Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 73(3): 203-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19783073

ABSTRACT

To increase local influenza vaccination uptake among healthcare workers (HCWs), a co-ordinated, area-wide influenza vaccination campaign was undertaken in 2008 for five hospitals in the South Metropolitan Area Health Service of Perth, Western Australia (WA). The programme included standardised marketing and data collection, with a consent form completed by each recipient. Denominator data were obtained from the WA Department of Health's staff database. Vaccination coverage at each hospital was calculated and compared with that of 2007, with predictors for vaccination determined using a follow-up cross-sectional survey. A total of 6387 influenza vaccinations were administered. The coverage rate was above 55% in all but one hospital (range: 48.8-76.5%) whereas in 2007 no hospital achieved 55% (range: 29-51%). Allied health professionals attained the highest coverage (57.7%), followed by doctors (51.9%), nurses (49.6%) and patient support staff (48.6%). Of HCWs who worked half-time or more, 58.8% were vaccinated. The main reasons for vaccination were to prevent influenza, limit spread, and the programme's availability. The survey revealed that HCWs who perceived that they were susceptible to influenza, that it was a serious disease and that immunisation was effective and important were significantly more likely to be vaccinated. An area-wide approach to HCW influenza vaccination can substantially improve uptake. Regular working party meetings, consistent marketing, standardised data collection and analysis, and senior management support were key elements and could be used by others to attain good vaccination coverage among HCWs.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Catchment Area, Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Western Australia
2.
Breast ; 16(4): 375-81, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17448661

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether 5-year survival of patients with breast cancer in Western Australia has improved over time. We used a population-based study conducted in the State of Western Australia, to identify all cases of invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed in 1989, 1994 and 1999. Information on presentation, investigation and management was extracted from medical records of each case and status at 5 years after date of diagnosis was determined. Comparison of 5-year overall survival for women diagnosed in the three calendar years, and hazard ratios for survival calculated for prognostic variables were measured. We found that survival from breast cancer has improved in Western Australia since 1989. Earlier diagnosis, living in the Perth metropolitan area and use of breast-conserving surgery are associated with better survival, irrespective of year of diagnosis. Further research needs to be carried out to determine the reason for this improvement.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Western Australia/epidemiology
3.
Inj Prev ; 12(4): 242-7, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16887946

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence and effects of distracting activities while driving. DESIGN: Cross sectional driver survey. SETTING: New South Wales and Western Australia, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 1347 licensed drivers aged between 18 and 65 years. Data were weighted to reflect the corresponding driving population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of distracting activities while driving; perceived risks and adverse outcomes due to distractions. RESULTS: The most common distracting activities during the most recent driving trip were lack of concentration (weighted percentage (standard error, SE) 71.8% (1.4%) of drivers); adjusting in-vehicle equipment (68.7% (1.5%)); outside people, objects or events (57.8% (1.6%)); and talking to passengers (39.8% (1.6%)). On average, a driver engaged in a distracting activity once every six minutes. One in five crashes (21%) during the last three years, involving one in 20 drivers (5.0% (0.7%)), was attributed to driver distraction based on self-report. In the population under study, this equated to 242,188 (SE 34,417) drivers. Younger drivers (18-30 years) were significantly more likely to report distracting activities, to perceive distracting activities as less dangerous, and to have crashed as a result. CONCLUSIONS: Distracting activities while driving are common and can result in driving errors. Driver distraction is an important cause of crashes. Further research is needed to estimate the risk conferred by different distracting activities and the circumstances during which activities pose greatest risk. These results suggest that a strategy to minimize distracting activities while driving, with a focus on young drivers, is indicated.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Attention , Automobile Driving , Risk-Taking , Accidents, Traffic/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , New South Wales , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Western Australia
4.
Breast ; 15(6): 769-76, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16765049

ABSTRACT

From all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in 1999 in Western Australia, rural and urban women were compared with regard to mode of detection, tumour characteristics at presentation, diagnostic investigations, treatment and survival. Women from rural areas with breast cancer (n=206, 23%) were less likely to have open biopsy with frozen section (P<0.001), breast-conserving surgery (P<0.001), adjuvant radiotherapy (P=0.004) and hormonal therapy (P=0.03), and were less likely to be treated by a high caseload breast cancer surgeon (P<0.001). Adjusting for age and tumour characteristics, rural women had an increased likelihood of death within 5 years of breast cancer diagnosis (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.10-2.38). This difference was not significant after adjustment for treatment factors (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.90-2.04).


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Rural Health , Urban Health , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Mammography/statistics & numerical data , Mastectomy/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate , Western Australia/epidemiology
6.
Breast ; 14(1): 11-7, 2005 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15695075

ABSTRACT

We have assessed the outcomes for all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in Western Australia during 1989, 1994 and 1999, and compared the results for surgeons who treat 20 or more cases per year with those of surgeons who treat less. Women treated by high caseload surgeons were more likely to retain their breast (53.3% vs. 36.7%, p<0.001), have adjuvant radiotherapy (50.0% vs. 30.6%, p<0.001), and be alive after 4 years (1989, 86% vs. 82%; 1994, 89% vs. 84%; 1999, 90% vs. 79%, HR 0.71, p=0.03). Adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, women were not more likely to be treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (29.2% vs. 20.9%, p=0.28). In 1989 35% of women were treated by high caseload surgeons. By 1999 this had risen to 82%. The results confirm that women treated by high caseload surgeons have better outcomes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Professional Competence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , Western Australia
7.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 6 Suppl 1: 156-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14606549

ABSTRACT

Digital technologies are gaining wider acceptance within the medical and dental professions. The lure of increased productivity and improved quality entice practices to adapt. These systems are beginning to have a profound impact on the workflows within the practice, as well as putting new demands on existing resources. To successfully implement a new technology within your practice, you must look beyond advertising and discover the real requirements of the system. Vendors rarely try to help beyond the sale and installation of their equipment, nor do they consider how their product might require you to modify the way you and your staff work. Acquiring the necessary knowledge through self-education, a consultant, or (preferably) a combination of the two is the best way to integrate a new technology with your practice.


Subject(s)
Medical Informatics Applications , Practice Management, Dental , Technology, Dental , Computer Systems , Efficiency, Organizational , Humans , Practice Management, Dental/economics , Practice Management, Dental/organization & administration , Radiography, Dental, Digital , Radiography, Panoramic , Systems Integration
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...