Nutritional Assessment in Patients after Gastric Electrical Stimulation (GES).

BACKGROUND: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is used for patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis (Gp) symptoms. Approximately two-thirds of patients with Gp symptoms are either overweight or obese. We aimed to assess symptoms and nutritional status pre-GES and post-GES placement in a large sample of drug-refractory Gp patients. METHODS: We conducted a chart review of 282 patients with drug-refractory Gp who received temporary followed by permanent GES at an academic medical center. Gastrointestinal symptoms were collected by a traditional standardized PRO (0-4, 0 being asymptomatic and 4 being worst symptoms), baseline nutritional status by BMI plus subjective global assessment (SGA score A, B, C, for mild, moderate, and severe nutritional deficits), ability to tolerate diet, enteral tube access, and parenteral therapy were assessed at baseline and after permanent GES placement. RESULTS: Comparing baseline with permanent, GES was found to significantly improve upper GI symptoms in all quartiles. Of the 282 patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) information, 112 (40%) patients were severely malnourished at baseline, of which 36 (32%) patients' nutritional status improved after GES. Among all patients, 76 (68%) patients' nutritional status remained unchanged. Many patients with high BMI were malnourished by SGA. CONCLUSION: We conclude that symptomatic patients of different BMIs showed improvement in their GI symptoms irrespective of baseline nutritional status. Severely malnourished patients were found to have an improvement in their nutritional status after GES therapy. We conclude that BMI, even if high, is not by itself a contraindication for GES therapy for symptomatic patients.

Baseline Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Response in Drug and Device Refractory Gastroparesis Symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been shown in a small pilot series to be helpful for some patients with gastroparesis that is refractory to drugs, devices, and surgical therapies. Many but not all patients have serologic neuromuscular markers. We hypothesize that those patients with serologic markers and/or longer duration of therapy would have better responses to IVIG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 47 patients with a diagnosis of gastroparesis and gastroparesis-like syndrome that had all failed previous therapies including available and investigational drugs, devices, and/or pyloric therapies. Patients had a standardized 12-week course of IVIG, dosed as 400 mg/kg per week intravenously. Symptom assessment was done with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) compliant traditional patient-reported outcomes. Success to IVIG was defined as 20% or greater reduction in average symptom scores from baseline to the latest evaluation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (30%) had a response, and 33 (70%) had no response per our definition. Patients responding had a higher glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 positivity (64% vs. 30%, P =0.049, missing=3) and longer duration of therapy (>12 wk/continuous: 86% vs. 48%, P =0.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this moderately sized open-label series of refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms treated with IVIG, 30% of patients responded. While serologic markers and extended therapies show a trend to greater response, neither was statistically significant, except for glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 which showed a higher positivity rate in responders. We conclude that a clinical trial of IVIG may be warranted in severely refractory patients with gastroparesis symptoms.

Low-Resolution Electrogastrogram at Baseline and Response to Temporary Gastric Electrical Stimulation-A Comparison of Cutaneous With Mucosal Recordings.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a widely accepted therapy for gastroparesis symptoms, but how a brief cutaneous electrogastrogram (EGG) can be used in conjunction with GES has not been well defined. We evaluated the clinical importance of EGG, its correlation with mucosal electrograms (mEGs), gastric emptying tests (GETs), and gastrointestinal symptoms before and after temporary GES (tGES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1345 patients; 991 had complete data. EGG measurements like frequency and amplitude were recorded at baseline and five days post-tGES using short recording periods. A total of 266 participants having additional cutaneous propagation values were separately analyzed. Patients underwent solid GET before and after tGES and self-reported symptoms using standardized traditional patient-reported outcomes (TradPRO) scores. Pearson correlations were assessed at baseline, post-stimulation, and their changes over the follow-up period. RESULTS: EGG measures correlated with symptoms and GET results. Patients with abnormal baseline cutaneous frequency had higher baseline total symptom scores (p < 0.003). Post-tGES, one-hour gastric emptying was significantly changed (p < 0.0001) and was mainly observed with abnormal baseline cutaneous frequencies (p < 0.0001). Cutaneous frequency significantly increased after tGES (p < 0.0001), correlating positively with TradPRO scores and one-hour gastric emptying. Mucosal and cutaneous measures correlated pre- and post-treatment. Of the 266 patients, 153 changed propagation states between baseline and temporary; changing states from lower at baseline to higher at temporary was more likely than vice versa. Short EGG recording times can demonstrate changes after the bioelectric therapy of GES. CONCLUSION: EGG is valuable in the diagnosis of delayed gastric emptying and comparable with mEG. It is less invasive and can identify patients who may require GES. Frequency, amplitude, their ratio (frequency-amplitude ratio), and propagation appear to be reliable measures of EGG. EGG provides cost-effective measurement of electrophysiological properties and significantly correlates with important clinical measures. Shorter EGG recording times may be adequate to see changes from bioelectric therapies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT03876288.

Baseline predictive factors for foregut and hindgut response to long-term gastric electrical stimulation using augmented energy.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been recommended for drug refractory patients with gastroparesis, but no clear baseline predictors of symptom response exist. We hypothesized that long-term predictors to GES for foregut and hindgut symptoms exist, particularly when using augmented energies. PATIENTS: We evaluated 307 patients at baseline, 1 week post temporary GES, and one year after permanent GES. Baseline measures included upper and lower symptoms by patient-reported outcomes (PRO), solid and liquid gastric emptying (GET), cutaneous, mucosal, and serosal electrophysiology (EGG, m/s EG), BMI, and response to temporary stimulation. METHODS: Foregut and hindgut PRO symptoms were analyzed for 12-month patient outcomes. All patients utilized a standardized energy algorithm with the majority of patients receiving medium energy at 12 months. Patients were categorized based on change in average GI symptom scores at the time of permanent GES compared to baseline using a 10% decrease over time as the cutoff between improvers versus non-improvers. RESULTS: By permanent GES implant, average foregut and hindgut GI symptom scores reduced 42% in improved patients (n = 199) and increased 27% in non-improved patients (n = 108). Low BMI, baseline infrequent urination score, mucosal EG ratio, and proximal mucosal EG low-resolution amplitude remained significant factors for improvement status. CONCLUSIONS: GES, for patients responding positively, improved both upper/foregut and lower/hindgut symptoms with most patients utilizing higher than nominal energies. Low baseline BMI and the presence of infrequent urination along with baseline gastric electrophysiology may help identify those patients with the best response to GES/bio-electric neuromodulation.

Pathophysiology of Gastroparesis Syndromes Includes Anatomic and Physiologic Abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Factors underlying gastroparesis are not well defined. AIMS: We hypothesized that multiple systems may be involved in patients with gastroparesis symptoms and performed a comparative physiologic study. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive eligible patients with gastroparetic symptoms categorized by GI symptoms, metabolic status, illness quantification, and gastric physiology. Patients were evaluated by two methods in each of five core areas: inflammatory, autonomic, enteric, electrophysiologic, and hormonal with abnormalities examined by correlations. RESULTS: Patients had similar GI symptoms regardless of baseline gastric emptying or diabetic/idiopathic status, and all patients demonstrated abnormalities in each of the 5 areas studied. Nearly all patients presented with elevated markers of serum TNFα (88%) and serum IL-6 (91%); elevated cutaneous electrogastrogram frequency (95%); and interstitial cells of Cajal count abnormalities (inner: 97%, outer: 100%). Measures of inflammation correlated with a number of autonomic, enteric anatomy, electrophysiologic and hormonal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients with the symptoms of gastroparesis have multiple abnormalities, when studied by traditional, as well as newer, diagnostic assessments. Inflammation appears to be a fundamental abnormality that affects other organ systems in symptomatic patients. Future work on gastroparetic syndromes and their treatment may benefit from a focus on the diffuse nature of their illness, diverse pathophysiologic mechanisms involved, especially the possible causes of underlying inflammation and disordered hormonal status. TRAIL REGISTRY: This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under study # NCT03178370 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03178370 .

Gastric Electrical Stimulation Has an Effect on Gastric Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) That is Associated With Mast Cells.

Introduction Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is an emerging therapy for gastric motility disorders, showing improvement of gastroparesis related symptoms in previous studies. Interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) and mast cells have been shown to have a relevant role in gastroparesis pathogenesis. However, the exact effects of GES in those cells is relatively unknown. Methods Full thickness biopsies (FTBx) of 20 patients with refractory gastroparesis were obtained at the time of GES placement and repeated when the device was exchanged (mean of 22.5 months between biopsies). A patient-reported outcomes survey was obtained during each office visit during this period. All biopsies were stained with cluster of differentiation 117 (CD117), S100, and mast cell tryptase antibodies and were analyzed. Results Half of the patients had a significant increase of ICC during the repeated biopsy compared with baseline (p=0.01) and the other half had significant decrease in ICC levels (p=0.006) but there was no noticeable difference in mast cells counts at baseline between groups. Mast cells analysis was performed in two different groups depending on ICC change from the baseline biopsy (CD117 increase vs CD117 decrease). There was only a significant increase of mast cells count within the CD117 worsened ICC group (p=0.007). Conclusion No significant increase in the number of mast cells count seen in patients who received a GES may indicate an improvement in overall inflammation in patients with refractory gastroparesis after GES placement.

Multi-day, multi-sensor ambulatory monitoring of gastric electrical activity.

OBJECTIVE: Bioelectrial signals known as slow waves play a key role in coordinating gastric motility. Slow wave dysrhythmias have been associated with a number of functional motility disorders. However, there have been limited human recordings obtained in the consious state or over an extended period of time. This study aimed to evaluate a robust ambulatory recording platform. APPROACH: A commercially available multi-sensor recording system (Shimmer3, ShimmerSensing) was applied to acquire slow wave information from the stomach of six humans and four pigs. First, acute experiments were conducted in pigs to verify the accuracy of the recording module by comparing to a standard widely employed electrophysiological mapping system (ActiveTwo, BioSemi). Then, patients with medically refractory gastroparesis undergoing temporary gastric stimulator implantation were enrolled and gastric slow waves were recorded from mucosally-implanted electrodes for 5 d continuously. Accelerometer data was also collected to exclude data segments containing excessive patient motion artefact. MAIN RESULTS: Slow wave signals and activation times from the Shimmer3 module were closely comparable to a standard electrophysiological mapping system. Slow waves were able to be recorded continuously for 5 d in human subjects. Over the 5 d, slow wave frequency was 2.8 ± 0.6 cpm and amplitude was 0.2 ± 0.3 mV. SIGNIFICANCE: A commercial multi-sensor recording module was validated for recording electrophysiological slow waves for 5 d, including in ambulatory patients. Multiple modules could be used simultaneously in the future to track the spatio-temporal propagation of slow waves. This framework can now allow for patho-electrophysiological studies to be undertaken to allow symptom correlation with dysrhythmic slow wave events.

Gastroparesis syndromes: Response to electrical stimulation.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Factors underlying gastroparesis are not well defined, nor is the mechanism of action of gastric electrical stimulation (GES). We hypothesized that GES acts via several mechanisms related to underlying disordered pathophysiology. METHODS: We studied 43 consecutive eligible patients with gastroparetic symptoms, previously evaluated by two methods in each of five core areas: inflammatory, autonomic, enteric, electrophysiologic, and hormonal; and also categorized by GI symptoms, metabolic status, illness quantification, and gastric physiology. We then studied 41 patients who underwent temporary GES for 5-7 days. Thirty-six of those patients were implanted and 30 were followed up at 6 months after permanent GES. RESULTS: In previous but separately reported work, patients had similar GI symptoms regardless of baseline gastric emptying or diabetic/idiopathic status and all patients demonstrated abnormalities in each of the five areas studied. After GES, patients showed early and late effects of electrical stimulation with changes noted in multiple areas, categorized by improvement status. CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis have multiple abnormalities, including systemic inflammation and disordered hormonal status. GES affects many of these abnormalities. We conclude electrical stimulation improves symptoms and physiology with (a) an early and sustained anti-emetic effect; (b) an early and durable gastric prokinetic effect in delayed emptying patients; (c) an early anti-arrhythmic effect that continues over time; (d) a late autonomic effect; (e) a late hormonal effect; (f) an early anti-inflammatory effect that persists; and (g) an early and sustained improvement in health-related quality of life. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under study # NCT03178370 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03178370).

The Effect of Gastric Electrical Stimulation on Small Bowel Motility in Patients With Gastroparesis and Concomitant Pancreatic and Small Bowel Dysfunction: From Animal Model to Human Application.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients with gastroparesis often have biliary/pancreatic and small bowel symptoms but the effects of gastric electrical stimulation on small bowel electrical activity of the mid-gut have not been studied. Animal model aim: Establish gastric and upper small bowel/biliary slow wave activity relationships with electrical stimulation. Human study aim: Demonstrate improvement in symptoms associated with proximal small bowel dysmotility in gastric stimulated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Animal model: In vivo evoked responses of duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi measures recorded during gastric electrical stimulation in a nonsurvival swine model (N = 3). High-resolution electrical slow wave mapping of frequency, amplitude, and their ratio, for duodenal and Sphincter of Oddi electrical activity were recorded. Human study: Patients (N = 8) underwent temporary gastric stimulation with small bowel electrodes. Subjective and objective data was collected before and after temporary gastric stimulation. Symptom scores, gastric emptying times, and mucosal electrograms via low-resolution mapping were recorded. RESULTS: Animal gastric stimulation resulted in some changes in electrical activity parameters, especially with the highest energies delivered but the changes were not statistically significant. Human study revealed improvement in symptom and illness severity scores, and changes in small bowel mucosal slow wave activity. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric electrical stimulation in an animal model seems to show nonsignificant effects small bowel slow wave activity and myoelectric signaling, suggesting the existence of intrinsic neural connections. Human data shows more significance, with possible potential for therapeutic use of electrical stimulation in patients with gastroparesis and pancreato-biliary and small bowel symptoms of the mid-gut. This study was limited by the nonsurvival pig model, small sample size, and open label human study.

Clinical Efficacy of Serum-Derived Bovine Immunoglobulin in Patients With Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can have autoimmunity and/or intestinal barrier dysfunction as part of pathophysiology and may be refractory to all available treatment options. Serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin (SBI) binds microbial components with postulated downstream effects of normalized gut immune and barrier function, which may be useful for managing IBD. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SBI in the management of refractory IBD, particularly symptoms of chronic diarrhea and loose stools. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed charts for patients diagnosed with IBD (n = 40) who were refractory to standard treatment. Patients received oral SBI 5 g daily for a period of at least 6 weeks. Twelve patients with IBD fulfilled study inclusion criteria. Each patient graded the severity and frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms before starting SBI and at 6 weeks of treatment using a standardized patient assessment form. Means and standard deviations for all symptom scores at baseline and week 6 of treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean symptom scores decreased significantly for nausea (P = 0.02 for severity and P = 0.03 for mean symptom score) and diarrhea (P = 0.0006, P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0001 for severity, frequency and mean symptom score, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with SBI alleviated some refractory gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBD, including nausea and diarrhea. Increased duration, dosage and/or frequency of SBI might provide additional symptom improvement and could be tested through controlled clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up.

Ambulatory gastric mucosal slow wave recording for chronic experimental studies.

Dysrhythmic bioelectric slow wave activity have been implicated in major functional motility disorders such as gastroparesis and chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting, but its correlation to symptoms is still unclear. For patients with severe gastroparesis, high-frequency gastric stimulation is offered as a therapy in some centers. Temporary gastric electrical stimulation has also been proposed an approach to screen patients who would benefit from the implantation of a permanent stimulator. In this study we introduced novel methods for recording slow wave activity from the gastric mucosa during the entire temporary stimulation phase of 5 days, in 3 patients. An ambulatory recording system was applied to record 3 channels of mucosal slow wave activity, as well as three axis accelerometer data to monitor when the patient was mobile. Techniques were developed to detect large movements and these time periods were excluded from analyses of mucosal slow waves. The frequency and amplitude of the slow waves was calculated in a 5 min segment, with 75% overlap, for the entire duration. In feasibility studies, the slow wave frequency and amplitude for the patients were 3.0±0.96 cpm and 1.43±1.75 mV. Large variations in slow wave amplitude were seen in comparsion to slow wave frequency, which were concordant with previous studies. The use of the ambulatory system will allow for investigation of pathophysiology, correlation of electrophysiology data to patient symptoms and to determine the effects of post-prandial and noctural slow wave patterns. We anticipate that future use of slow wave information alongside patient symptoms may allow improved selection of patients for stimulaton techniques.

Treating an oft-unrecognized and troublesome entity: using gastric electrical stimulation to reduce symptoms of malignancy-associated gastroparesis.

PURPOSE: Malignancy-associated gastroparesis (MAG) is a cause of morbidity in cancer patients but therapies are lacking. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a novel treatment for MAG. Here, we describe 19 patients with MAG who underwent temporary GES placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients (6 males, 13 females) with various malignancies were reviewed for symptom scores and physiologic measures at baseline and after temporary GES placement. Symptoms were scored by three variables: nausea (N), vomiting (V), and GI total symptom score (TSS). Physiologic profiles were measured by solid and liquid phase gastric emptying scans (GET) at 1, 2, and 4 h and cutaneous electrogastrogram (EGG) and mucosal electrogram (EG) frequencies. Symptoms were measured for 5 days after temporary endoscopic GES placement, and measures were repeated post GES placement. RESULTS: Baseline GET results displayed delayed gastric emptying in 16 of 19 patients (mean solid retention 21.7 % at 4 h, normal <10 %; mean liquid retention 10.4 % at 4 h, normal <5 %). Cutaneous EGG (mean frequency 5.5 cpm) and EG (mean proximal frequency 5.1 cpm; mean distal frequency 5.1 cpm) showed evidence of neuromuscular dysfunction (normal 2.5-3.3 cpm). Symptom scores in N, V, and TSS showed statistically significant reduction after GES placement. CONCLUSION: A small sample of patients with MAG and receiving temporary GES experienced symptom improvement, with less change on gastric emptying time or gastric electrical amplitude or frequency. GES may provide a potential therapeutic option for symptomatic management of MAG and evaluation of these MAG patients after permanent GES placement is ongoing. Prospective studies of MAG using temporary and permanent GES may be warranted.

Mini-laparotomy with Adjunctive Care versus Laparoscopy for Placement of Gastric Electrical Stimulation.

We compared outcomes for two gastric electrical stimulation placement strategies, minilaparotomy with adjunctive care (MLAC) versus laparoscopy without adjunctive care (LAPA). For electrode placement, the peritoneal cavity was accessed with either a single 2.5 to 3.0 cm midline incision (MLAC) or three trocar incisions (LAPA). For both groups, generator was placed subcutaneously over the anterior rectus sheath. For MLAC, adjunctive pain control measures were used for placement of both electrode and generator (transversus abdominus plane block). For LAPA, those that could not be completed by laparoscopy were converted to traditional open approach and kept in the analysis. MLAC (n = 128) resulted in shorter operative times than LAPA (n = 37) (median operative time: 87.5 vs 137.0 minutes, P ≤ 0.01). Hospital length of stay was also shorter for MLAC than for LAPA (median: 2.0 vs 3.0 days, P ≤ 0.01) without any increase in readmission rates to the hospital within 30 days of discharge (11.0 vs 16.2%, P = 0.39). After equalizing learning curves, these differences were even greater (median operative time: 84.5 vs 137.0 minutes, P < 0.01; median length of stay: 1.0 vs 3.0 days; P < 0.01) without increasing 30-day readmission rates (9.1 vs 16.2%, P = 0.25). For implantation of gastric electrical stimulators, minilaparotomy can result in improved outcomes when coupled with adjunctive pain control measures.