The Medial Gastrocnemius Recession, an Alternative Surgical Treatment for Isolated Gastrocnemius Contracture: A Cadaver Study With Discussion Emphasizing Variable Conjoint Tendon Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrocnemius recession is a popular procedure utilized to treat chronic conditions related to isolated gastrocnemius contracture (IGC). Recent anatomical research detailing variable gastrocsoleus tendon morphology has raised important questions regarding the safety of some traditional recession procedures. Alternative gastrocnemius recession strategies may produce comparable dorsiflexion improvement results while avoiding the surgical risk related to conjoint tendon anatomical variability. METHODS: Ten matched cadaver pairs were randomized to receive either a medial gastrocnemius recession (MGR) procedure or a gastrocnemius intramuscular recession "Baumann" procedure. Postoperative dorsiflexion improvement was measured and then compared between groups. Detailed postoperative surgical dissections were performed to assess structures at risk, conjoint tendon morphology, and anatomical symmetry. RESULTS: Medial gastrocnemius recession and Baumann procedures were equally effective at producing significant increases in passive ankle dorsiflexion. No sural nerve injuries were observed. Thirty-five percent of specimens showed direct muscular fusion of at least a portion of the distal gastrocnemius muscular tissue to the adjacent soleus. CONCLUSION: The MGR procedure produced comparable dorsiflexion improvement results to the Baumann procedure in our cadaver model. Surgeons must account for certain conjoint tendon anatomical variants when surgically treating IGC as traditional recession methods risk tendo-Achilles overlengthening. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Cadaver Study.

Structures at Risk During Percutaneous Extra-Articular Chevron Osteotomy of the Distal First Metatarsal.

Background. Minimally invasive surgery of the forefoot has regained popularity as an alternative to traditional open procedures. Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery has been shown to be effective and reproducible for the treatment of mild to moderate hallux valgus. The aim of this study is to identify vital structures that are at risk for iatrogenic damage while performing a minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy due to limited direct visualization. Methods. Ten fresh-frozen below knee cadavers were used for this study. A minimally invasive distal chevron osteotomy and medial eminence resection with a 2.2 mm × 22 mm Shannon burr was performed on each cadaver. Each specimen was dissected to expose the potential structures at risk for injury during the procedure. Structures evaluated included the medial neurovascular bundle, first metatarsophalangeal joint capsule, extensor hallucis longus tendon, flexor hallucis longus tendon, abductor hallucis tendon, and the sesamoid apparatus. Results. Ten specimens were evaluated. The dorsal medial cutaneous nerve was directly injured in 5 of the 10 cadaver specimens and intact/uninjured in the remaining 5 specimens. The flexor hallucis longus, extensor hallucis longus, adductor tendon, sesamoid apparatus, and first metatarsophalangeal joint capsule were uninjured in all specimens. Conclusion. Minimally invasive chevron distal osteotomy and medial eminence resection has a high learning curve. The resection of the medial eminence may iatrogenically injure the dorsal medial cutaneous nerve. The incidence is higher in this study than prior reported cadaveric studies and may warrant extra care to protect vital structures.Level of Evidence: Level IV: Cadaver study.

Structures at Risk From an Intermetatarsal Screw for Lapidus Bunionectomy: A Cadaveric Study.

The Lapidus bunionectomy is performed to treat hallux valgus. Recurrence of the deformity remains a concern. A transverse intermetatarsal screw spanning the base of the first metatarsal to the base of the second can increase stability. The neurovascular bundle is located within the proximity of this screw. In this study, we assessed the structures at risks with the use of this technique. In 10 specimens, a guide wire was placed, and a 4.0-mm cannulated screw was inserted. The neurovascular bundle was dissected and inspected for direct trauma to the neurovascular bundle, and the proximity of the screw was measured using a digital caliper. Ten cadaveric specimens were used. The dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve were free from injury in 9 of 10 specimens. In those 9 specimens, the neurovascular bundle was located dorsal in relation to the screw. The mean distance of the screw to the neurovascular bundle was 7.1 ± 3.3 mm. The mean distance from the screw to the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ) was 14.7 ± 4.3 mm. The mean distance from the screw as it entered the second metatarsal to the second TMTJ was 18.0 ± 7.2 mm. In 1 specimen, the screw was found to be traversing through the neurovascular bundle. The distance from the screw to the first TMTJ was 15.0 mm. The distance of the screw from where it entered the second metatarsal to the second TMTJ was 24.0 mm. Although the intermetatarsal screw avoided the neurovascular cases in most instances, there is some anatomic risk to the neurovascular bundle. Further study is warranted to evaluate clinical results using the intermetatarsal screw for the modified Lapidus procedure.