Proportion of trips made by walking: estimating a state-level baseline for Healthy People 2010 Objective 22-14.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the proportion of short trips made by walking among Michigan adults and barriers to walking for transportation. METHODS: Four questions on walking for transportation were asked of 3808 respondents to the Michigan Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) between January and December 2001. RESULTS: Three quarters (74.3%) of Michigan adults were estimated to have made at least one short trip (.25-1 mile) in the previous week; however, only 36.2% of them walked even one of these trips. The mean proportion of short trips walked was 21.4%; less than 10% of all respondents walked five or more trips per week. DISCUSSION: Our results provide a Michigan-specific baseline for Healthy People 2010 Objective 22-14 (i.e., increase the proportion of trips made by walking) and suggest the potential for these questions to be used to monitor active transportation via the BRFSS.

Physical activity patterns among walkers and compliance with public health recommendations.

PURPOSE: Walking is the most common leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) among U.S. adults. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence of walking for physical activity and the proportion of walkers who met current public health physical activity recommendations. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 1998 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a collection of state-based, random-digit-dialed telephone surveys of adults. Physical activity measures included the type, frequency, and duration of the two LTPAs in which respondents engaged most often during the previous month. We calculated the prevalence of walking and the prevalence of three physical activity patterns defined by combinations of walking duration and frequency. We also examined the effect on these patterns of participating in a second LTPA. RESULTS: In 1998, an estimated 38.6% of U.S. adults walked for physical activity. Among walkers, 21.3% walked a minimum of 30 min five or more times per week. This approximates compliance with current physical activity recommendations. Compliance increased to 34.5% when the criteria were relaxed to include at least 150 min of walking per week accumulated over three or more occasions. Relaxing the criteria further to include a minimum of 150 min.wk(-1) regardless of frequency produced only a small increase in compliance (37.6%). However, compliance with each of these three activity patterns approximately doubled when a second LTPA was taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: Less than 40% of walkers complied through walking with even our most liberal physical activity pattern (> or =150 min.wk(-1) regardless of frequency). For walkers to meet current public health recommendations, many need to walk more frequently and/or to engage in additional physical activities.

A healthy diet indicator: quantifying compliance with the dietary guidelines using the BRFSS.

BACKGROUND: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) monitors population prevalence of risk factors related to chronic disease through annual telephone surveys. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the BRFSS to estimate an indicator of overall diet quality among adults. METHODS: The authors developed a brief set of dietary questions that were included in the 1997 Michigan BRFSS. Responses to these questions were analyzed to calculate the Michigan healthy diet indicator (MI-HDI), which was modeled after the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Healthy Eating Index. RESULTS: Among 2,532 respondents, the mean MI-HDI was 55.7 points (maximum score = 100). The mean MI-HDI decreased consistently with declining self-rated eating habits, from 61.5 among those with excellent eating habits to 45.2 among those with poor habits. Diet quality, as measured by the MI-HDI, was higher among women than men and improved with age, education, and factors related to certain interactions with health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: A BRFSS-based indicator can be a feasible and valuable tool for evaluating diet quality among adults using an established state-level surveillance system.