Psychophysiological Reactivity in Couples During a Marital Interaction Task.

The ability to regulate our own physiological arousal when dealing with the emotional expression of our partner is crucial for satisfactory and stable intimate relationships. In previous physiological studies of marital interactions, researchers have found greater levels of psychophysiological arousal for members of the couple in conflictual interactions in comparison with positive interactions. Past researchers have established that intense and prolonged autonomic and neuroendocrine arousal during marital conflict can have negative consequences for mental and physical health. In this study we examined the physiological reactivity, as measured by skin conductance level, heart rate and cortisol levels, from both partners during a couple's interaction task consisting of a structured conversation about positive and negative aspects of their relationship. Participants were thirty-two heterosexual couples (N = 64) in a committed monogamous relationship with a minimum duration of one year. We found higher heart rate and cortisol levels during negative interaction condition when compared with the positive condition. Skin conductance was higher in the positive interaction condition, when compared with the negative interaction condition. In addition, we found a significant negative association between heart rate variability and autonomic arousal evoked by the interaction task. The implications of these findings for the effects of marital strain on health as well as for the design of risk-reducing interventions, namely biofeedback are discussed.

Patient preferences for heart failure treatment: utilities are valid measures of health-related quality of life in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Current standards hold that cost-effectiveness analyses should incorporate measures of both quantity and quality of life, and that quality of life in this context is best measured by a utility. We sought to measure utility scores for patients with heart failure and to assess their validity as measures of health-related quality of life (HRQL). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 50 patients with heart failure. We measured utilities with the time trade-off technique, exercise capacity with a 6-minute walk test, and HRQL with the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure questionnaire, the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire, and a visual analogue score. Validity was assessed by establishing correlation between utilities and these other measures. Mean utility score was 0.77 +/- 0.28. There were significant (P < .05) curvilinear relationships between utility score and visual analogue score, the physical function summary scale of the SF-36, 6-minute walk distance, and the Living With Heart Failure score. Utility scores on retest at 1 week were unchanged in a subset of 12 patients. Utilities did not vary systematically with age, sex, or ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Utilities are valid measures of HRQL in patients with heart failure, and cost-effectiveness analyses of heart failure treatments incorporating utilities in the outcome measure can be meaningful.

The use of preoperative computed tomography scanning in total hip arthroplasty.

Computed tomography (CT) scanning is a useful tool in many areas of orthopedics. This prospective study reviews the authors' experience with CT scans in 73 patients studied prior to total hip arthroplasty. The CT scan is valuable in the primary total hip arthroplasty if the radiograph suggests medial, posterior, or superior acetabular wall defects. In some instances, bone grafting or other special procedures are required for the reconstruction of these defects. In the present study, preoperative CT identified an abnormality in 18 cases with deficient acetabular walls, while plain radiographs identified only six of these difficulties. Although important information for planning revision total hip arthroplasties was noted in this series, CT scans are indicated primarily in instances of suspected acetabular wall defects.