Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
2.
Bull Am Coll Surg ; 102(7): 85-6, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28885799
3.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 40(4): 399-404, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25599316

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe contemporary patterns of and factors associated with adjuvant therapy use and survival outcome after resection of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) using a large contemporary clinical database. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Data Base to identify localized GIST cases diagnosed from 2004 to 2011, and used descriptive and logistic regression analyses to determine patterns of and factors associated with adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazard model were utilized to generate survival probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Of 4694 patients, 73.5% received surgery alone, and 26.5% received adjuvant therapy during 2004 to 2011. Receipt of adjuvant therapy more than doubled between 2006 (13.2%) and 2007 (30.5%), peaked to 37.9% in 2009, and then decreased to 25.6% in 2011 (P for trend<0.0001). Receipt of adjuvant therapy monotonically decreased with older age (P for trend<0.0001), and was higher in patients with larger tumor size (>10 cm) than those with smaller tumor size (≤5 cm) (44.1% vs. 15.8%; P<0.0001). Patients who received adjuvant therapy had 46% lower risk of death than those who received surgery alone (HR=0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.79; P<0.001); survival benefit was statistically significant for GISTs with >10 cm tumor size (HR=0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.89; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In a large nationwide dataset, we showed that the use of adjuvant therapy for localized GISTs has significantly increased over time and patients treated with adjuvant therapy have better survival than patients treated with surgery alone.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/mortality , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/pathology , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Cancer ; 117(24): 5579-88, 2011 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22535500

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Combined transperineal prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is widely used for treatment of prostate cancer. Long-term efficacy and toxicity results of a multicenter phase 2 trial assessing combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for intermediate-risk prostate cancer are presented. METHODS: Intermediate-risk patients per Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center/National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria received 6 months of ADT, and 45 grays (Gy) EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles, followed by transperineal prostate brachytherapy with I125 (100 Gy) or Pd103 (90 Gy). Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation morbidity scoring systems. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as time from enrollment to progression (biochemical, local, distant, or prostate cancer death). In addition to the protocol definition of biochemical failure (3 consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises>1.0 ng/mL after 18 months from treatment start), the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) consensus and Phoenix definitions were also assessed in defining DFS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival. RESULTS: Sixty-one of 63 enrolled patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 73 months. Late grade 2 and 3 toxicity, excluding sexual dysfunction, occurred in 20% and 3% of patients. Six-year DFS applying the protocol definition, 1997 ASTRO consensus, and Phoenix definitions was 87.1%, 75.1%, and 84.9%. Six deaths occurred; only 1 was attributed to prostate cancer. Six-year overall survival was 96.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In a cooperative setting, combination of EBRT and transperineal prostate brachytherapy boost plus ADT resulted in excellent DFS with acceptable late toxicity for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Radiotherapy/methods
14.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 72(3): 814-9, 2008 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18407435

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPPB) can be used with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to provide a high-dose conformal boost to the prostate. The results of a multicenter Phase II trial assessing safety of combination of EBRT and TPPB boost with androgen suppression (AST) in treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer are present here. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Six months of AST was administered. EBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles was administered to 45Gy followed by TPPB using either (125)I or (103)Pd to deliver an additional 100Gy or 90Gy. Toxicity was graded using the National Cancer Institute CTC version 2 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late radiation morbidity scoring systems. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 38 months. Side effects of AST including sexual dysfunction and vasomotor symptoms were commonly observed. Apart from erectile dysfunction, short-term Grade 2 and 3 toxicity was noted in 21% and 7%, primarily genitourinary related. Long-term Grade 2 and 3 toxicities were noted in 13% and 3%. Two patients had Grade 3 dysuria that resolved with longer follow-up. The most common Grade 2 long-term toxicity was urinary frequency (5%). No biochemical or clinical evidence of progression was noted for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In a cooperative group setting, combination EBRT and TPPB boost with 6 months of AST was generally well tolerated with expected genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities. Further follow-up will be required to fully assess long-term toxicity and cancer control.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Androgens/radiation effects , Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Iodine Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Palladium/adverse effects , Palladium/therapeutic use , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries/classification , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radioisotopes/adverse effects , Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Seminal Vesicles/radiation effects
16.
Ann Surg ; 241(6): 929-38; discussion 938-40, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15912042

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We will review the contribution to the Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS) by the techniques of intensity of work per unit of time (IWPUT), the building block methodology (BBM), and the work accomplished by the American College of Surgeons General Surgery Coding & Reimbursement Committee (GSCRC) in using IWPUT/BBM to detect undervalued surgical procedures and recommend payment increases. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The MFS has had a major impact on surgeons' income since its introduction in 1992 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) and additionally has been adopted for use by many commercial insurers. A major component of MFS is physician work, measured as the relative value of work (RVW), which has 2 components: time and intensity. These components are incorporated by: RVW = time x intensity. METHODS: This work formula can be rearranged to give the IWPUT, which has become a powerful tool to calculate the amount of RVW performed by physicians. Most procedures are valued by the total RVW in the global surgical package, which includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative care for a time after surgery. Summing these perioperative components into RVW is called the building block methodology (BBM). RESULTS: Using these techniques, the GSCRC increased the values for 314 surgery procedures during a recent CMS 5-year review, resulting in an increase to general surgeons of roughly 76 million dollars annually. CONCLUSIONS: The use of IWPUT/BBM has been instrumental to correct payment for undervalued surgical procedures. They are powerful methods to measure RVW across specialties and to solve reimbursement, compensation, and practice management problems facing surgeons.


Subject(s)
Fee Schedules , General Surgery/economics , Medicare Part B/economics , Relative Value Scales , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humans , Physicians/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms , United States
18.
Bull Am Coll Surg ; 87(1): 59, 2002 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17390433
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...