Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Acad Med ; 79(10 Suppl): S43-5, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15383386

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the validity of the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) examination by addressing the degree to which experts view item content as clinically relevant and appropriate for Step 2 CK. METHOD: Twenty-seven experts were asked to complete three survey questions related to the clinical relevance and appropriateness of 150 Step 2 CK multiple-choice questions. Percentages, reliability estimates, and correlation coefficients were calculated and ordinary least squares regression was used. RESULTS: Results showed that 92% of expert judgments indicated the item content was clinically relevant, 90% indicated the content was appropriate for Step 2 CK, and 85% indicated the content was used in clinical practice. The regression indicated that more difficult items and more frequently used items are considered more appropriate for Step 2 CK. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the majority of item content is clinically relevant and appropriate, thus providing validation support for Step 2 CK.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical , Educational Measurement/standards , Licensure, Medical , Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Medical/standards , Educational Measurement/methods , Expert Testimony , Female , Humans , Judgment , Male , Reproducibility of Results , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...