A comparison of open and laparoscopic approaches to adrenalectomy in patients with phaeochromocytoma.

We compared the perioperative profiles of patients undergoing unilateral phaeochromocytoma resection performed by open adrenalectomy with those performed by laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Data was collected prospectively on 24 patients (12 open, 12 laparoscopic). All patients underwent extensive preoperative medical preparation with phenoxybenzamine and beta-blockers. The final preoperative dose of phenoxybenzamine was similar in each group (laparoscopic 119+/-60 mg/day, open 100+/-25 mg/day). Intraoperative haemodynamic instability was assessed by the requirement for therapeutic intervention. More haemodynamic instability was observed in the laparoscopic group but the differences were not statistically significant. Sodium nitroprusside use to treat hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mmHg) was more frequent and the duration of the infusions longer in the laparoscopic group; high dose beta-blocker therapy with atenolol and/or esmolol to treat intraoperative tachycardia (heart rate >90) was also more frequent in the laparoscopic group. The small sample size of the study limited the ability to detect a true difference. Blood loss was greater in the open adrenalectomy group but the difference was not significant. The operating time was significantly longer (236+/-78 vs 147+/-47 min, P<0.01) but the duration of postoperative hospitalization was significantly shorter (5+/-2 vs 11+/-4 days, P<0.01) in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative complications were not significantly different. There were no perioperative deaths. Overall, we observed more haemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection but were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. In our experience, laparoscopic adrenalectomy has the advantage of a shorter time to discharge from hospital.

The use of a questionnaire and simple exercise test in the preoperative assessment of vascular surgery patients.

We aimed to assess the reliability of patients as historians in terms of the self assessment of functional capacity and also examined the usefulness of a simple ward exercise tolerance test. One hundred consecutive elective vascular surgery patients were interviewed preoperatively using a modified Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire. To test reliability in reference to an independent observer, the questionnaire concerning the patient was also applied to each patient's closest relative who was blinded to the patient's responses. Patients were then asked to walk up two flights of stairs and the time taken to complete the task or the reason for failing to complete the task was recorded. The D

A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Sixty-six patients undergoing upper limb surgery were enrolled in a double-blind, randomized, multicentre trial. Five patients were subsequently excluded for various reasons. Of the remaining patients, 30 received 40 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 31 received 40 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine. Brachial plexus block was performed by the axillary approach using a standardized technique with a peripheral nerve stimulator. Parameters investigated included the frequency, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the quality of anaesthesia and the occurrence of any adverse events. The six principal nerves of the brachial plexus were studied individually. The frequency for achieving anaesthesia per nerve ranged from 70 to 90% in the ropivacaine group and 81 to 87% in the bupivacaine group. The median onset time for anaesthesia was 10 to 20 minutes with ropivacaine and 10 to 30 minutes with bupivacaine, and the median duration was 5.3 to 8.7h with ropivacaine and 6.9 to 20.3h with bupivacaine. Motor block was evaluated at the elbow, wrist and hand, and was completely achieved at a rate of 60 to 73% in the ropivacaine group and 55 to 71% in the bupivacaine group. The median duration of motor block was 6.5 to 7.5h with ropivacaine and 6.0 to 9.0h with bupivacaine. These parameters were not statistically different. The duration of partial motor block at the wrist (6.8 v 16.4h) and hand (6.7 v 12.3h) was significantly longer with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% appeared equally efficacious as long-acting local anaesthetics for axillary brachial plexus block.

Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in lumbar epidural anaesthesia for lower limb orthopaedic surgery.

The purpose of this study was to compare the epidural use of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery. In a double-blind, randomized, multi-centre study involving 67 patients, thirty-two patients received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 35 patients received 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at the L2,3 or L3,4 interspace. Parameters measured were the onset time, duration and spread of sensory block, the onset time, duration and degree of motor block, the quality of anaesthesia and the heart rate and blood pressure profile during block onset. Four patients (3 ropivacaine, 1 bupivacaine) were excluded from the study due to technical failure of the block. The onset and duration of analgesia at the T10 dermatome (median, interquartile range) was 10 (5-15) minutes and 3.5 (2.7-4.3) hours respectively for ropivacaine, and was 10 (6-15) minutes and 3.4 (2.5-3.8) hours respectively for bupivacaine. Maximum block height (median, range) was T6 (T2-T12) for ropivacaine and T6 (C7-T10) for bupivacaine. Nine patients receiving ropivacaine and eight patients receiving bupivacaine developed no apparent motor block. The incidence of complete motor block (Bromage grade 3) was low in both groups, being 4/27 for ropivacaine and 6/34 for bupivacaine. In the ropivacaine group, motor and sensory block were judged to be satisfactory in 78% of patients. In the bupivacaine group, motor and sensory block were judged to be satisfactory in 71% and 62% of patients respectively. Cardiovascular changes were similar in both groups. No statistical differences were found between the two groups regarding any of the study parameters.

Comparative effects of plain and epinephrine-containing bupivacaine on the hemodynamic response to cervical plexus anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to investigate whether the addition of epinephrine as a vasoconstrictor additive to local anesthetic affects the hemodynamic profile after cervical plexus block in patients presenting for carotid endarterectomy. DESIGN: A prospective, double-blind, randomized trial. SETTING: A university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Forty patients scheduled for carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia (cervical plexus block). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to one of two groups. Group P (20 patients) received plain bupivacaine; group E (20 patients) received bupivacaine with epinephrine, 5 micrograms/mL. All patients received 2 mg/kg of bupivacaine, and group E received 2 micrograms/kg of epinephrine. The electrocardiogram and intra-arterial blood pressure were monitored continuously, and recordings of heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at predetermined intervals from before the block until the skin incision. RESULTS: After the block, group E developed a sustained increase in heart rate of approximately 15% (p < 0.01), whereas group P showed no change. Systolic blood pressure increased significantly with time over the study period in both groups (p < 0.01). Diastolic blood pressure increased significantly in group P (p < 0.01) but not in group E. CONCLUSIONS: Concerning cervical plexus block with bupivacaine, the use of epinephrine is associated with an increase in heart rate consistent with a beta-adrenergic effect from systemic absorption of the epinephrine. An increase in systolic blood pressure independent of the use of epinephrine also occurs, but epinephrine appears to mitigate against an increase in diastolic blood pressure.

The Sprotte needle and post dural puncture headache following caesarean section.

One hundred and forty-four patients receiving subarachnoid anaesthesia for caesarean section were prospectively analysed for quality of anaesthesia and the occurrence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH). Anaesthesia was administered via 24 gauge Sprotte (n = 104) and 26 gauge Quincke (n = 40) needles using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with morphine 0.2 mg. Anaesthesia was successful in 103 patients with the Sprotte needle and 38 patients with the Quincke needle, and the operating conditions were considered to be excellent. Of the 104 patients in the Sprotte needle group there were ten with PDPH (9.6%), two of which were considered severe. Of the 40 patients in the Quincke needle group there were eight with PDPH (20%), three of which were considered severe. Despite the lower incidence of headache in the Sprotte needle group, this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), due to the difference in population size. We conclude that the 24 gauge Sprotte needle is associated with a comparatively low but clinically relevant incidence of headache in the obstetric population.

One hundred sciatic nerve blocks: a comparison of localisation techniques.

One hundred sciatic nerve blocks performed for surgery related to lower limb vascular disease were prospectively audited with respect to the techniques used for sciatic nerve localisation and the success rates achieved. Utilising a 22 gauge Quincke point needle, sciatic nerve localisation was performed by initially searching for paraesthesia, followed by the use of a low powered peripheral nerve stimulator. Overall there were 89 successful blocks. Paraesthesia was found in only 44 cases of which 41 were subsequently judged to be successful blocks. A positive response to the nerve stimulator was achieved in 95 cases of which 87 went on to have successful blocks. Our findings suggest that either eliciting paraesthesia or a positive response to the peripheral nerve stimulator carries a high correlation with subsequent successful block, but that the use of the nerve stimulator provides a more consistent and reliable technique for nerve localisation.