Simple bedside additive tool for prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: Risk-adjustment models for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) mortality have been recently reported, but application in bedside prediction of prognosis for individual patients remains untested. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 1, 1997 and September 30, 1999, 10 796 consecutive procedures were performed in a consortium of 8 hospitals. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were identified by use of multivariate logistic regression analysis. The final model was validated by use of the bootstrap technique. Additional validation was performed on an independent data set of 5863 consecutive procedures performed between October 1, 1999, and August 30, 2000. An additive risk-prediction score was developed by rounding coefficients of the logistic regression model to the closest half-integer, and a visual bedside tool for the prediction of individual patient prognosis was developed. In this patient population, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.6%. Multivariate regression analysis identified acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, history of cardiac arrest, renal insufficiency, low ejection fraction, peripheral vascular disease, lesion characteristics, female sex, and advanced age as independent predictors of death. The model had excellent discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90) and was accurate for prediction of mortality among different subgroups. Near-perfect correlation existed between calculated scores and observed mortality, with higher scores associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate predictions of individual patient risk of mortality associated with PCI can be achieved with a simple bedside tool. These predictions could be used during discussions of prognosis before and after PCI.

Successful redeployment of an unexpanded coronary stent.

We report on treatment of a patient in whom failure to deploy the distal portion of a Palmaz-Schatz stent occurred but was not recognized. After an unstable course, the patient underwent repeat coronary angiography, at which time the stent was rewired and redilated. Full deployment of the stent with restoration of TIMI grade 3 flow was achieved. The putative cause of the problem, incomplete deployment of the stent because of inadvertent advancement of the stent delivery sheath, should be avoided, and needs to be recognized if it occurs. Crossing and redilating the stent is possible, although technically difficult.

Coronary embolism complicating aortic valve endocarditis: treatment with placement of an intracoronary stent.

A 37-year-old man, who had received 3 weeks of antimicrobial therapy for aortic value endocarditis, presented with an acute anteroseptal wall myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography demonstrated occlusion of the mid left anterior descending artery, thought to have been caused by embolization of a sterile vegetation. Following failure of balloon dilation to achieve vessel patency, this was achieved by placement of an intracoronary stent.

Retrospective comparative study of primary intracoronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Balloon angioplasty has been shown to be an effective therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction but is associated with a high restenosis rate, substantial early recoil, persistent thrombus and need for intracoronary thrombolysis, and a high rate of reclosure. Because many of the limitations of balloon angioplasty in the noninfarction setting are addressed by intracoronary stenting, we examined the results of primary stenting of 18 consecutive patients treated for acute myocardial infarction, and compared the results to those achieved with primary balloon angioplasty in 18 prior cases. Despite the presence of thrombus prior to angioplasty in 13 of the stented patients, no intracoronary thrombolytic therapy was required. Mean percent stenosis using quantitative coronary angiography was 17.7 +/- 10.2% after primary stenting compared with 43.7 +/- 20.3% after primary balloon angioplasty (P < .001). One stent patient who had all anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy withdrawn early suffered subacute thrombosis. Patients were followed up to 3 yr. Complications were similar in two groups. We conclude that primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction results in superior angiographic appearance as well as resolution of thrombus without the need for routine thrombolysis, and is associated with a low complication rate and excellent short-term clinical patency.