Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 12(12): 995-1004, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16252135

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal. Previous attempts with neoadjuvant therapy in this disease have been inconclusive, but a potential for benefit exists. We conducted a phase II trial of dose-intense docetaxel and gemcitabine followed by twice-weekly gemcitabine and external beam radiotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with stage I to III disease were eligible. Docetaxel 65 mg/m(2) intravenously over 1 hour and gemcitabine 4000 mg/m(2) given intravenously over 30 minutes were given on days 1, 15, and 29. On day 43, radiotherapy was begun at 50.4 Gy with gemcitabine 50 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes twice weekly for 12 doses. After treatment, patients were considered for resection. RESULTS: Twenty-four assessable patients were recruited onto the trial. All but one patient completed a full 12 weeks of therapy. Grade 3 and 4 hematological and nonhematological toxicities were common but manageable, and neutropenic fever did not occur. No patient had local tumor progression. Twelve patients (50%) responded by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Group (RECIST) criteria, including one radiographic complete response. Seventeen patients underwent resection after therapy. Margin-negative resections were performed in 13 patients, including 9 patients whose disease was borderline or unresectable before treatment. A treatment effect was seen in all resection specimens. There have been no local recurrences of tumor, and several patients remain alive without evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel/gemcitabine followed by gemcitabine/radiotherapy is active in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with manageable toxicity. Tumor downstaging occurs in some patients to allow complete resection. Further investigation of this regimen is warranted.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Docetaxel , Humans , Middle Aged , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Gemcitabine
2.
J Neurooncol ; 71(3): 301-5, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15735921

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Therapy for high-grade gliomas remains unsatisfactory. Paclitaxel and topotecan have separately demonstrated activity against gliomas. We conducted a Phase II trial of these agents in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) in patients with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma multiforme or anaplastic astrocytoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with radiographic evidence of recurrent or progressive tumor following primary therapy were eligible for study. Patients received paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1 and topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on days 1-5. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg was given days 6-14 for neutrophil support. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled on study, and seventeen were considered evaluable for response. Two patients (12/%) exhibited partial remission and seven patients (41/%) exhibited stable disease in response to therapy. Hematologic toxicity was common with 25 /% of patients experiencing grade III or IV leukopenia despite G-CSF support. Two patients died of infectious complications on protocol, prompting suspension of further accrual. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel and topotecan with G-CSF support exhibits modest activity in adults with recurrent or refractory glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. The significant hematotoxicity encountered, however, cannot justify further investigation of this combination in patients with high grade brain tumors.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Astrocytoma/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anemia/chemically induced , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Astrocytoma/mortality , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Female , Filgrastim , Glioblastoma/mortality , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Humans , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Topotecan/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...