Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(2): 129-34, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21356431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that more than 8 million health care workers (HCWs) in the United States may be exposed to blood and body fluids via sharp and mucocutaneous exposures. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed among 505 HCWs. The target sample population included all the medical students; nursing professionals; dental professionals; and residents in internal medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, a metropolitan tertiary care and referral center for Northern Illinois and Northwest Indiana. The sample was limited by the number of HCWs who were available to take the survey. The number and the characteristics of occupational exposures and reporting practices were recorded and compiled. Subsequently, a review of the English literature was performed using PubMed to analyze reasons for underreporting. Secondary and tertiary articles were located based on findings from the initial searches. RESULTS: One hundred three of 455 (22.6%) HCWs reported a sharps exposure during their career, including their student years; thirty-four (33.0%) of these were not reported. One hundred five of 455 (23.1%) HCWs reported a mucocutaneous exposure during their career; 87 (82.9%) of these were not reported. The most common year of exposure was the intern year. The most common reason for not reporting was the belief that the exposure was not significant, followed by the combination of believing the exposure was not significant and being too busy. CONCLUSION: Underreporting of blood and body fluid exposures is common because of a belief that most exposures are not significant. More education of HCWs is needed to change this perspective.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Blood , Body Fluids , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Risk Management/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(9): 854-60, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19637960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We describe our experience using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) during a period of active surveillance in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) from March 2007 until November 2007. OBJECTIVE: To compare PCR with bacterial culture methods and find the screening algorithm that most successfully ensures appropriate isolation of colonized patients. METHODS: Patients in the NICU were screened for MRSA on admission and weekly thereafter until discharge. Healthcare workers (HCWs) were also screened as part of an outbreak investigation. A total of 599 individuals were screened for MRSA with both a PCR assay and selective bacterial culture. Strain typing was performed on all MRSA isolates to determine clonal relatedness. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 435 infants (4.8%) screened positive for MRSA with the PCR assay. Only 11 patients (52.4%) had concomitant bacterial cultures positive for MRSA. Compared to bacterial culture, the PCR assay had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 97.6%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 52.4%. Infants that tested positive for MRSA by both culture and PCR were more likely to have a positive PCR assay result when retested than were those who tested positive by PCR alone (80% vs 20%; P = .02). Strain typing of MRSA isolates identified a common clone in only 2 colonized infants. CONCLUSION: Our data show that, in our neonatal population, the reproducibility of PCR assay results for culture-negative patients was low compared with the reproducibility of results for culture-positive patients. Furthermore, the low PPV suggests that for nearly half of individuals who were PCR-positive, the result was falsely positive, which argues against the use of PCR assays alone for MRSA screening in the NICU.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Population Surveillance/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Chicago/epidemiology , Culture Media , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/microbiology , Male , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 47(1): e1-3, 2008 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18491962

ABSTRACT

We report a case of varicella-zoster vasculopathy that occurred in a 42-year-old renal transplant recipient with concurrent vertebral artery aneurysm and dissection. The patient was successfully treated with embolization and acyclovir therapy. Here, we review the English literature regarding the association of varicella-zoster virus infection with cerebral aneurysm.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster/complications , Herpesvirus 3, Human/isolation & purification , Intracranial Aneurysm/virology , Vertebral Artery/virology , Acyclovir/therapeutic use , Adult , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Embolism/prevention & control , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...