL-1R in combination with high-dose IL-2 as determined by reduction in IL-2 toxicity and modulation of its biological effects. Twenty-seven patients with metastatic cancer were treated with escalating doses of s(CHO) IL-1R at 1, 1, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 55 mg/m2 i.v. on days -6 (except cohort 2), 1, and 15 and IL-2 at doses of 300,000 IU/kg (cohort 1) and 600,000 IU/kg (cohorts 2-7) i.v. every 8 h on days 1-5 and 15-19. No toxicity directly attributable to s(CHO) IL-1R was observed. The median number of IL-2 doses was 23. Hypotension and neurotoxicity were the major dose-limiting toxicities for the IL-2/s(CHO) IL-1R combination. Of the 24 patients treated with full-dose IL-2, there were six responses, three complete and three partial (response rate, 25%). Three patients developed thyroid dysfunction, and all 3 responding melanoma patients exhibited vitiligo. The t1/2 of s(CHO) IL-1R alone was 24-30 h and was not significantly altered by coadministration with IL-2. Whole-blood functional assays indicated that sufficient s(CHO) IL-1R was present in the circulation at top dose levels to inhibit the in vitro effects of IL-1beta on IL-8 induction; however, no effect on IL-2-induced IL-8 induction, or on the IL-1beta- or IL-2-induced tumor necrosis factor production, was observed. Suppression of IL-2-mediated tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-6 induction in vivo during the first 24 h after IL-2 administration was observed, and the neutrophil chemotactic defect normally seen with IL-2 was not observed. IL-1R antagonist induction far exceeded that seen previously with IL-2 alone. No inhibition of either serum C-reactive protein induction or enhanced urinary nitrate excretion and no consistent effect on IL-2-related changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cell phenotype or endothelial adhesion molecule expression were seen. The coadministration of s(CHO) IL-1R produced no apparent reduction in IL-2 clinical toxicity manifested by either the ability to administer more IL-2 than anticipated or a reduction in the toxicity associated with a given amount of IL-2. Therefore, no effective biological dose could be identified for the s(CHO) IL-1R.

Nephrectomy before interleukin-2 therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains challenging and controversial. There is some evidence of improved response to interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy in patients who undergo nephrectomy before systemic treatment. However, recent reports have suggested that surgery prior to immunotherapy may not be an efficient strategy, since many patients will not be able to receive systemic treatment after nephrectomy. We describe our criteria for determining which patients are candidates for nephrectomy before immunotherapy and present our series of patients treated with this approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on our initial experience with IL-2 based immunotherapy we developed certain inclusion criteria for treatment with initial nephrectomy followed by systemic immunotherapy, including greater than 75% debulking of tumor burden possible, no central nervous system, bone or liver metastases, adequate pulmonary and cardiac function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In addition, patients in whom biopsies show other than predominantly clear cell type histology are excluded. From 1991 through 1996, 28 patients met these criteria and were treated with this approach. Patients were followed to determine the number receiving immunotherapy as well as overall response and survival rates. RESULTS: Radical nephrectomy was performed in all patients. One patient died of respiratory failure from disease progression 1 month after nephrectomy. Another patient had poor pulmonary function and, therefore, was treated with an alternative cytokine therapy. The remaining 26 patients (93%) received at least 1 course of IL-2. Median interval between nephrectomy and initiation of immunotherapy was 1.5 months (range 1 to 3). Overall response rate was 39% with 5 complete (18%) and 6 partial (21%) responses. Actuarial median survival of the entire group was 20.5 months (range 1 to 66) from the initiation of treatment. Currently 13 patients are alive, including 8 who are disease and/or progression-free. CONCLUSIONS: Using these strict criteria nephrectomy can be effectively performed before immunotherapy without compromising the likelihood that patients will receive systemic treatment. The activity of IL-2 in patients treated with this approach is encouraging and justifies its consideration in properly selected patients.

Multiple host defense defects in failure of C57BL/6 ep/ep (pale ear) mice to resolve visceral Leishmania donovani infection.

Euthymic C57BL/L ep/ep (pale ear [PE]) mice halt the visceral replication of intracellular Leishmania donovani but fail to properly resolve infection. A previous study identified an isolated defect in tissue granuloma formation in these mice; CD4+ and CD8+ cell number, gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) production, and macrophage antimicrobial activity in vitro were all intact. New in vivo results reported here suggest a considerably more complex immune defect, with evidence indicating (i) enhanced control over L. donovani after transfer of normal C57BL/6 spleen cells, (ii) a partially suppressive Th2 cell-associated response mediated by interleukin-4 (IL-4) but not reversed by CD4+ cell depletion, (iii) absent responses to endogenous Th1 cell lymphokines (IFN-gamma and IL-2) but preserved responsiveness to endogenous tumor necrosis factor alpha, (iv) absent responses to exogenous treatment with recognized antileishmanial cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-12, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) not corrected by transfer of C57BL/6 spleen cells, and (v) a deficient response to antimony chemotherapy. Defective hepatic granuloma formation was not corrected by transfer of C57BL/6 spleen cells or by anti-IL-4 administration. While treatment with IL-2 and GM-CSF modified the tissue reaction and induced selected effector cells to encase tissue macrophages, no antileishmanial activity resulted. Together, these observations suggest that the failure of PE mice to resolve visceral L. donovani infection likely represents expression of multiple suboptimal immune responses and/or partial defects, probably involving a combination of T-cell dysfunction, a Th2 cell response, and target cell (macrophage) hyporesponsiveness.

Th1 and Th2 cell-associated cytokines in experimental visceral leishmaniasis.

In experimental Leishmania donovani infection in BALB/c mice, initial susceptibility gives way to T-cell-dependent acquired resistance and eventual control over visceral infection. Since various cytokines appear to underlie the host response to Leishmania infection, we examined infected liver tissue for gene expression of cytokines associated with Th1 (gamma interferon [IFN-gamma] and interleukin-2 [IL-2]) and Th2 cells (IL-4 and IL-10). By Northern (RNA) blot analysis, only IFN-gamma mRNA expression was detected in livers of infected euthymic mice. To determine whether activation of Th1 cells develops selectively in this model, qualitative PCR analysis was used. These results indicated that mRNAs for IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 were all induced by L. donovani infection. The potentially negative Th2 cell-associated response did not appear to play a functional role, however, since resistance was acquired, anti-IL-4 monoclonal antibody treatment did not accelerate control over visceral infection, and serum immunoglobulin E levels remained low. As judged by PCR analysis, IL-4 and IL-10 mRNAs were also expressed under three other conditions without apparent effect: in naive euthymic mice treated with IL-2, which induces leishmanicidal activity; in rechallenged immune mice, which resist reinfection; and in nude mice, which fail to control L. donovani. These results suggest that, like other Leishmania species, L. donovani infection may trigger a potentially suppressive Th2 cell-associated cytokine response. However, in T-cell-intact mice able to control L. donovani, this response either is insufficient to influence outcome or more likely is overshadowed by the Th1 cell response.

Role and effect of IL-2 in experimental visceral leishmaniasis.

In experimental visceral leishmaniasis, acquired resistance is T cell-dependent, involves IFN-gamma-activated macrophages, and is expressed in the tissues by granuloma formation. Resistance also correlates with Ag-stimulated IL-2 secretion; therefore, Leishmania donovani-infected BALB/c mice were treated with anti-IL-2 mAb or rIL-2 to determine the host defense effect of IL-2. In control mice, intracellular hepatic infection peaked at 2 wk and then declined coincident with granuloma development. In contrast, liver parasite burdens in anti-IL-2-treated mice continued to increase until after 4 wk, at which time mature granuloma formation was inhibited. Treatment of mice with continuously administered IL-2 reduced liver burdens by > 50% and led to marked accumulation of granuloma mononuclear cells. The IL-2-responsive mechanism was T cell-dependent and required both L3T4+ and Lyt-2+ cells. IL-2 enhanced IFN-gamma mRNA expression in vivo and was required for IFN-gamma secretion in vitro, and anti-IFN-gamma mAb administration abolished the antimicrobial effect of exogenous IL-2. These results: 1) identify the activity of endogenous IL-2 in both antileishmanial resistance and granuloma formation; 2) demonstrate that exogenous IL-2 can enhance the granulomatous tissue reaction; and 3) indicate that IL-2 treatment stimulates intracellular antimicrobial activity largely via the induction of IFN-gamma.

The effect of surgical debulking on the response of patients with ovarian carcinoma to chemotherapy.

The role of debulking surgery as an adjuvant to chemotherapy in advanced ovarian carcinoma was examined. Debulking surgery did not alter the overall response rate to chemotherapy. Surgical resection, though, was associated with an increased percentage of complete pathological remissions, particularly in patients receiving efficacious chemotherapy. Whether debulking surgery is causal or a prognostic factor remains conjectural.

Inadequacy of predicted creatinine clearance as guide to chemotherapy.

Many chemotherapeutic agents are nephrotoxic and/or excreted via the kidney. Thus, careful evaluation of renal function is important since drug dosages are often lowered in patients with impaired renal function. When the creatinine clearance as calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault from the patient's age, weight, and serum creatinine was compared to the measured creatinine clearance in the same patients, the correlation coefficient was low (r = 0.40) and the average difference between the predicted and measured creatinine clearance values was 25.3%. Thus, in our patient population, creatinine clearance calculated by the method of Cockcroft and Gault did not correlate well with measured creatinine clearance and thus was not useful as a clinical tool.