A novel method to quantify breathing effort from respiratory mechanics and esophageal pressure.

Breathing effort is important to quantify to understand mechanisms underlying central and obstructive sleep apnea, respiratory-related arousals, and the timing and effectiveness of invasive or noninvasive mechanically assisted ventilation. Current quantitative methods to evaluate breathing effort rely on inspiratory esophageal or epiglottic pressure swings or changes in diaphragm electromyographic (EMG) activity, where units are problematic to interpret and compare between individuals and to measured ventilation. This paper derives a novel method to quantify breathing effort in units directly comparable with measured ventilation by applying respiratory mechanics first principles to convert continuous transpulmonary pressure measurements into "attempted" airflow expected to have arisen without upper airway obstruction. The method was evaluated using data from 11 subjects undergoing overnight polysomnography, including six patients with obesity with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), including one who also had frequent central events, and five healthy-weight controls. Classic respiratory mechanics showed excellent fits of airflow and volume to transpulmonary pressures during wake periods of stable unobstructed breathing (means ± SD, r2 = 0.94 ± 0.03), with significantly higher respiratory system resistance in patients compared with healthy controls (11.2 ± 3.3 vs. 7.1 ± 1.9 cmH2O·L-1·s, P = 0.032). Subsequent estimates of attempted airflow from transpulmonary pressure changes clearly highlighted periods of acute and prolonged upper airway obstruction, including within the first few breaths following sleep onset in patients with OSA. This novel technique provides unique quantitative insights into the complex and dynamically changing interrelationships between breathing effort and achieved airflow during periods of obstructed breathing in sleep.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ineffective breathing efforts with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are challenging to quantify. Measurements of esophageal or epiglottic pressure swings and diaphragm electromyography are useful, but units are problematic to interpret and compare between individuals and to measured ventilation. This paper derives a novel method that uses esophageal pressure and respiratory mechanics first principles to quantify breathing effort as "attempted" flow and volume in units directly comparable with measured airflow, volume, and ventilation.

Comparative Effectiveness of Supine Avoidance versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treating Supine-isolated Sleep Apnea: A Clinical Trial.

Rationale: About 20-35% of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have supine-isolated OSA, for which supine sleep avoidance could be an effective therapy. However, traditional supine discomfort-based methods show poor tolerance and compliance to treatment and so cannot be recommended. Supine alarm devices show promise, but evidence to support favorable adherence to treatment and effectiveness at reducing excessive daytime sleepiness compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) remains limited. Objectives: To establish if alarm-based supine-avoidance treatment in patients with supine-isolated OSA is noninferior to CPAP in reducing daytime sleepiness. Methods: After baseline questionnaire administration and in-home supine-time and polysomnography assessments, patients with supine-isolated OSA and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores ⩾8 were randomized to ⩾6 weeks of supine-avoidance or CPAP treatment, followed by crossover to the remaining treatment with repeat assessments. Noninferiority was assessed from change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale with supine avoidance compared with CPAP using a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.5. Average nightly treatment use over all nights and treatment efficacy and effectiveness at reducing respiratory disturbances were also compared between treatments. Results: The reduction in sleepiness score with supine avoidance (mean [95% confidence interval], -1.9 [-2.8 to -1.0]) was noninferior to that with CPAP (-2.4 [-3.3 to -1.4]) (supine avoidance-CPAP difference, -0.4 [-1.3 to 0.6]), and the lower confidence limit did not cross the noninferiority margin of 1.5 (P = 0.021). Average treatment use was higher with supine avoidance compared with CPAP (mean ± standard deviation, 5.7 ± 2.4 vs. 3.9 ± 2.7 h/night; P < 0.001). Conclusions: In patients with supine-isolated OSA, vibrotactile supine alarm device therapy is noninferior to CPAP for reducing sleepiness and shows superior treatment adherence. Clinical trial registered with www.anzctr.org.au (ACTRN 12613001242718).

General practitioner assessment and management of insomnia in adults.

BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbance is among the most prevalent presentations in Australian general practice. Insomnia, the most common sleep disorder, is associated with impaired daytime, social and occupational function, reduced quality of life and substantially increased risk of future depression. Guidelines from Australian and international general practice, sleep and medical societies strongly recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-i) as the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia. This is because CBT-i targets the underlying causes of insomnia, results in sustained improvements and commonly improves comorbid conditions such as depression and pain. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to provide an overview of evidence-based assessment, management and referral options for insomnia in Australian general practice. DISCUSSION: Access to brief insomnia assessment and evidenced-based treatments are becoming increasingly available to Australian general practitioners. CBT-i can be delivered through self-guided online programs or by suitably trained general practitioners and psychologists.

Central sleep apnea treated by a constant low-dose CO2 supplied by a novel device.

CO2 inhalation has been previously reported as a treatment for central sleep apnea both when associated with heart failure or where the cause is unknown. Here, we evaluated a novel CO2 supply system using a novel open mask capable of comfortably delivering a constantly inspired fraction of CO2 ([Formula: see text]) during sleep. We recruited 18 patients with central sleep apnea (13 patients with cardiac disease, and 5 patients idiopathic) diagnosed by diaphragm electromyogram (EMG) recordings made during overnight full polysomnography (PSG) (night 1). In each case, the optimal [Formula: see text] was determined by an overnight manual titration with PSG (night 2). Titration commenced at 1% CO2 and increased by 0.2% increments until central sleep apnea (CSA) disappeared. Patients were then treated on the third night (night 3) with the lowest therapeutically effective concentration of CO2 derived from night 2. Comparing night 1 and night 3, both apnea-hypopnea index (AHI; 31 ± 14 vs. 6 ± 3 events/h, P < 0.01) and arousal index (22 ± 8 vs. 15 ± 8 events/h, P < 0.01) were significantly improved during CO2 treatment. Sleep efficiency improved from 71 ± 18 to 80 ± 11%, P < 0.05, and sleep latency was shorter (23 ± 18 vs. 10 ± 10 min, P < 0.01). Heart rate was not different between night 1 and night 3. Our data confirm the feasibility of our CO2 delivery system and indicate that individually titrated CO2 supplementation with a novel device including a special open mask can reduce sleep disordered breathing severity and improve sleep quality. Randomized controlled studies should now be undertaken to assess therapeutic benefit for patients with CSA.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A novel device using a special mask was developed and proved that CO2 therapy using the device could eliminate central sleep apnea (CSA) events and improve sleep quality including reducing arousal index in patients with heart failure. The device would become a useful clinical treatment for heart failure patients with CSA.

Strategies to Assess the Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Long-Term Clinically Important Outcomes among Patients with Symptomatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although CPAP improves symptoms (e.g., daytime sleepiness), there is a lack of high-quality evidence that CPAP prevents many long-term outcomes, including cognitive impairment, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Observational studies suggest that patients with symptoms may be particularly likely to experience these preventive benefits with CPAP, but ethical and practical concerns limited the participation of such patients in prior long-term randomized trials. As a result, there is uncertainty about the full benefits of CPAP, and resolving this uncertainty is a key priority for the field. This workshop assembled clinicians, researchers, ethicists, and patients to identify strategies to understand the causal effects of CPAP on long-term clinically important outcomes among patients with symptomatic OSA. Quasi-experimental designs can provide valuable information and are less time and resource intensive than trials. Under specific conditions and assumptions, quasi-experimental studies may be able to provide causal estimates of CPAP's effectiveness from generalizable observational cohorts. However, randomized trials represent the most reliable approach to understanding the causal effects of CPAP among patients with symptoms. Randomized trials of CPAP can ethically include patients with symptomatic OSA, as long as there is outcome-specific equipoise, adequate informed consent, and a plan to maximize safety while minimizing harm (e.g., monitoring for pathologic sleepiness). Furthermore, multiple strategies exist to ensure the generalizability and practicality of future randomized trials of CPAP. These strategies include reducing the burden of trial procedures, improving patient-centeredness, and engaging historically excluded and underserved populations.

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with a simple CPAP device.

PURPOSE: CPAP is the "gold standard" treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Current CPAP models have developed additional functions including automatic CPAP and pressure relief. However, CPAP adherence has not improved over the last three decades. Many patients in low-income countries cannot afford these CPAP devices. A novel simple CPAP device with a fixed pressure without pressure controller was developed. METHODS: Manual CPAP pressure titration was performed in 127 patients with OSA. Six patients with a titration pressure higher than 11 cmH2O and 14 patients who could not tolerate CPAP were excluded, leaving 107 participating in the following 2 studies. In study one, 54 of 107 patients were treated by both conventional fixed CPAP and simple CPAP in random order. In the second study, another 53 patients were treated by both autoCPAP in automatic function and simple CPAP in random order. Simple CPAP was fixed at 10 cmH2O, 8 cmH2O, and 6 cmH2O for patients whose titration pressure was between 9-10, 7-8, and ≤ 6 cmH2O, respectively. Conventional fixed CPAP device was set exactly the same as manual titration pressure. RESULTS: All patients whose manual titration pressure ≤ 10 cmH2O were effectively treated by simple CPAP (AHI 40.7 ± 2.3 events/h before vs 2.5 ± 0.3 events/h after, p < 0.001). Patients expressed similar preferences for simple CPAP, autoCPAP, and conventional fixed CPAP (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a novel simple CPAP is an alternative treatment for most patients with OSA, which may widen access to CPAP therapy in the developing countries because of its low cost.

High night-to-night variability in sleep apnea severity is associated with uncontrolled hypertension.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity can vary markedly from night-to-night. However, the impact of night-to-night variability in OSA severity on key cardiovascular outcomes such as hypertension is unknown. Thus, the primary aim of this study is to determine the effects of night-to-night variability in OSA severity on hypertension likelihood. This study uses in-home monitoring of 15,526 adults with ~180 nights per participant with an under-mattress sleep sensor device, plus ~30 repeat blood pressure measures. OSA severity is defined from the mean estimated apnea-hypopnoea index (AHI) over the ~6-month recording period for each participant. Night-to-night variability in severity is determined from the standard deviation of the estimated AHI across recording nights. Uncontrolled hypertension is defined as mean systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or mean diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg. Regression analyses are performed adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index. A total of 12,287 participants (12% female) are included in the analyses. Participants in the highest night-to-night variability quartile within each OSA severity category, have a 50-70% increase in uncontrolled hypertension likelihood versus the lowest variability quartile, independent of OSA severity. This study demonstrates that high night-to-night variability in OSA severity is a predictor of uncontrolled hypertension, independent of OSA severity. These findings have important implications for the identification of which OSA patients are most at risk of cardiovascular harm.

Single-Night Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea Contributes to Inconsistent Cardiovascular Outcome Findings.

BACKGROUND: Single-night disease misclassification of OSA due to night-to-night variability may contribute to inconsistent findings in OSA trials. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does multinight quantification of OSA severity provide more precise estimates of associations with incident hypertension? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 3,831 participants without hypertension at baseline were included in simulation analyses. Included participants had ≥ 28 days of nightly apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) recordings via an under-mattress sensor and ≥ three separate BP measurements over a 3-month baseline period followed by ≥ three separate BP measurements 6 to 9 months postbaseline. Incident hypertension was defined as a mean systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg or a mean diastolic BP ≥ 90 mm Hg. Simulated trials (1,000) were performed, using bootstrap methods to investigate the effect of variable numbers of nights (x = 1-56 per participant) to quantify AHI and the ability to detect associations between OSA and incident hypertension via logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. RESULTS: Participants were middle-aged (mean ± SD, 52 ± 12 y), mostly male (91%), and overweight (BMI, 28 ± 5 kg/m2). Single-night quantification of OSA failed to detect an association with hypertension risk in 42% of simulated trials (α = .05). Conversely, 100% of trials detected an association when AHI was quantified over ≥ 28 nights. Point estimates of hypertension risk were also 50% higher and uncertainty was five times lower during multinight vs single-night simulation trials. INTERPRETATION: Multinight monitoring of OSA allows for better estimates of hypertension risk and potentially other adverse health outcomes associated with OSA. These findings have important implications for clinical care and OSA trial design.

The changes of AHI after long-term CPAP in patients with comorbid OSA and cardiovascular disease.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on disease severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: We analyzed results from the Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Events (SAVE) study involving participants recruited at the Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, China. Participants were aged 45-75 years with a history of cardiac or cerebrovascular disease. OSA was confirmed by home sleep apnea testing (HSAT). Participants were randomized to receive CPAP plus standard cardiovascular care (CPAP group) or standard care alone (UC group) and followed for several years. At the study conclusion, surviving participants were invited to repeat HSAT. Changes in OSA indicators were compared by independent samples t-tests and subgroup analysis was implied among groups stratified by OSA severity. RESULTS: One hundred two adults were recruited (51 per group) and followed for 48.0 ± 14.5 months. Daily CPAP usage in the CPAP group was 4.1 ± 1.9 h. AHI decreased from baseline to end-of-study in both CPAP and UC groups (- 5.0 (- 12.5,2.0), P = 0.000; - 4.0 (- 12.5,1.5), P = 0.007, respectively), with no between-group difference (P = 0.453). An improvement in nadir SpO2 showed from baseline to end-of-study in the CPAP but not UC group (2.3% ± 6.1%, P = 0.011 and - 0.7% ± 7.6%, P = 0.511, respectively; between-group difference P = 0.032). Subgroup analysis shows that CPAP could improve AHI in patients with moderate OSA (- 8.0 (- 11.8, - 2.8) in CPAP group, - 2.0 (- 0.8,6.0) in UC group, P = 0.022) and improve nadir SpO2 in patients with severe OSA (5.0 (- 0.8, - 0.8,7.0) in CPAP group, 0.0 (- 8.5,2.5) in UC group, P = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Long-term CPAP use did not result in clinically significant changes in AHI or ODI overall but showed variable effects stratified by OSA severity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: Clinical Trials.gov, title: Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease (SAVE), URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , identifier: NCT00738179.

Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered chronic disease management within general practice: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review is to identify the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases to inform the development and evaluation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic sleep disorders. INTRODUCTION: Increasing prevalence of sleep disorders and subsequent demand for specialist-led sleep services has prompted investigation into the management of uncomplicated sleep disorders by general practitioners. Models of sleep health care with enhanced roles for general practice nurses have been investigated within the context of randomized controlled trials; however, it is unclear how best to implement these models into clinical practice. With limited research exploring the implementation of nurse-delivered models of sleep health care within general practice, this review will examine the barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic disease. This will inform the integration of new nurse-delivered models of care for chronic sleep disorders into routine general practice. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies that report barriers and facilitators for the implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases for adults into a general practice setting will be included. METHODS: Six databases will be searched: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Emcare. The search will be limited to qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies. Studies will be included if they contain data that report on barriers and facilitators for implementation of nurse-delivered models of care for chronic diseases. This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI approach to mixed methods convergent integrated systematic reviews. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42021273346.

Respiratory Polygraphy Patterns and Risk of Recurrent Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity is based on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). The AHI is a simplistic measure that is inadequate for capturing disease severity and its consequences in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Deleterious effects of OSA have been suggested to influence the prognosis of specific endotypes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aim to identify respiratory polygraphy (RP) patterns that contribute to identifying the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with ACS. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the ISAACC study, including 723 patients admitted for a first ACS (NCT01335087) in which RP was performed. To identify specific RP patterns, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using six RP parameters: AHI, oxygen desaturation index, mean and minimum oxygen saturation (SaO2), average duration of events and percentage of time with SaO2 < 90%. An independent HypnoLaus population-based cohort was used to validate the RP components. Results: From the ISAACC study, PCA showed that two RP components accounted for 70% of the variance in the RP data. These components were validated in the HypnoLaus cohort, with two similar RP components that explained 71.3% of the variance in the RP data. The first component (component 1) was mainly characterized by low mean SaO2 and obstructive respiratory events with severe desaturation, and the second component (component 2) was characterized by high mean SaO2 and long-duration obstructive respiratory events without severe desaturation. In the ISAACC cohort, component 2 was associated with an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in the third tertile with an adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.44 (1.07 to 5.56; p-value = 0.03) compared to first tertile. For component 1, no significant association was found for the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Conclusion: A RP component, mainly characterized by intermittent hypoxemia, is associated with a high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients without previous CVD who have suffered a first ACS.

Long-Term Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Blood Pressure in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Clinical Trial.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is prevalent in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is a cause of secondary hypertension. Objectives: To explore the long-term effects of OSA and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure (BP) in patients with ACS. Methods: Post hoc analysis of the ISAACC study (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea; NCT01335087) included 1,803 patients admitted for ACS. Patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], ⩾15 events/h) were randomly assigned to receive either CPAP or usual care and were seen in follow-up for 1-5 years. Office BP was determined at each visit. Results: We included 596 patients without OSA, 978 patients in the usual care or poor CPAP adherence group, and 229 patients in the good CPAP adherence group. At baseline, 52% of the patients were diagnosed with hypertension. Median (25th to 75th percentile) age and body mass index were 59 (52.0 to 67.0) years and 28.2 (25.6 to 31.2) kg/m2, respectively. After a median (25th to 75th percentile) follow-up of 41.2 (18.3 to 59.6) months, BP changes were similar in the OSA and non-OSA groups. However, we observed an increase in BP in the third tertile of the AHI (AHI, >40 events/h), with a maximum difference in mean BP of +3.3 mm Hg at 30 months. Patients with OSA with good CPAP adherence (⩾4 h/night) reduced mean BP after 18 months compared with patients with usual care/poor CPAP adherence, with a maximum mean difference (95% confidence interval) of -4.7 (-6.7 to -2.7) mm Hg. In patients with severe OSA, we observed a maximum mean difference of -7.1 (-10.3 to -3.8) mm Hg. Conclusions: In patients with ACS, severe OSA is associated with a long-term increase in BP, which is reduced by good CPAP adherence. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01335087).

Economic evaluation of diagnostic sleep studies for obstructive sleep apnoea in the adult population: a systematic review.

Evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of limited channel tests compared to laboratory and home polysomnography (PSG) in diagnosing obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is unclear. Eligible studies were systematically sought across the following databases: MEDLINE, PsychINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, Cochrane, Emcare, Web of Science and ProQuest. Title and abstracts were screened before full-text review. Only full and partial economic evaluations reporting at least one economic outcome were included. A standardised template was used for critical appraisal and data extraction. Relevant findings were summarised using a qualitative approach adhering to economic reporting standards. Literature searches identified 999 non-duplicate abstracts, where 85 studies were retrieved for full-text review. The number of studies that met eligibility criteria and were included in the final analyses was 35, of which 31 investigated Level 3 and four assessed Level 4 tests. Based on the dominance ranking framework, both Level 3 and Level 4 tests were cost-effective compared to PSG. Although study designs and methodologies differ broadly, the findings indicated that using limited channel diagnostic sleep tests for OSA is associated with lower costs and non-inferior health outcomes relative to PSG. Limited channel tests also resulted in shorter waiting times and improved access to diagnostic services for patients with OSA. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020150130.

Preferred Attributes of Care Pathways for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea from the Perspective of Diagnosed Patients and High-Risk Individuals: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

BACKGROUND: The current healthcare system is challenged with a large and rising demand for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) services. A paradigm shift in OSA management is required to incorporate the preferences of diagnosed patients and individuals at high risk of OSA. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to provide empirical evidence of the values and preferences of individuals diagnosed with OSA and high-risk populations regarding distinct OSA care pathway features. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was undertaken in two groups: those with a formal diagnosis of OSA (n = 421) and those undiagnosed but at high risk of having OSA (n = 1033). Participants were recruited from a large cross-sectional survey in Australia. The discrete choice experiment approach used mixed-logit regression models to determine preferences relating to eight salient features of the OSA management pathway, i.e. initial assessment provider, sleep study setting, diagnosis costs, waiting times, results interpretation, treatment options, provider of ongoing care and frequency of follow-up visits. RESULTS: The findings indicate that all eight attributes investigated were statistically significant factors for respondents. Generally, both groups preferred low diagnostic costs, fewer follow-up visits, minimum waiting time for sleep study results and sleep specialists to recommend treatment. Management of OSA in primary care was acceptable to both groups and was the most preferred option by the high-risk group for the initial assessment, sleep study testing and ongoing care provision. CONCLUSIONS: The discrete choice experiment results offer a promising approach for systematic incorporation of patient and high-risk group preferences into the future design and delivery of care pathways for OSA management.

The association of co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea with prevalent cardiovascular disease and incident cardiovascular events.

Insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea commonly co-occur (co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea), and their co-occurrence has been associated with worse cardiometabolic and mental health. However, it remains unknown if people with co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea are at a heightened risk of incident cardiovascular events. This study used longitudinal data from the Sleep Heart Health Study (N = 5803) to investigate potential associations between co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease prevalence at baseline and cardiovascular event incidence over ~11 years follow-up. Insomnia was defined as self-reported difficulties initiating and/or maintaining sleep AND daytime impairment. Obstructive sleep apnea was defined as an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events per hr sleep. Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea was defined if both conditions were present. Data from 4160 participants were used for this analysis. The prevalence of no insomnia/obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia only, obstructive sleep apnea only and co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea was 53.2%, 3.1%, 39.9% and 1.9%, respectively. Co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea was associated with a 75% (odd ratios [95% confidence interval]; 1.75 [1.14, 2.67]) increase in likelihood of having cardiovascular disease at baseline after adjusting for pre-specified confounders. In the unadjusted model, co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea was associated with a twofold increase (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval: 2.00 [1.33, 2.99]) in risk of cardiovascular event incidence. However, after adjusting for pre-specified covariates, co-morbid insomnia and sleep apnea was not significantly associated with incident cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.38 [0.92, 2.07]). Comparable findings were obtained when an alternative definition of insomnia (difficulties initiating and/or maintaining sleep without daytime impairment) was used.

Brain mitochondrial dysfunction and driving simulator performance in untreated obstructive sleep apnea.

It is challenging to determine which patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have impaired driving ability. Vulnerability to this neurobehavioral impairment may be explained by lower brain metabolites levels involved in mitochondrial metabolism. This study compared markers of brain energy metabolism in OSA patients identified as vulnerable vs resistant to driving impairment following extended wakefulness. 44 patients with moderate-severe OSA underwent 28hr extended wakefulness with three 90min driving simulation assessments. Using a two-step cluster analysis, objective driving data (steering deviation and crashes) from the 2nd driving assessment (22.5 h awake) was used to categorise patients into vulnerable (poor driving, n = 21) or resistant groups (good driving, n = 23). 1 H magnetic resonance spectra were acquired at baseline using two scan sequences (short echo PRESS and longer echo-time asymmetric PRESS), focusing on key metabolites, creatine, glutamate, N-acetylaspartate (NAA) in the hippocampus, anterior cingulate cortex and left orbito-frontal cortex. Based on cluster analysis, the vulnerable group had impaired driving performance compared with the resistant group and had lower levels of creatine (PRESS p = ns, APRESS p = 0.039), glutamate, (PRESS p < 0.01, APRESS p < 0.01), NAA (PRESS p = 0.038, APRESS p = 0.035) exclusively in the left orbito-frontal cortex. Adjusted analysis, higher glutamate was associated with a 21% (PRESS) and 36% (APRESS) reduced risk of vulnerable classification. Brain mitochondrial bioenergetics in the frontal brain regions are impaired in OSA patients who are vulnerable to driving impairment following sleep loss. These findings provide a potential way to identify at risk OSA phenotype when assessing fitness to drive, but this requires confirmation in larger future studies.

Primary versus Specialist Care for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Individual-Participant Data-Level Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: Primary care clinicians may be well placed to play a greater role in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management. Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of sleep apnea management in primary versus specialist care, using an individual-participant data meta-analysis to determine whether age, sex, severity of OSA, and daytime sleepiness impacted outcomes. Methods: Data sources were the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid SP, Scopus, ProQuest, U.S. National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register, and ISRCTN registry (inception until 09-25-2019). Hand searching was undertaken. Two authors independently assessed articles and included trials that randomized adults with a suspected diagnosis of sleep apnea to primary versus specialist management within the same study and reported daytime sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (range 0-24; >10 indicates pathological sleepiness; minimum clinically important difference 2 units) at baseline and follow-up. Results: The primary analysis combined data from 970 (100%) participants (four trials). Risk of bias was assessed (Cochrane Tool). One-stage intention-to-treat analysis showed a slightly smaller decrease in daytime sleepiness (0.8; 0.2 to 1.4), but greater reduction in diastolic blood pressure in primary care (-1.9; -3.2 to -0.6 mm Hg), with similar findings in the per-protocol analysis. Primary care-based within-trial healthcare system costs per participant were lower (-$448.51 U.S.), and quality-adjusted life years and daytime sleepiness improvements were less expensive. Similar primary outcome results were obtained for subgroups in both management settings. Conclusions: Similar outcomes in primary care at a lower cost provide strong support for implementation of primary care-based management of sleep apnea.

Multinight Prevalence, Variability, and Diagnostic Misclassification of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Recent studies suggest that obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity can vary markedly from night to night, which may have important implications for diagnosis and management. Objectives: This study aimed to assess OSA prevalence from multinight in-home recordings and the impact of night-to-night variability in OSA severity on diagnostic classification in a large, global, nonrandomly selected community sample from a consumer database of people that purchased a novel, validated, under-mattress sleep analyzer. Methods: A total of 67,278 individuals aged between 18 and 90 years underwent in-home nightly monitoring over an average of approximately 170 nights per participant between July 2020 and March 2021. OSA was defined as a nightly mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of more than 15 events/h. Outcomes were multinight global prevalence and likelihood of OSA misclassification from a single night's AHI value. Measurements and Main Results: More than 11.6 million nights of data were collected and analyzed. OSA global prevalence was 22.6% (95% confidence interval, 20.9-24.3%). The likelihood of misdiagnosis in people with OSA based on a single night ranged between approximately 20% and 50%. Misdiagnosis error rates decreased with increased monitoring nights (e.g., 1-night F1-score = 0.77 vs. 0.94 for 14 nights) and remained stable after 14 nights of monitoring. Conclusions: Multinight in-home monitoring using novel, noninvasive under-mattress sensor technology indicates a global prevalence of moderate to severe OSA of approximately 20%, and that approximately 20% of people diagnosed with a single-night study may be misclassified. These findings highlight the need to consider night-to-night variation in OSA diagnosis and management.

Clinical predictors of working memory performance in obstructive sleep apnea patients before and during extended wakefulness.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Extended wakefulness (EW) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) impair working memory (WM), but their combined effects are unclear. This study examined the impact of EW on WM function in OSA patients and identified clinical predictors of WM impairment. METHODS: Following polysomnography (PSG), 56 OSA patients (mean ± SD, age 49.5 ± 8.9, apnea hypopnea index 38.1 ± 25.0) completed WM 2-back performance tasks 10 times over 24 h of wakefulness to assess average accuracy and completion times measured after 6-12 h awake (baseline) compared to 18-24 h awake (EW). Hierarchical cluster analysis classified participants with poorer versus better WM performance at baseline and during EW. Clinical predictors of performance were examined via regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses. RESULTS: WM performance decreased following EW and showed consistent correlations with age, Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), total sleep time, and hypoxemia (O2 nadir and mean O2 desaturation) at baseline and with EW (all p < .01). O2 nadir and age were significant independent predictors of performance at baseline (adjusted R2 = 0.30, p < .01), while O2 nadir and ESS were predictors of WM following EW (adjusted R2 = 0.38, p < .001). ROC analysis demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity of models to predict poorer versus better performing participants at baseline (83% and 69%) and during EW (84% and 74%). CONCLUSIONS: O2 nadir, age, and sleepiness show prognostic value for predicting WM impairment in both rested and sleep-deprived OSA patients and may guide clinicians in identifying patients most at risk of impaired WM under both rested and heightened sleep pressure conditions.Clinical Trial Registration: This manuscript presents data collected as part of a larger trial-ANZCTR: Novel brain biomarkers of performance impairment in sleep apnea-https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=363830, No. ACTRN12613001171707.