ABSTRACT
There is currently an imbalance between the need for cadaveric kidneys for transplantation and the supply. The medical criteria for accepting cadaveric donors are changing and organs that were originally thought to be unacceptable have functioned well. Previous reports have discussed the problems with transplanting pediatric allografts less than 4 years old into adult recipients, and the results have not been encouraging. From 1986 to 1991 a total of 50 kidneys ages 11 to 48 months were transplanted as single units into adult recipients (Group A). Ninety-one adult donor cadaveric transplants were used as controls (Group B). The cadaveric transplants were 2nd or 3rd transplants in 7 of the Group A and 12 of the Group B patients. Renal preservation, storage times, and demographics were the same. Prednisone, cyclosporine, and either Minnesota ALG or OKT3 were used for immunosuppression in both groups. Imuran was added in immunologically high-risk patients. The 1-year actuarial patient and allograft survivals for Group A versus Group B were 89.5% versus 94.2% (p=0.49) and 71.3% versus 87.8% (p=0.01), respectively. There was no difference in allograft or patient survival in kidneys from donors 11-24 months of age or 25-48 months (p=0.56). Renal growth, as measured by sonography, occurred while on cyclosporine A. Excretory and hormonal function as measured by creatinine and hematocrit both improved. Seventy percent of the Group A patients and 76% of the Group B patients were free from rejection in the first 2 months post transplantation (p=0.45).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft Survival , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Infant , Kidney/growth & development , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Preservation , Survival Rate , Tissue and Organ ProcurementABSTRACT
A total of 93 recipients of either HLA-identical (34) or 1-haplotype matched (59) living related donor renal transplants was assigned prospectively into immunosuppressive treatment groups on the basis of transfusion histories obtained at the initial evaluation for transplantation. Patients who received 0 to 2 third party transfusions were given no further transfusion, and received cyclosporine and prednisone immunosuppression after transplantation (cyclosporine group). Patients who received 3 or 4 third party transfusions were given additional transfusions until 5 had been received, and were managed with azathioprine and prednisone after transplantation (azathioprine group). Patients who already received 5 or more third party transfusions had no additional transfusions and were assigned to the azathioprine group. No patient had a positive crossmatch to the potential donor after initial evaluation and confirmation of a negative crossmatch. The number of rejection episodes per patient after transplantation was significantly higher in the azathioprine group for HLA-identical (p equals 0.001) and 1-haplotype (p equals 0.003) recipients. One-year patient survival rats for the HLA-identical cyclosporine and azathioprine groups were 100 and 94 per cent, respectively, with respective 1-year allograft survivals of 100 and 89 per cent in the 2 groups. In the 1-haplotype group 1-year patient survival rates were 95 and 94 per cent for the cyclosporine and azathioprine groups, respectively; allograft survival was 81 per cent for the cyclosporine group and 91 per cent for the azathioprine group. None of the observed differences in graft or patient survival between the 2 groups was statistically significant. Deliberate third party transfusions with conventional immunosuppression and cyclosporine immunosuppression are effective methods to treat recipients of living related donor renal transplants.
