Hand-Specific External Fixation for Treatment of Complex Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries.

Background: Complex proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fractures are challenging injuries to treat. There are multiple established treatment methods available for these injuries, including dynamic external fixation. This study reports the outcomes of complex PIPJ fractures treated with a hand-specific external fixation device. Methods: Twenty-five fingers in 25 patients were treated with the DigiFix external fixator device for treatment of a PIPJ dorsal fracture dislocation (n = 16) or pilon fracture (n = 9). There were 16 males and 9 females with a mean age of 40 years (range: 14-75 years) at the time of injury. The median time from injury to surgery was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 5; range: 3-49). Chart and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively. Results: The average duration of external fixation was 41 days (range: 26-62 days). At a mean follow-up of 28 weeks (range: 12-105 weeks), the mean PIPJ flexion was 82 (range: 30-105 degrees), extension was -10° (range: -30 to 0 degrees), and flexion/extension arc of motion was 72 degrees (range: 30-95 degrees). Final mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score was 21.5 (range: 0-65.8). There were zero major complications and six (24%) minor complications, including superficial cellulitis (4) and stiffness (2). Conclusion: Dynamic external fixation for the treatment of complex PIPJ injuries allows for early range of motion and leads to favorable outcomes. This hand-specific external fixator has a reproducible technique which results in predictable and reliable PIPJ distraction.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Clean Hand Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Analysis of Major and Minor Complications.

Purpose: The indications for prophylactic antibiotics in hand surgery remain undefined. Current literature has focused solely on readmission and reoperation for surgical site infection, while neglecting minor infectious complications treated at outpatient follow-up in addition to complications from antibiotic therapy observed after surgery. This study sought to analyze major and minor infection rates, as well as adverse effects of preoperative antibiotics after clean hand surgery. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted over a 6-month period. The cohorts included patients who received preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and those that did not. Patient details and operative data were obtained during the first postoperative visit following the index surgery. Primary outcomes assessed were as follows: (1) major infection, defined as admission or reoperation for infection; (2) minor infection, defined as use of postoperative oral antibiotics; and (3) complications of antibiotic therapy. Results: A total of 377 consecutive patients underwent operations of the upper extremity. Complications from preoperative antibiotic therapy were seen in 6.9% of patients. Overall, there were no major postoperative infections and the minor postoperative infection rate was 5.6%. The minor infection rate was 6.9% (9/131) among patients who did not receive preoperative antibiotics and 4.9% (12/246) among patients who received preoperative antibiotics (P = .57). Conclusions: A 5.6% minor infection rate was identified following clean hand surgery, with no cases of major infection. Preoperative antibiotics did not demonstrate benefit in terms of reduction of minor infections, but they did yield a 6.9% adverse reaction rate, including one case of Clostridium difficile infection warranting hospitalization. Caution is recommended while prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for clean hand surgeries, given the lack of clear benefits and the potential for adverse effects. Type of Study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Women Older than 80 Years: A Preliminary Report of Functional and Radiographic Outcomes after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.

Background Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures seen in the elderly. The management of distal radius fractures in the elderly, especially patients older than 80 years, has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative treatment of distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years to determine functional outcomes and complication rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review was performed to identify patients 80 years or older who were treated for a distal radius fracture with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, functional outcomes including quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH), radiographs, and postoperative complications. Results There were 40 patients included for review. Average age was 84 years. The preoperative qDASH score was 69. At 6 months follow-up, the postoperative qDASH score was 13 ( p < 0.001). There were five (12.5%) complications reported postoperatively. All fractures healed with adequate radiographic alignment and there were no hardware failures. Conclusion Distal radius fractures in patients older than 80 years treated with ORIF have good functional outcomes and low complication rates. Increased functionality and independence of the elderly, as well as updated implant design can lead to the effective surgical management of these patients. When indicated from a clinical perspective, operative fixation of distal radius fractures should be considered in patients older than 80 years.

Anterior Interosseous Nerve to Ulnar Nerve Transfers: A Systematic Review.

Background There has been an increasing utilization of end-to-end (ETE) and reverse "supercharged" end-to-side (SETS) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve transfers (NTs) for treatment of high ulnar nerve injury. This study aimed to review the potential indications for, and outcomes of, ETE and SETS AIN-ulnar NT. Methods A literature review was performed, and 10 articles with 156 patients who had sufficient follow-up to evaluate functional outcomes were included. English studies were included if they reported the outcome of patients with ulnar nerve injuries treated with AIN to ulnar motor NT. Outcomes were analyzed based on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire scores, grip and key pinch strength, and interosseous Medical Research Council-graded motor strength. Comparisons were made using the independent t -test and the chi-square test. No nerve graft control group was required for eligibility. Ulnar nerve injury types varied. Results NT resulted in 77% of patients achieving M3+ recovery, 53.7 ± 19.8 lb grip strength recovery, 61 ± 21% key pinch recovery, and a mean DASH score of 33.4 ± 16. In this diverse group, NT resulted in significantly greater M3+ recovery and grip strength recovery measured in pounds than in the nerve graft/conventional treatment group, and ETE repairs had significantly better outcomes compared with SETS repairs for grip strength, key pinch strength, and DASH scores, but heterogeneity limits interpretation. Conclusion ETE and SETS AIN-ulnar NTs produce significant restoration of ulnar nerve motor function for high ulnar nerve injuries. For ulnar nerve transection injuries at or above the elbow, ETE NT results in superior motor recovery compared with nerve grafting/conventional repair. However, further research is needed to determine the best treatment for other types of ulnar nerve injury and the role of SETS NT.

Wound Dehiscence Following Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

PURPOSE: Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common upper-extremity compressive neuropathy, and persistent symptoms can necessitate operative treatment. Surgical options include simple decompression and ulnar nerve transposition. The cause of wound dehiscence after surgery is not well known, and the factors leading to the development of these complications have not been previously described. METHODS: Patients undergoing ulnar nerve surgery from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were retrospectively evaluated for the development of wound dehiscence within 3 months of surgery. There were 295 patients identified who underwent transposition and 1,106 patients who underwent simple decompression. Patient demographics and past medical history were collected to evaluate the risk factors for the development of wound dehiscence. RESULTS: The overall rate of wound dehiscence following surgery was 2.5%. In the simple decompression group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 2.7% (30/1,106), which occurred a mean of 21 days (range, 2-57 days) following surgery. In the transposition group, the rate of wound dehiscence was 1.7% (5/295), which occurred a mean of 20 days (range, 12-32 days) following surgery. The difference in rates of dehiscence between the decompression and transposition groups was not significant. Five patients in the simple decompression group and 1 patient in the transposition group required a secondary surgery for closure of the wound. Age, body mass index, smoking status, and medical comorbidities were not found to contribute to the development of wound dehiscence. CONCLUSIONS: Wound dehiscence can occur following both simple decompression and transposition, even after postoperative evaluation demonstrates a healed wound. Surgeons should be aware of this possibility and specifically counsel patients about remaining cautious with, and protective of, their wound for several weeks after surgery. Dehiscence may be related to suboptimal vascularity in the soft tissue envelope in the posteromedial elbow. When it occurs, dehiscence can generally be treated by allowing healing by secondary intention. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Risk Factors and Outcomes in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Following Distal Radius Open Reduction Internal Fixation.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common complication following the operative repair of distal radius fractures. It is unclear who is at risk of developing this complication in the postoperative period. This study sought to identify risk factors for developing CTS and to evaluate patient-reported outcomes in patients who develop postoperative CTS. METHODS: A retrospective review of all distal radius fractures treated surgically at a single private academic center was performed from January 2007 to October 2019. Of the 4,487 patients, 68 were identified to have an ipsilateral carpal tunnel release within 6 months of the distal radius injury. Collected data comprised patient demographics, medical history, and functional outcome scores. RESULTS: Carpal tunnel syndrome was more likely to develop in older patients (62.9 years vs 57.4 years). Sex, body mass index, smoking history, and the type of insurance were not found to be significantly different between the groups. Medical history of kidney disease, psychiatric conditions, and peripheral vascular disease were found to be associated with developing CTS. Patients who developed CTS had higher average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores than patients without CTS (28.1 vs 20.0) at the final follow-up. In a multivariable analysis, patients who developed CTS were found to be older (Odds ratio, 1.03) and less likely to be smokers (Odds ratio, 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, we observed that older patients were more likely to require carpal tunnel release following distal radius fracture. In addition, nonsmokers were more likely to require subsequent carpal tunnel release, probably as a result of confounding effects. Special care should be taken to monitor these patients for CTS in the postoperative period following a distal radius open reduction and internal fixation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Does Surgery Improve Healing After Isolated Diaphyseal Ulna Fractures?

PURPOSE: Isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures can be treated nonsurgically or with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). It is unclear whether ORIF provides quicker and/or more predictable healing. The purpose of this study was to compare the healing characteristics of isolated diaphyseal ulna fractures after surgical and nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: All patients treated for an isolated diaphyseal (distal- or middle-third) ulna fracture between 2010 and 2018, with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up, were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record patient demographics, assess the treatments used, and compare outcomes. We determined healing and nonunion rates, complications, reoperations, and final radiographic fracture alignment. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were included with a median follow-up of 20 weeks. Of these, 56 patients were treated nonsurgically and 39 patients were treated with ORIF. At the time of the final follow-up, 51 of the 56 (91.1%) nonsurgically treated fractures had healed and 38 of the 39 (97.4%) surgically managed fractures had healed. There were 5 nonunions after nonsurgical treatment (8.9%) and 1 nonunion after ORIF (2.6%). Eleven patients (19.6%) treated nonsurgically required conversion to ORIF, whereas 4 patients (10.3%) treated with ORIF required reoperation. Middle-third fractures treated nonsurgically had a higher rate of nonunion (30.8%) compared with distal-third fractures treated nonsurgically (2.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The healing characteristics of isolated ulnar shaft fractures do not appear to differ substantially between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. However, nearly 20% of the patients treated nonsurgically may require eventual ORIF. Distal-third fractures may be at a higher risk of conversion to ORIF, and middle-third fractures may be at a higher risk of nonunion. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Lateral femoral distraction is a safe and necessary adjunct for articulator visualization during the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures.

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests use of lateral femoral distractor (LFD) to aid in visualization during surgery for tibial plateau fractures (TPF) may result in an unacceptably high rate of iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy. We sought to evaluate femoral distractor use for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of TPF and quantify the incidence of peroneal nerve palsy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients undergoing ORIF of TPF between 2014 and 2019 by a single fellowship trained orthopaedic traumatologist at a single Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were use of a LFD during ORIF of TPF. Exclusion criteria were preoperative neurovascular injury in the operative extremity and distraction via pre-existing external fixator. Parameters included patient demographic variables, intraoperative techniques, postoperative outcomes, and fracture classification. Documented clinical exam was used to evaluate peroneal nerve status and injuries were classified as complete or incomplete. Incomplete injuries were classified as sensory or motor. Results: Of 303 patients undergoing ORIF for a TPF, femoral distraction was used in 254 (83.8%) cases, with 201 utilizing applied intraoperative femoral distraction and 53 utilizing pre-existing knee-spanning external fixation for distraction. Three patients were excluded for preoperative sensory peroneal nerve palsy with 175 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The most common fracture type was lateral split depression (n = 130). Zero patients developed complete or incomplete peroneal nerve palsy. Discussion: Our study found no incidence of peroneal nerve palsy when using lateral femoral distraction. This study supports the utilization of lateral distraction for articular visualization and reduction during ORIF of TPF.

Use of Triggers to Detect Adverse Events After Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery at a Single Ambulatory Surgery Center.

Literature on adverse events (AEs) after outpatient orthopedic surgery is relatively sparse, and efforts to detect, measure, and track AEs after outpatient surgery lag behind those for the inpatient setting. Detection of AEs has traditionally relied on patient safety indicators (from billing data) and self-reporting, but these methods have been shown to have low sensitivity, missing up to 90% of AEs. There is growing recognition that the trigger method, which uses "triggers" as red flags to initiate more detailed chart audits, can serve as a more sensitive alternative to detect AEs. Moreover, the recent widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) can provide faster automated methods for identifying triggers and estimating AE rates. This study evaluates the ability of 6 separate EHR-based triggers to predict AEs after outpatient orthopedic surgery and compares this trigger method with AE self-reporting. Triggers have the potential to decrease postoperative morbidity after outpatient orthopedic surgery and may lead to quality improvement. Further research is needed to qualify triggers as screening tools in the outpatient setting. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):116-121.].

Outcomes of Type I Open Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of Delayed and Urgent Open Reduction Internal Fixation.

BACKGROUND: Type I open distal radius fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) have demonstrated minimal risk of infection. For this reason, they may not require urgent surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with type I open distal radius fractures treated with delayed ORIF compared with urgent ORIF. METHODS: We identified all Gustilo-Anderson type I open distal radius fractures that had undergone ORIF using volar plating over a 5-year period. Patients were stratified into those treated urgently within 24 hours and those scheduled for delayed surgery. Outcomes including functional scores, complications, reoperations, and radiographic measures were compared. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (17 treated urgently and 7 treated delayed) had open type I distal radius fractures. All patients were started on empiric antibiotics at initial presentation-patients in the delayed treatment group were prescribed oral antibiotics, whereas those admitted for urgent treatment received intravenous antibiotics. There were no infections in either group and a single reoperation in each group. The mean postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 29 (range = 0-77) and did not differ significantly between delayed (mean = 19) and urgent (mean = 38) treatment. Rate of complications and radiographic measures did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Type I open distal radius fractures appear amenable to delayed outpatient ORIF provided that the wound is clean at the time of initial presentation and that antibiotics are initiated appropriately. Further prospective studies comparing delayed and urgent treatment strategies are warranted.

Does Undergoing Outpatient Hand Surgery Lead to Prolonged Opioid Use? A Comparison of Surgical and Nonsurgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgical patients in general have been found to be at higher risk for developing opioid dependence in the postoperative period. However, there is conflicting evidence in the literature whether opioid exposure after hand surgery leads to prolonged use. In the absence of a nonoperative control group, it is not clear whether prolonged opioid use in hand surgical patients is related to undergoing a surgical intervention. The purpose of our study to compare opioid prescription fulfillment patterns in surgical and nonoperative patients in a hand surgery practice. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 320 patients that underwent elbow, wrist, and hand surgery procedures with 741 nonoperative patients treated by 2 hand surgeons. The Pennsylvania Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP), a mandatory statewide database, was used to evaluate the primary outcomes of filling more than one opioid prescription and filling opioid prescriptions beyond 6 months of the index surgery or clinic visit. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed using the following variables: surgery, prior benzodiazepine use, and prior opioid use. RESULTS: There was no difference in prior opioid use (15.2% vs 16.9%, P = .51) or prior benzodiazepine (10.4% vs 8.4%, P = .33) use between the nonoperative and operative groups. Patients that underwent surgery had a higher incidence of filling more than one opioid prescription (20.9% vs 8.8%, P < .001). However, continued opioid use was not statistically different between nonoperative and operative patients (2.8% vs 5%, P = .08). Bivariate analysis demonstrated that prior opioids (odds ratio [OR] = 12.94, P < .001) and prior benzodiazepines (OR = 1.95, P < .001) were significant independent risk factors for prolonged opioid use. Multivariable analysis demonstrated prior opioid use to be the only independent risk factor for prolonged opioid use (OR = 12.58, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Undergoing outpatient hand surgery do not appear to be an independent risk factor for filling opioid prescriptions beyond 6 months. Significant risk factors for prolonged opioid use include prior use of controlled substances, particularly prior opioid use.

Evaluation of the Incidence and Etiology of Unplanned Return to Operating Room Following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common upper extremity fractures in adults. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence, causes, and independent predictors for unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) in a single institution within 90 days following distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A retrospective study of 2933 consecutive patients from January 2015 to December 2019 who underwent distal radius ORIF was undertaken. Patients who returned to the operating room within 90 days of the index procedure were identified. Patients with planned return to the operating room for staged procedures were excluded, yielding a patient cohort of those with URTO. Demographic data, causes for reoperation, and final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand DASH (QuickDASH) scores were collected. RESULTS: Overall, 45 patients had URTO (1.5%) occurring a mean of 44 (6-89) days from the index procedure. Reasons for reoperation included nerve complications (n = 14), loss of fixation (n = 11), hardware complications (n = 9), wound complications (n = 7), and tendon complications (n = 4). Neurologic reasons for return included carpal tunnel release (n = 13) and ulnar nerve decompression (n = 1). QuickDASH scores were higher for URTO compared with control cohort at the final follow-up (33 [range: 0-91] vs 14 [range: 0-100], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical hardware failure and neurologic symptoms were the most common reasons for URTO after distal fracture ORIF.

Three Dimensionally Printed Versus Conventional Casts in Pediatric Wrist Fractures.

Background and objective With significant advancement in the field of biomaterials, alternatives to conventional fiberglass casts such as customized three-dimensional (3D) orthotics have been developed. However, there is a scarcity of reported experience regarding 3D-printed orthoses. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and patient satisfaction with fractures treated with either conventional or 3D-printed casts. Materials and methods We included 23 limbs from 22 patients, who were aged between 8-18 years, and with a diagnosis of an acute nondisplaced wrist or forearm fracture. Patients were randomized into two groups: consisting of those treated with a 3D-printed orthosis and those with conventional fiberglass cast. Outcomes included X-ray alignment and healing, cast fit, the appearance of the skin, ease of care, and overall satisfaction. Results Of note, 10/11 (91%) in the 3D cast group healed in an excellent position, and 1/11 healed in an acceptable position. Also, 11/12 (92%) in the conventional cast group healed in an excellent position, and 1/12 healed in an acceptable position. Radiographically, 11/11 (100%) of the fractures in the 3D group and 11/12 (92%) in the conventional cast group were found to be fully healed. No differences were found in terms of skin irritation by a blinded hand therapist. Patients reported significant differences in skin irritation, comfort, satisfaction, and cast care favoring 3D casts (p<0.05). Conclusions 3D orthoses offer a promising opportunity to improve patients' experiences with upper extremity casting while also providing appropriate immobilization.

Time to Improvement After Corticosteroid Injection for Trigger Finger.

Purpose Trigger finger is a commonly occurring hand condition that presents with symptoms of pain, clicking, locking, and catching of the finger. A common non-operative management option is corticosteroid injection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term patient response to corticosteroid injections for trigger finger.  Methods The patients of six fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons who underwent a corticosteroid injection for trigger finger between June 2019 and October 2019 were invited to participate in this study. Patients were contacted by phone at one week, two weeks, and three weeks after the injection to complete a questionnaire regarding their pain and triggering symptoms. Medical records were also reviewed to collect basic demographic data. Results A total of 452 patients were included in the study. At the final follow-up, 82.4% of patients reported complete pain relief, 16.3% had partial relief, and 1.2% had no relief from their pain. For their triggering symptoms, 65.9% reported complete triggering relief, 30.4% had partial relief, and 3.5% had no triggering relief. It took an average of 6.6 days following injection for patients to experience complete pain relief, and an average of 8.1 days for patients to experience complete triggering relief. Conclusions This analysis found that most patients experience relief of pain and triggering at three weeks following corticosteroid injection. The majority of patients experienced some pain relief within the first week following corticosteroid injection, while improvement in triggering appeared to lag behind pain relief.

Deep Infection after Distal Radius Open-reduction Internal Fixation: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Given its low incidence, the management of deep infection following distal radius open-reduction internal fixation (ORIF) has not been well reported. In an effort to expand our current understanding, the purpose of this case series is to present the treatment strategies and functional outcomes associated with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. METHODS: All patients with deep infections after distal radius ORIF over a ten-year period were identified and their treatment courses asessed. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of three women and one man with an average age of 55.5 ± 17.6 years. Mean time from infection presentation to irrigation and debridement (I&D) with removal of hardware (ROH) was 16 days (Range: 3 - 44 days). The identified bacterial species in all cases was Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA = 2, MSSA = 2). Three patients were treated with intravenous antibiotics, while one patient was treated with oral antibiotics. Mean time from infection presentation to final clinical follow-up was 11 months (Range: 3 - 20 months). Two patients required repeat I&D. A clinical determination of successful infection eradication was made in all cases. CONCLUSION: The reported rate of deep infection after distal radius ORIF is less than 1%. There is no well-defined treatment algorithm for patients with deep infection after distal radius ORIF. However, removal of hardware and post-operative oral or intravenous antibiotic therapy appears effective, and is consistent with the standard practices of treating infection after other orthopaedic surgeries.

Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Correlates with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score for Common Elbow Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There are currently a variety of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for elbow pathology, without any established gold standard. The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a single question assessment of the patient's perceived overall function compared with normal. The SANE score has been correlated with PROs from the shoulder and knee literature. PURPOSE: To correlate the SANE score for a variety of elbow pathologies with a traditionally reported elbow outcome measure, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow score (ASES-E). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients identified at a single center between April 2016 and January 2019 who presented as a new patient with elbow pathology. All patients prospectively completed the ASES-E along with the SANE score for elbow (SANE-E) at the time of initial consultation. Spearman correlations (r) were performed to evaluate the correlation between the ASES-E and the SANE-E score for specific elbow pathology, along with descriptive data such as age, sex, and chronicity of the problem. RESULTS: A total of 555 patients (166 women, 29.9%) with a mean ± SD age of 51.0 ± 11.7 years with the diagnoses of medial epicondylitis (n = 72; 13.0%), lateral epicondylitis (n = 224; 40.4%), biceps tendon rupture (n = 139; 25.0%), triceps tendon rupture (n = 21; 3.8%), and elbow arthritis (n = 99; 17.8%) were included in this analysis. There was moderate correlation between the SANE-E and the ASES-E (r = 0.623; P < .001), with strongest correlation with the visual analog scale (VAS) (r = -0.518; P < .001) compared with any individual question and moderate to strong correlations based on specific diagnoses. SANE-E and ASES-E scores for the entire cohort were 42.9 ± 26.7 and 56.9 ± 21.4, respectively (P < .001). Age (r = 0.027; P = .526), sex (r = 0.026; P = .555), VAS (r = -0.106; P = .013), and chronicity of the problem (r = -0.037; P = .384) were not found to be correlated with differences in ASES-E and SANE-E. CONCLUSION: The SANE-E score is a simple way to assess patient-perceived function relative to normal. The findings of this study demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between the ASES-E and the SANE-E score for a variety of commonly encountered elbow conditions.

Early Retrieval of Spanning Plates Used for Fixation of Complex Fractures of the Distal Radius.

Background Spanning plates are being increasingly used for the treatment of complex fractures of the distal radius. The traditional recommendation is to leave the hardware in place for at least 12 weeks. Questions/Purpose This study assesses the comparative outcomes of spanning plates removed at or before 10 weeks. We hypothesized that acceptable healing and functional outcomes can be achieved with earlier hardware removal to allow for earlier range of motion, rehabilitation, and return to function. Patients and Methods All patients treated for a comminuted, intra-articular distal radius fracture with a temporary spanning plate were identified. Outcomes of bridge plates removed before 10 weeks were compared with plates removed after 12 weeks. Twenty patients in the short duration cohort were compared with 40 patients in the long duration cohort. Results All fractures healed and there were 10 complications (4 short duration, 6 long duration) and 2 reoperations (1 short duration, 1 long duration) in the study population. There were no significant differences in final Quick-DASH scores (27.4 short duration, 20.9 long duration) or radiographic alignment. Mean values for wrist extension and ulnar deviation were significantly worse in the long duration cohort, although these differences are of unclear clinical significance. Conclusion It may be safe to remove spanning bridge plates earlier than what is traditionally recommended. Plate removal at or before 10 weeks did not detract from healing or radiographic alignment. Prospective investigations assessing the optimal duration of fixation for this technique are needed. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV study.

How Does the Presence of a Surgical Trainee Impact Patient Outcomes in Lumbar Fusion Surgery?

BACKGROUND: While the impact of trainee involvement in other surgical fields is well established, there is a paucity of literature assessing this relationship in orthopaedic spine surgery. The goal of this study was to further elucidate this relationship. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was initiated on patients undergoing 1-3 level lumbar spine fusion at a single academic center. Operative reports from cases were examined, and patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether a fellow or resident (F/R) or a physician's assistant (PA) was used as the primary assist. Patients with less than 1-year follow-up were excluded. Multiple linear regression was used to assess change in each patient-reported outcome, and multiple binary logistic regression was used to determine significant predictors of revision, infection, and 30- or 90-day readmission. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients were included in the F/R group compared with 178 patients in the PA group. No differences existed between groups for total surgery time, length of stay, 30- or 90-day readmissions, infection, or revision rates. No differences existed between groups in terms of patient-reported outcomes preoperatively or postoperatively. In addition, presence of a surgical trainee was not a significant predictor of patient outcomes or rates of infection, overall revision, or 30- and 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate the presence of an orthopaedic spine F/R does not increase complication rates and does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Unplanned Return to the Operating Room in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Incidence and Reason for Return.

PURPOSE: Complications after upper-extremity surgery are generally infrequent. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of early unplanned return to the operating room (URTO) within 3 months after surgery) in upper-extremity surgical procedures. Our hypotheses were that the rate of URTO in upper-extremity surgery would be low and that surgically treated fractures would be at greatest risk for complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all upper-extremity surgical procedures performed at a large academic practice of fellowship-trained hand surgeons over a 5-year period. A chart review was conducted of all patients who underwent a second surgery within 3 months of the initial surgery. The surgical billing database was queried to determine the incidence of URTO per Current Procedural Terminology code. RESULTS: There were 422 Current Procedural Terminology codes with URTO out of a total of 62,608, for an incidence of 0.6%. The most frequently performed procedures were carpal tunnel release (10,674; 0.1% URTO), trigger finger release (4,549; 0.5% URTO), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius fracture (2,728; 1.2% URTO). Procedures with the highest incidences of URTO were open reduction and internal fixation of the ulna (4.9%) and excision of the olecranon bursa (4.1%). Traumatic injuries were more commonly associated with URTO compared with elective procedures. Bony trauma and soft tissue trauma had URTO incidences of 1.4% and 1.1%, respectively, whereas bony elective and soft tissue elective cases were 0.6% and 0.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 90-day URTO rate after upper-extremity surgery was low but higher than previously reported 30-day reoperation rates. Elbow procedures were most likely to result in URTO, as were procedures relating to bony and soft tissue trauma. Based on these results, we are able to counsel patients that the most common procedures we perform have low URTO rates, but surgically treated fractures are at greatest risk. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

The Clinical Impact of Ambient Operating Room Temperature and Other Perioperative Factors on Patient Comfort during Wide-awake Hand Surgery Using Local Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of wide-awake hand surgery using local anesthesia has increased substantially. The full influence of perioperative factors, namely operating room temperature, on patient comfort during these procedures is presently underreported. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients undergoing wide-awake hand surgery using local anesthesia were prospectively enrolled. Surveys with visual analog scale (VAS) were administered after surgery to assess overall patient comfort (OPC) and patient comfort with temperature (TPC). Operating room temperature at the initiation of the procedure, surgery type, duration of surgery, tourniquet use and local anesthetic use were all recorded and their impact on patient comfort analyzed. The VAS used ranged from 1 (least comfortable) to 5 (most comfortable). RESULTS: Across all patients, the mean OPC was 4.7 (Range: 2 - 5, SD=0.6) and the mean TPC score was 4.7 (Range 2 - 5, SD=0.6). There were weakly negative correlations between room temperature and VAS score for OPC (rs =-0.2, p =.038) and TPC (rs=-0.2, p =.051). The mean OPC score was lower with tourniquet use [4.6 (SD=0.7) versus 4.9 (SD=0.4), p =.002]. CONCLUSION: Patient comfort during surgery using local anesthesia is not substantially affected by operating room temperature. Tourniquet use negatively impacts patient-reported comfort. Continued studies into the optimization of patient comfort during wide-awake hand surgery are warranted.