The Relationship Between Restrictive Regulation of Midwives, Practice Environment, and Professional Burnout: A 7-State Mixed-Methods Comparison of Autonomous and Restrictive State Regulation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between state regulation of the midwifery workforce, practice environment, and burnout. BACKGROUND: Burnout threatens the US midwifery workforce, with over 40% of certified nurse-midwives meeting criteria. Burnout can lead to poorer physical and mental health and withdrawal from the workforce. Burnout in midwives has been associated with lack of control and autonomy. In the United States, midwives' autonomy is restricted through state-level regulation that limits scope of practice and professional independence. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an explanatory sequential approach. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected by online surveys and analyzed in a 2-stage process, followed by data integration. RESULTS: State regulation was not found to be independently associated with burnout (n = 248; P = .250); however, mediation analysis showed a significant association between state regulation, practice environment, and burnout. Qualitative analysis mirrored the importance of practice environment and expanded on its features. CONCLUSION: For midwives, unrestrictive practice regulation may not translate to burnout prevention without supportive practice environments. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Interventions should focus on promoting job flexibility, realistic demands, and professional values. While midwives' commitment to patients and the profession can help bolster the workforce, it can also amplify negative experiences of the practice environment.

A qualitative meta-synthesis of women's experiences of labor dystocia.

PROBLEM: Researchers have prioritized understanding and differentiating the pathophysiologic mechanisms to improve precision in diagnosis and individualization of care, however the experiences of women with labor dystocia have been underexamined. BACKGROUND: Management of labor dystocia has been identified as an opportunity for reducing the rate of unnecessary cesarean births and the associated risks to women and their infants. This meta-synthesis explores women's experiences of labor dystocia to enrich the discussion of care practices and contextualize discussions of shared decision making in what is most meaningful to women. QUESTIONS: How does prolonged labor influence women's experience of birth and motherhood? What are women's experiences with decision-making about labor augmentation during prolonged labor? METHODS: Sandelowski and Barroso's meta-synthesis approach was used to analyze primary qualitative studies of women's experiences of labor dystocia. Through inductive thematic synthesis and reciprocal translation, themes identified in qualitative research, quotations, and coded meaning units were aggregated and interpreted into derived categories and themes. FINDINGS: Fourteen qualitative studies were analyzed. Women experienced labor dystocia as a transition from healthy labor to abnormal labor requiring medical support consistent with Transition Theory by Meleis. Six new categories and thirty themes were identified. Each category and theme reflects a distinct component of the experience of labor dystocia. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the way women experience labor dystocia. Facilitation of the transition from healthy labor to labor dystocia can be supported by a fluid, adaptable method of caring for women in the face of uncertainty and loss of choice.

Examining nurse/patient relationships in care coordination: A qualitative metasynthesis.

BACKGROUND: The combination of education, experience, skill mix, and frequency of nursing care provided has not been broadly studied from a systems theory perspective, in the care coordination process, or within transitions of care. PURPOSE: To examine nurse/patient relationships (as a proxy for nurse dose) in the care coordination experience through a qualitative metasynthesis using a systems theory approach. DESIGN: The study was a qualitative metasynthesis with four sequential processes; (1) a systematic literature search to answer the structured research question, (2) formal quality appraisal and data immersion, (3) interpretive synthesis of the data within and across studies, and (4) re-situating the derived themes through reciprocal translation to each of the primary studies. CINHAL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed were searched, and 159 articles retrieved. Eight articles remained after inclusion/exclusion criteria and quality review criteria were applied. RESULTS: Key themes were organized using a systems theory perspective (Structure, Process and Outcomes). The need for a coordinated nurse-patient relationship and the ability of the nurse to calm the complexity that occurs forms the structure of the relationship. The process includes having an awareness of challenges of the coordinated nurse-patient relationship and the transitions that occur, nurses going above and beyond, providing meaningful communication, and navigating system complexity. The outcomes are the value of a coordinated nurse-patient relationship and managing the illness/wellness journey. CONCLUSIONS: The information from this metasynthesis provides an integrated view for nursing leaders and insight into factors that promote an effective and coordinated nurse-patient relationship.