Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
J Food Prot ; 76(12): 2045-51, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24290680

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to investigate antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli isolates from broiler chickens in Alberta, Canada. Cecal contents of broiler chickens from 24 flocks were collected at slaughter between January and March 2005 for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing against a panel of 15 antimicrobials using a broth microdilution technique. Of 600 E. coli isolates tested, 475 (79.2%) were resistant to one or more antimicrobials, 326 (54.3%) were resistant to three or more antimicrobials, 65 (10.8%) were resistant to five or more antimicrobials, and 15 (2.5%) were resistant to seven or more antimicrobials. The most common resistance was to tetracycline (69.2%), followed by streptomycin (48.2%), kanamycin (40.3%), and sulfisoxazole (38.0%). None of the E. coli isolates were resistant to amikacin, ceftriaxone, or ciprofloxacin. Of the isolates that were resistant to two or more antimicrobials, the most common multidrug resistance patterns were streptomycinte-tracycline (44.0%), streptomycin-sulfisoxazole-tetracycline (30.7%), and kanamycin-streptomycin-sulfisoxazole-tetracycline (23.5%). Resistance to tetracycline and kanamycin (odds ratio = 46.7, P = 0.0001) was highly associated, followed by resistance to streptomycin and sulfisoxazole (odds ratio = 12.0, P = 0.0001), and streptomycin and tetracycline (odds ratio = 10.3, P = 0.0001). The flock level prevalence of resistance varied from 16.7% for chloramphenicol to 100.0% for ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline. The results of this study provided baseline information on antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli isolates of broiler chickens at slaughter in Alberta, which can serve as a bench mark for future research.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Chickens/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Food Contamination/analysis , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Prevalence
2.
Can J Vet Res ; 75(4): 308-11, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22468029

ABSTRACT

Among grow-to-finish pigs from 10 herds in Alberta and Saskatchewan, 23 (16%) of 144 fecal samples were culture-positive and 40 (28%) of 144 pigs were seropositive for Salmonella. With a Bayesian model specifying dependence between the 2 tests, the sensitivity (Se) of culture and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was 79% to 86%, depending on the cut-off value for the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Culture specificity (Sp) was assumed to be 100%; RT-PCR Sp was found to be 94%. The ELISA Se was 76% and 51% at optical density cut-off values ≥ 20% and ≥ 40%, respectively; the Sp was 94% at each cut-off value. The model showed some sensitivity to ELISA prior information, the ELISA Se being approximately 8% lower when informative prior information was specified in the model. When there was no adjustment for dependence between culture and RT-PCR, the posterior estimates for both culture and RT-PCR Se were 11% higher than with the conditional-dependence model and had considerably narrower probability intervals, which suggests that correlation between culture and PCR is important and should be adjusted for in future studies.


Subject(s)
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Bacteriological Techniques , Canada/epidemiology , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
3.
Can J Vet Res ; 74(2): 81-90, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20592836

ABSTRACT

The study objectives were to investigate Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and risk factors for shedding in 10 purposively selected farrow-to-finish farms in Saskatchewan and Alberta. Pooled fecal samples from the breeding and grow-finish phases and individual fecal samples from breeding, nursery, and grow-finish pigs were cultured for Salmonella; serotyping of isolates was performed. Pig and pen characteristics were recorded for each pig and pen sampled.Overall, 407/1143 (36%) of samples were Salmonella positive; within-farm prevalence ranged from 1% to 79%. Sows, nursery, and grow-finish pigs accounted for 43%, 29%, and 28% of positive samples, respectively. More Salmonella were detected in pooled pen than individual pig samples (P < 0.001). Among 418 Salmonella isolates, there were 19 distinct serovars; the most common were S. Derby (28.5%), S. Typhimurium, var. Copenhagen (19.1%), S. Putten (11.8%), S. Infantis (6.8%), and S. Mbandaka (6.1%). Sows were more likely to shed Salmonella than nursery or grow-finisher (OR 2.9, P < 0.001) pigs. Pelleted feed (OR 8.2, P < 0.001) and nose-to-nose pig contact through pens (OR 2.2, P = 0.005) were associated with increased Salmonella prevalence. Significant differences in serovar distribution were detected among production phases. The use of pooled pen samples is recommended as a more efficient means for accurate evaluation of Salmonella status in different phases of pig production. The breeding herd might be an important source of Salmonella persistence within farrow-to-finish farms and should be targeted in control efforts. The latter might also apply to the use of pelleted feed, which remains the most consistently reported significant risk factor for Salmonella shedding in pigs.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Agriculture , Alberta/epidemiology , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Husbandry , Animals , Feces/microbiology , Female , Housing, Animal , Male , Risk Factors , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Saskatchewan/epidemiology , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 6(1): 23-31, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18991537

ABSTRACT

The study objectives were to identify potential associations between reported antimicrobial use (AMU) practices and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of fecal and environmental Salmonella spp. isolates (n = 322 isolates) recovered from 60 Alberta finishing swine farms, and to estimate the amount of pen and farm level variation in AMR. The AMU data were collected through a questionnaire. Separate multilevel logistic regression models were built for six antimicrobials with prevalence of resistance >or=5% using the Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Model (GLLAMM) procedure. In-feed use of tylosin in finishers was associated with increased odds of resistance in Salmonella isolates to ampicillin (OR = 61.56), streptomycin (OR = 11.70), and multiple antimicrobials (OR = 4.90). Injectable penicillin use in growers was associated with decreased odds of resistance in Salmonella isolates to streptomycin (OR = 0.06), kanamycin (OR = 0.03), and multiple antimicrobials (OR = 0.12). Injectable penicillin use in finishers was associated with decreased odds of resistance in Salmonella isolates to ampicillin (OR = 0.007) and chloramphenicol (OR = 0.04). Overall, these results indicate that AMU in pig production is inconsistently associated with AMR in Salmonella from finishing swine. Variation in AMR prevalence of Salmonella isolates of swine was moderate to high at pen and farm levels for most antimicrobials suggesting that interventions at the pen and farm levels might be beneficial in reducing the emergence of AMR Salmonella in swine populations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Salmonella/drug effects , Alberta , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Consumer Product Safety , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Food Microbiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Swine Diseases/microbiology
5.
Prev Vet Med ; 88(3): 185-92, 2009 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19041147

ABSTRACT

Multilevel random intercept logistic and Poisson regression were used to model associations between various antimicrobial use practices and resistance to individual and multiple antimicrobials among generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine. In-feed antimicrobial use in finishers was significantly associated with increased risk of resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, and sulfisoxazole in generic E. coli isolates. Chlortetracycline use in grower rations was associated with ampicillin and tetracycline resistance. Use of in-feed antimicrobials in finishers was significantly associated with increased risk of resistance of generic E. coli to multiple antimicrobials. The study findings suggest that certain farm-level interventions related to antimicrobial use might be beneficial in reducing development and emergence of antimicrobial resistance in swine populations.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Models, Biological , Poisson Distribution , Regression Analysis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control
6.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(3): 217-27, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505184

ABSTRACT

Food safety risks due to Escherichia coli O157:H7 may be affected by variability in prevalence in or on live cattle at slaughter. Our objectives were to assess the prevalence and risk factors associated with E. coli O157:H7 in feedlot pens immediately prior to slaughter, and assess relationships among methods of monitoring the E. coli O157:H7 status of pre-harvest pens. We studied 84 pens containing a total of nearly 27,000 head of cattle in commercial feedlots in Alberta during 2003 and 2004. Sampling devices (ROPES) prepared from manila ropes were used to detect high prevalence pens. Forty of 84 pens (48%) were classified ROPES-positive. Within pens, fecal prevalence ranged between 0% to 80% (median = 20%) and the hide prevalence ranged between 0% and 30% (median = 0%). Pens that were ROPES-positive had a higher median prevalence for feces (40%) and for hides (3.8%) than those that were ROPES-negative (13.3% and 0%, respectively). The prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 in pens immediately prior to slaughter was found to be quite high or very low even within feedlots and seasons. Factors such as sampling month, temperature, precipitation, pen floor conditions, and water tank cleanliness were associated with E. coli O157:H7 outcome measures, although associated factors were not completely consistent among years and outcome measures. Fecal and hide prevalence are considered primary pre-harvest indicators of potential carcass contamination, but other methods such as ROPES that are associated with these outcomes may provide logistic advantages to efficiently classify pens of cattle as high or low risk to food safety.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Consumer Product Safety , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli O157/isolation & purification , Abattoirs , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Reservoirs/veterinary , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/transmission , Feces/microbiology , Humans , Meat/microbiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Skin/microbiology
7.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 82-90, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505196

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to describe antimicrobial resistance patterns in fecal generic Escherichia coli obtained from calves in western Canadian cow-calf herds. Susceptibility testing was completed on 1677 isolates obtained from 480 beef calves in 91 herds in the spring, and from 1187 isolates obtained from 394 calves in 45 herds in the fall of 2002. Resistance was rare to antimicrobials classified as being of very high importance to human health. Isolates were most commonly resistant to tetracycline, sulphamethoxazole, and streptomycin. Resistance to at least one antimicrobial was identified in 48.8% of the isolates collected in the spring, and 7.0% of those collected in the fall. Spring or fall calf resistance status was not associated with calf gender, breed, age of the dam, or if the calf was treated before sample collection. Calves < or = 3 days of age were less likely to be resistance positive than calves > 10 days of age.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Age Factors , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Canada/epidemiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Sex Factors
8.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 91-100, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505197

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to describe antimicrobial resistance in fecal generic Escherichia coli isolated from cows and cow-calf pairs from western Canadian beef herds. Susceptibility testing was completed on 1555 E. coli isolates (n = 533 cows from 69 herds) harvested from fresh fecal samples in the spring of 2002, and 630 isolates (n = 105 cow-calf pairs from 10 herds) collected in the spring of 2003. Only 1 cow isolate was resistant to an antimicrobial classified by Health Canada as being of very high importance to human medicine. Resistance to at least 2 antimicrobials was detected in 7.1% of the 2002 cow isolates, in 3.4% of the 2003 cow isolates, and 23.2% of the 2003 calf isolates. In the cows, resistance to at least 1 antimicrobial was not associated with cow breed (P = 0.16), cow age (P = 0.14), or previous cow treatment (P = 0.56). In the calves, resistance to at least 1 antimicrobial was not predicted by whether or not its dam was resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial (P = 0.36).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Age Factors , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Canada/epidemiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Sex Factors
9.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 137-42, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505202

ABSTRACT

Information regarding antimicrobial use in sheep is scarce. In 2001, a scrapie surveillance program was initiated in Alberta that also provided a mechanism for collecting other sheep health data including antimicrobial use information between April 2001 and April 2002. A major objective of this study was to describe antimicrobial use in the Alberta sheep industry. This was done by obtaining qualitative antimicrobial use information from all flocks (n = 212) providing cull ewes to the program using a brief, primarily flock-level, questionnaire. The respondents' flocks represented 13.6% of the total provincial flock in Alberta in 2001. By a substantial amount, the most frequent method of administering antimicrobials was through injection followed by in-feed, oral (liquids, pills, boluses), and in-water routes, respectively. Drug-specific use data were collected for injectable antimicrobials only, with the most commonly used antimicrobial classes being penicillins followed by tetracyclines. Producers rarely treated some or all of their flock with injectable antimicrobials after discovering an individual sick animal. Adult sheep were the most common age group treated with injectable antimicrobials and the most frequent reason for injectable antimicrobial use was mastitis followed by respiratory problems. This study provides some initial insight regarding antimicrobial use in Alberta sheep flocks. However, collection of more drug-specific data (drug type, dose/concentration, duration of treatment) for noninjectable routes of administration should be conducted in future studies. Assessing antimicrobial use in other sectors of the Alberta sheep industry (feedlots) and other provinces across Canada would also be beneficial.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Mastitis/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/drug therapy , Sheep/growth & development , Age Factors , Alberta , Animal Feed , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/supply & distribution , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Routes/veterinary , Female , Male , Mastitis/drug therapy , Mastitis/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/veterinary , Seasons , Sex Factors , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 151-9, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505204

ABSTRACT

Salmonella spp. (n = 468), isolated from the feces of sows, nursery, and grow-finish pigs in 20 farrow-to-finish herds in Alberta and Saskatchewan, were tested for susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials. No resistance was identified to amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin or nalidixic acid, and less than 1% of the isolates were resistant to cefoxitin and gentamicin. Isolates were most commonly resistant to tetracycline (35%) and sulfamethoxazole (27%). Overall, 59% of the Salmonella were susceptible to all 16 drugs (pansusceptible). Isolates from sows were more likely to be pansusceptible than isolates from nursery or grow-finish pigs. Resistance to 2 or more drugs occurred in 29% of the isolates and was significantly more likely to occur in Salmonella from nursery pigs than from sows. The odds of resistance to 4 of the drugs, streptomycin, ampicillin, kanamycin and cephalothin, were significantly higher in isolates from nursery pigs than grow-finish pigs, while the odds of resistance to 2 drugs, tetracycline and streptomycin, were higher in Salmonella from nursery pigs than from sows. More age-specific risk factor studies are needed to investigate these differences between production phases.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Salmonella/drug effects , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Age Factors , Alberta , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Risk Factors , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Saskatchewan , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology
11.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 160-7, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505205

ABSTRACT

Escherichia coli (n = 1439), isolated from the feces of apparently healthy grow-finish pigs in 20 herds in Alberta and Saskatchewan, were tested for susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, ceftriaxone, and ciprofloxacin and less than 1% was resistant to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, gentamicin, and nalidixic acid. Resistance was most common to tetracycline (66.8%), sulfamethoxazole (46.0%) and streptomycin (33.4%). Twenty-one percent of the isolates were susceptible to all drugs, while 57% were resistant to 2 or more antimicrobials. Unconditional associations between resistances provided insight into the potential for co-selection. Every resistance-outcome was associated with at least 2 other drug-resistances. These associations illustrate the propensity for resistance phenotypes to occur together and the importance of considering co-selection in antimicrobial use decisions. A 2nd analysis explored the associations between resistance phenotypes in E. coli and Salmonella spp. from the same herd. Only 2 resistances in Salmonella were associated with herd-level E. coli resistance, indicating that E. coli is a poor sentinel for Salmonella AMR within herds. Herd-level management, including antimicrobial use, could affect antimicrobial resistance. The intra-class correlation between isolates within herds ranged from 0.1 to 0.46, which confirmed resistance clustered within herds. This suggests herd-level interventions might mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Overall, these results reflect the on-farm selection pressure for resistance and the potential food-safety risk from near-market animals. These data provide a baseline for comparisons with future on-farm monitoring of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Age Factors , Alberta , Animals , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/growth & development , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Risk Factors , Saskatchewan , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology
12.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 175-80, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505207

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in generic Escherichia coli isolates obtained from 90 Alberta finisher swine farms. Up to 5 isolates were obtained from each of 269 pooled fecal samples and were classified as susceptible or resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Of the 1322 isolates, 166 (12.6%) were susceptible to all 15 antimicrobials. No resistance to amikacin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, or ciprofloxacin, antimicrobials of importance in human medicine, was observed. Relatively low frequencies of resistance were observed to gentamicin (1.1%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (0.7%), and cefoxitin (0.7%). Higher frequencies of resistance were observed for tetracycline (78.9%), sulfisoxazole (49.9%), streptomycin (49.6%), ampicillin (30.6%), chloramphenicol (17.6%), kanamycin (10%), and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (6.4%). Among the isolates resistant to > or = 2 antimicrobial classes, 20.8%, 20.6%, 18.2%, 7.0%, 1.8%, 0.2%, and 0.2% were resistant to 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 antimicrobials, respectively. The most common multidrug-resistance patterns (resistance to > or = 2 antimicrobial classes) were streptomycin-tetracycline (9.4%), streptomycin-sulfisoxazole-tetracycline (6.2%), and ampicillin-streptomycin-sulfisoxazole-tetracycline (6.1%). More clustering (higher intra-class correlation coefficients) in antimicrobial resistance was observed for isolates at the same visit than for isolates from different visits in the same farm, indicating that sampling more farms, testing fewer isolates per visits, and taking longer periods between visits may be appropriate and more efficient for a better understanding of potential shifts in resistance over time.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Age Factors , Alberta , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Seasons , Sex Factors , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology
13.
Can J Vet Res ; 72(2): 181-7, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18505208

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to investigate the associations between antimicrobial resistance patterns in generic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. isolates recovered from identical pen pooled fecal samples, and to evaluate potential clustering of multiple isolates of these organisms within identical fecal samples. Up to 5 generic E. coli (n = 922 isolates) and Salmonella spp. (n = 922 isolates) isolates were obtained from each of 188 pen pooled fecal samples that had been collected from 45 finishing swine farms in Alberta in 2000, and tested for susceptibility to 15 antimicrobials. No isolates of either organism were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones, which in Canada are considered antimicrobials of very high importance to human health. Approximately twice as many generic E. coli isolates as Salmonella spp. isolates were resistant to at least 1 antimicrobial. In addition, E. coli isolates showed more multidrug-resistance patterns. No significant association was observed between the resistance phenotypes of Salmonella spp. and E. coli at the fecal sample level. More clustering at the sample level was observed for proportions of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Salmonella spp. isolates than E. coli indicating that in future studies it might be sufficient to test fewer than 5 Salmonella spp. isolates per sample.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli Infections/veterinary , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Age Factors , Alberta , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Cluster Analysis , Colony Count, Microbial/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Female , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Salmonella , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Seasons , Sex Factors , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology
14.
Can J Vet Res ; 71(4): 264-70, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17955900

ABSTRACT

This study investigated potential risk factors for the presence of Salmonella on 89 Alberta swine-finishing farms with the use of a questionnaire. Salmonella status was regressed on each fixed effect in a logistic mixed regression model, with farm as the random effect. Eleven variables were significant at the 10% level: farm type, number of square feet per pen, number of pigs per pen, source of feed, ration type, dust control measures, cat presence, reported effective mouse-control measures, time required to be away from pigs before visiting the farm, precautions taken when entering or leaving the farm, and reported use of antimicrobials through water. Three factors remained significant at the 5% level in the multivariable analysis: farm type, ration type, and precautions taken when entering or leaving the farm. Finishing barns at multisite operations or individual grow-to-finish farms had a greater risk of the presence of Salmonella at a single visit than did finishing barns at farrow-to-finish farms. The use of pelleted and wet feed was associated with higher odds of the presence of Salmonella than was the use of meal feed. Farms that required their personnel or visitors to shower before entering and before leaving had increased odds of the presence of Salmonella compared with farms that provided boots and coveralls; no significant difference was observed between the latter category and farms that used boot disinfection. Further work is necessary to better understand the effectiveness of all-in/all-out pig management and disinfection practices in reducing the presence of Salmonella in swine and to evaluate the association with certain types of feed.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Animal Husbandry/methods , Hygiene , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Humans , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections, Animal/etiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine Diseases/etiology , Swine Diseases/transmission
15.
Vet Microbiol ; 105(1): 47-56, 2005 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15607083

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the farm prevalence of Salmonella in 90 Alberta finishing swine farms over a 5-month period, to evaluate Salmonella distribution in the farm environment and to describe Salmonella serovar diversity on these farms. Ten veterinary practitioners selected 90 Alberta swine farms based on an annual production of > or =2000 market pigs per farm and the willingness of the producers to participate in the study. Between May and September 2000, twenty samples were collected from finishing swine and the environment of each farm. The annual production of selected farms represented approximately 25% of the market swine production in Alberta. Participating farms were geographically representative of major swine production areas in Alberta. Sixty (66.7%) farms had at least one Salmonella-positive sample, with confidence interval (CI) of 57.1-77.2%. Salmonella were detected in 14.3% of fecal and 20.1% of environmental samples. The number of Salmonella-positive samples per farm ranged from 1 to 19. Among environmental samples, Salmonella were most frequently recovered from boots (38.6%) and the main drain (31.8%). Twenty-two serovars were detected on the 60 Salmonella-positive farms. Serovars Typhimurium (78 isolates), Derby (71 isolates) and Infantis (47 isolates) were the most common. A single serovar was detected on 58 farms, while 2, 3 and >3 serovars were detected on 15, 10 and 7 farms, respectively. The Salmonella farm status changed frequently over the 5-month period indicating the dynamic nature of Salmonella infections on these farms.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella/growth & development , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Bacteriophage Typing , Feces/microbiology , Longitudinal Studies , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Serotyping , Swine
16.
Vet Microbiol ; 104(3-4): 189-96, 2004 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15564027

ABSTRACT

The study objective was to describe and evaluate antimicrobial resistance profiles in Salmonella isolated from Alberta swine finishing farms. Salmonella isolates (n = 322) were obtained from 192 fecal and 84 environmental samples of the 60 Salmonella-positive swine finishing farms. Isolates were classified susceptible, intermediate or resistant based on NCCLS guidelines. More than half of the isolates (53.4%) were susceptible to all of the 18 antimicrobials in the testing panel. No resistance was observed to amikacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ceftiofur, ceftriaxone, cephalothin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem or nalidixic acid. Less than 1% of isolates were resistant to apramycin, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Higher frequencies of resistance were observed for chloramphenicol (4.7%), ampicillin (7.8%), kanamycin (11.8%), sulfamethoxazole (21.1%), streptomycin (25.5%) and tetracycline (38.8%). Eleven Salmonella serovars had isolates with resistance to > or =3 antimicrobials. The most frequently resistant serovar was Salmonella Derby, with 27 (38.0%) isolates resistant to > or =3 antimicrobials, including resistance to five and six antimicrobials. An absence of resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquniolones and a low proportion of isolates resistant to amikacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, apramycin, gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole are encouraging findings from public health and animal health perspectives. Frequent resistance observed for ampicillin, kanamycin, sulfamethoxazole, streptomycin and tetracycline, antimicrobials commonly used in veterinary medicine for decades, indicates an urgent need to utilize these antimicrobials more prudently if their benefits are to be preserved.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Salmonella Infections, Animal/drug therapy , Salmonella/drug effects , Swine Diseases/drug therapy , Alberta , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Feces/microbiology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/growth & development , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Swine , Swine Diseases/microbiology
17.
Can Vet J ; 44(3): 230-1, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12677693

ABSTRACT

Fifty dairy herds in Alberta were tested for the presence of Salmonella. Four (8%) dairy herds had at least 1 cow shedding Salmonella. Different isolates were identified by serotyping, phage typing, and antibiotic resistance patterns. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns were determined for unique isolates.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella/classification , Alberta/epidemiology , Animals , Bacteriophage Typing/veterinary , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field/veterinary , Female , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Phylogeny , Prevalence , Salmonella/drug effects , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Serotyping/veterinary
18.
Can Vet J ; 43(6): 443-53, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12058570

ABSTRACT

The overall purpose of this study was to provide information on animal and occupational health associated with the infection of a diary herd with Salmonella Muenster that would be useful in the management of dairy herds so infected. This retrospective, longitudinal report records a 2-year infection of a 140-cow dairy herd with S. Muenster, which was likely introduced by additions to the herd. Six cows aborted or had diarrhea due to salmonellosis in the last trimester of pregnancy. Additions to the herd and the presence of animals that had not received an Escherichia coli bacterin-toxoid were risk factors for salmonellosis. One neonate died, and 24 of 36 calves born between November 1998 and May 1999 had diarrhea by 1 mo of age. Initially, over 60% of the cows were fecal positive; within 6 months, all cows but I had become infected. The intermittent shedding of the organism and the eventual zero prevalence highlight the inappropriateness of extensive culling as an eradication strategy. Cultures of the bulk-tank milk filters were more sensitive than cultures of the bulk-tank milk samples at detecting S. Muenster. Two months after the index case, S. Muenster was cultured from the milk of 7.8% of the cows. Positive fecal or milk cultures were not associated with impaired health or production. The herd's milk was a zoonotic risk, but contact with infected animals was not. The organism spread easily between operations, likely via manure-contaminated clothing and footwear.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/veterinary , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Abortion, Veterinary/etiology , Abortion, Veterinary/microbiology , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Cattle Diseases/transmission , DNA Fingerprinting/veterinary , Diarrhea/etiology , Diarrhea/veterinary , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Milk/microbiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/genetics , Salmonella Infections, Animal/complications , Salmonella Infections, Animal/transmission , Seasons , Serotyping/veterinary , Zoonoses
19.
J Food Prot ; 65(3): 484-91, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11899047

ABSTRACT

Breeder cows, cattle recently arrived at feedlots, and cattle about to be shipped for slaughter were tested for Salmonella spp. No Salmonella spp. were detected in fecal samples from breeding cows. Nineteen of 1,000 (1.9%) fecal samples from recently arrived feedlot cattle were positive for Salmonella spp. compared to only 2 of 1,000 (0.2%) fecal samples taken within 2 weeks of slaughter. The positive fecal samples were collected in 5 of 50 (10%) "recent arrival" pens tested and in 1 of 50 (2%) pens tested within 2 weeks of slaughter. The serotypes isolated were Salmonella Agona, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhimurium DT104, and Salmonella 4,5,12:i:-. Ground beef samples purchased from retail outlets throughout Alberta were processed for Salmonella spp. Thirteen of 1,002 (1.3%) samples were positive for Salmonella spp. The serotypes isolated from ground beef were Salmonella Anatum, Salmonella Heidelberg, Salmonella Montevideo, Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Typhimurium var. Copenhagen, and Salmonella Rough-O:i:1,2. The antibiotic resistance and pulsed-field electrophoresis gel macrorestriction patterns of all isolates were compared.


Subject(s)
Cattle/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Meat Products/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Alberta , Animals , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Salmonella/classification , Salmonella/genetics , Serotyping
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...