A randomized phase II evaluation of weekly gemcitabine plus pazopanib versus weekly gemcitabine alone in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Angiogenesis inhibition is a valuable strategy for ovarian cancer (EOC). Pazopanib (paz) is a potent small molecular inhibitor of VEGF-1, -2, -3, PDGFR, c-kit, and has activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer. We designed a trial to assess the benefit of adding paz to gemcitabine (gem) in patients with recurrent EOC. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, multi-site, phase 2 trial was conducted (NCT01610206) including patients with platinum resistant or sensitive disease, ≤ 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, and measurable/evaluable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to weekly gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle, with or without paz 800 mg QD, stratified by platinum sensitivity and number of prior lines (1 vs 2 or 3). The primary endpoint was PFS. RESULTS: 148 patients were enrolled 2012-2017. Median age was 63 years (30-82); 60% were platinum resistant; median surveillance was 13 months (0.4-54 months). Median PFS was 5.3 (95% CI, 4.2-5.8) vs 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.1) in the gem arm. The PFS effect was most pronounced in the platinum resistant group (5.32 vs 2.33 months Tarone-Ware p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS. Overall RR (PR 20% vs 11%, Chi-squre p = 0.02) and DCR (80% vs 60%, Chi-square p < 0.001) were higher in the combination. High grade AEs in the combination arm included ≥ Grade 3: hypertension (15%), neutropenia (35%), and thrombocytopenia (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of paz to gem enhanced anti-tumor activity; those with platinum-resistant disease derived the most benefit from combination therapy, even in the setting of receiving prior bevacizumab.

Population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel in patients with varying degrees of liver function: incorporating cytochrome P4503A activity measurements.

The relationship between cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4) activity and docetaxel clearance in patients with varying degrees of liver function (LF) was evaluated. Docetaxel 40, 50, or 75 mg/m(2) was administered to 85 patients with advanced cancer; 23 of 77 evaluable patients had abnormalities in LF tests. Baseline CYP3A activity was assessed using the erythromycin breath test (ERMBT). Pharmacokinetic studies and toxicity assessments were performed during cycle 1 of therapy and population modeling was performed using NONMEM. Docetaxel unbound clearance was lower (317 vs. 470 l/h) and more variable in patients with LF abnormalities compared to patients with normal LF. Covariates evaluated accounted for 83% of variability on clearance in patients with liver dysfunction, with CYP3A4 activity accounting for 47% of variation; covariates accounted for only 23% of variability in patients with normal LF. The clinical utility of the ERMBT may lie in identifying safe docetaxel doses for patients with LF abnormalities.

Primary ovarian cancer chemotherapy: current standards of care.

Chemotherapy has been regarded as standard therapy for the majority of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer for several decades, with this role filled largely by the alkylating agents - used as monotherapy - until the mid-1980s. The activity of cisplatin in this disorder was established during the 1970s, and combinations of cisplatin and an alkylating agent were widely used during the late 1980s. However, further research prompted by continuing concerns over poor survival and tolerability led to the adoption of paclitaxel in combination with either cisplatin or carboplatin as first-line therapy in ovarian cancer during the 1990s. Most recent research has focused on further optimisation of these regimens to maximise clinical benefit while minimising toxicity, and investigations into alternative taxanes (e.g. docetaxel), other novel agents and new treatment schedules are ongoing.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and valspodar (PSC 833) in refractory ovarian carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: A phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel and valspodar (PSC 833) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Valspodar, a nonimmunosuppressive cyclosporine D analogue that reverses P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance, in combination with paclitaxel might be active in paclitaxel-resistant and refractory ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received valspodar 5 mg/kg orally qid x 12 doses. Paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2) intravenously for 3 hours) was administered on day 2, 2 hours after the fifth or sixth dose of valspodar. This treatment was repeated every 21 days. One blood sample was collected before the sixth dose of valspodar for the first three cycles to evaluate valspodar trough concentration. Tumor tissue was obtained from patients for immunohistochemical staining of P-glycoprotein. RESULTS: Of 60 patients entered, 58 were assessable for response. There were five partial responses (8.6%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 3.8 to 20.0; median duration of response, 5.0 months [range, 1.9 to 10.5 months]). Median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (90% CI, 1.4 to 2.4). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities observed were neutropenia, anemia, nausea and vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, and cerebellar ataxia. The trough concentrations of valspodar were > or = 1,000 ng/mL in all but two of 40 patients in the first cycle. Immunohistochemical staining for P-glycoprotein was positive for one of two responding patients. CONCLUSION: Valspodar in combination with paclitaxel has limited activity in patients with paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma. An international randomized clinical trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without valspodar as first-line therapy in advanced ovarian cancer is underway.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a remarkable case.

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is uncommon, and there are few reports of successful long-term therapy. In this case report, a previously healthy preadolescent presented with clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. After progressing through two regimens of chemotherapy, she was given topotecan, which arrested the disease. Nearly 3 years later, she continues to lead a near-normal life as a high school student. Our treatment plan is to continue to administer this therapy at monthly intervals until relapse. Although the achievement of stable disease with topotecan is frequently observed in patients relapsing with epithelial ovarian cancer, durable stable disease in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary is unusual. Treatment--and long-term maintenance therapy--with topotecan may be an option in such patients. In this case, the lack of cumulative toxicities allows the patient to maintain her usual daily activities.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of paclitaxel combined with fixed doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer and other gynecologic malignancies: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this phase I trial was to determine the feasibility of administering a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with advanced endometrial and other gynecologic cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were chemotherapy-naive. Doxorubicin was administered as a brief infusion, paclitaxel for 3 hours, and cisplatin for 60 minutes. Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. For most dose levels, the cisplatin and doxorubicin were fixed at 60 mg/m(2) and 45 mg/m(2), whereas the paclitaxel was escalated in successive cohorts from 90 to 250 mg/m(2). Patients who had received previous radiotherapy to the whole pelvis were escalated separately from those who had not. RESULTS: Eighty patients received 320 cycles of therapy. When G-CSF was not used, myelosuppression prevented escalation beyond the starting dose for patients with or without previous pelvic radiotherapy. When G-CSF was added, neurotoxicity became dose-limiting for both groups. Ten patients were removed from the study for asymptomatic declines in ejection fraction, but no symptomatic congestive heart failure was observed. Major antitumor responses occurred in 46% of patients (six of 13) with measurable endometrial carcinoma and 50% of patients (eight of 16) with measurable cervical carcinoma. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel, doxorubicin, and cisplatin at relevant single-agent doses is active and feasible with the addition of G-CSF. A regimen of cisplatin 60 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2), and paclitaxel 160 mg/m(2) with G-CSF support is recommended for further testing.

Contemporary management of ovarian cancer.

Major advances in treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer have occurred over the last decade, giving hope to patients and families. Surgery remains a cornerstone of therapy. In early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer, a meticulous staging procedure should be performed to aid in determining patients who require appropriate adjuvant therapy and patients who can be monitored. The patient with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer significantly benefits from aggressive cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy, affording the patient higher rates of complete response and partial response. In the new millenium, new therapeutic modalities should enhance the current response rates.

High-dose chemotherapeutic approaches to ovarian cancer management.

The effect of high-dose chemotherapy on the survival of women with ovarian cancer has been studied in numerous clinical trials. Approaches to dose intensity have included high-dose chemotherapy, combination platinum therapies, intraperitoneal therapy, and stem cell-supported high-dose chemotherapy. Taken together, the data demonstrate increased response rates with high-dose regimens, but any survival advantages observed have been limited. Patients with the most favorable outcome are those with low tumor burden and chemotherapy-sensitive tumors. An attempt to study this group of patients in a randomized trial in the United States (Gynecologic Oncology Group Protocol 164) was unsuccessful because of low accrual. Reasons for low accrual included physician bias, patient bias, and lack of third-party payer support. European randomized trials are under way to evaluate high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation as part of initial therapy or as consolidation after initial response to therapy and to compare high-dose chemotherapy with standard-dose chemotherapy. Until results from these trials become available, high-dose therapy remains limited to the clinical trial setting.

Phase I study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and increasing days of prolonged oral etoposide in ovarian, peritoneal, and tubal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: Given the activity of prolonged oral etoposide in platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, a phase I trial was conducted that combined increasing days of oral etoposide therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with ovarian peritoneal and tubal carcinoma to establish a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) given over 3 hours and carboplatin at an area under the curve of 5 were administered on day 1 followed by oral etoposide 50 mg/m(2)/d beginning on day 2. The number of days of etoposide therapy was escalated on the basis of toxicity. Toxicity end points included neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, or grade 3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia during etoposide administration. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Due to hematologic toxicity, the duration of the paclitaxel infusion was decreased to 1 hour for a second stage of accrual. RESULTS: Of 52 patients studied, 29 were in the first stage of accrual. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred with 8 days of oral etoposide, making the MTD six days of therapy. Twenty-three patients were entered into the second stage of accrual. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 12 days of oral etoposide, making the MTD 10 days of therapy. Three patients developed acute myeloid leukemia 16, 27, and 35 months after receiving a cumulative dose of 200 mg/m(2), 1,200 mg/m(2), and 2,400 mg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: One-hour paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide at 50 mg/m(2)/d for 10 days is tolerable without supportive therapy. The leukemogenic potential is cause for concern and precludes its use in chemotherapy-naive ovarian carcinoma.

Topotecan has substantial antitumor activity as first-line salvage therapy in platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is known to be active in recurrent ovarian cancer, but most prior studies have focused on platinum-resistant or refractory populations. This study was undertaken to define the response rate and progression-free interval in platinum-sensitive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and in whom the interval between prior platinum therapy and the initiation of protocol therapy was greater than 6 months were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes daily for 5 days, with this cycle repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were entered onto the study; 47 were assessable for toxicity and 46 for response. The response rate was 33% (two complete responses and 13 partial responses), with a median response duration of 11.2 months. Hematologic toxicity predominated but was manageable in most patients with frequent incorporation of cytokines and RBC and platelet transfusions. Fatigue was reported in 15 patients and resulted in the discontinuation of therapy in five responding patients. CONCLUSION: Topotecan is an active drug in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, with significant but manageable hematologic toxicity. Fatigue is also a common problem that may be dose-limiting in some patients.

Phase I trial of paclitaxel and etoposide for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated doses of intravenous etoposide and paclitaxel for women with previously treated persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 during 24 hours and etoposide 50 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days. The study was designed to escalate first the dose of etoposide, and then the dose of paclitaxel, in successive cohorts of patients. In an attempt to determine whether toxicity was affected by sequence of the drugs, the order of administration of the two drugs was reversed on alternate cycles. The starting doses of paclitaxel (135 mg/m2/24 hours) and etoposide (50 mg/m2/day x 3) caused severe neutropenia even with the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and the trial was amended to administer the paclitaxel during 3 hours. However, this also proved too myelosuppressive without growth factor support. Twenty-one women were treated. A complete response was observed in one of nine patients with measurable disease, and a major decrease in CA-125 was noted in two patients who did not have measurable disease. Because of the severe myelosuppression observed in most patients, dose reduction was often required after the first cycle. The power to detect sequence-dependent variation in toxicity was minimal; however, no large differences were observed. A combination of the usual doses of these drugs will be difficult to administer in patients who have received previous chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Extraovarian granulosa cell tumor.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report a case of extraovarian granulosa cell tumor and to describe its relevance to the histologic origin of granulosa cell tumors and to clinical practice. METHODS: The clinical course and histopathology of the case were reviewed, and a literature search for other reported cases was performed. RESULTS: A 67-year-old woman presented with postmenopausal bleeding and a pelvic mass. Laparotomy revealed a 16-cm mass arising from the right pelvic sidewall, filling the pelvis, and involving the bladder and rectosigmoid colon. Both ovaries appeared normal and were separate from the mass. Pathologic examination revealed granulosa cell tumor. A literature search revealed no recently reported cases of extraovarian granulosa cell tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Granulosa cell tumors can arise in locations other than the ovary and may be derived from the mesenchyme of the genital ridge. Women who have undergone oophorectomy may have the potential to develop granulosa cell tumors.

The Gynecologic Oncology Group experience in ovarian cancer.

Trials performed in the past 15 years by the Gynecologic Oncology Group identified as optimal a platinum/taxane combination as the backbone to treat chemonaive ovarian cancer. Comparison to a triplet adding a third drug to the backbone is least likely to significantly improve outcome, however, of the drugs currently available for addition; doxil, etoposide, gemcitabine, and topotecan; none appears to be any better or worse than was paclitaxel a decade ago. An approach more likely to improve outcome would be to incorporate as many of these "new" drugs as possible using sequential doublets. Some doublets have a better biochemical rationale such as cisplatin and gemcitabine (inhibition of DNA repair) or topotecan and either doxil or etoposide (upregulation of topoisomerase II levels by topotecan followed by a topoisomerase II inhibitor.

Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: 1998 consensus statements.

BACKGROUND: During an international workshop held in September 1998, a group of specialists in the field of ovarian cancer reached consensus on a number of issues with implications for standard practice and for research of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: Five groups of experts considered several issues which included: biologic factors, prognostic factors, surgery, initial chemotherapy, second-line treatment, the use of CA 125, investigational drugs, intra-peritoneal treatment and high-dose chemotherapy. The group attempted to arrive at answers to questions such as: Are there prognostic factors, which help to identify patients who will not do well with current therapy? What is the current best therapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma? What directions should research take in advanced ovarian cancer? These issues were discussed in a plenary meeting. RESULTS: One of the major conclusions drawn by the consensus committee was that in previously untreated advanced ovarian cancer, cisplatin plus paclitaxel has been shown to be superior to previous standard therapy with cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide (level I evidence). However, for many patients, carboplatin plus paclitaxel is a reasonable alternative because of toxicity and convenience considerations. Most participants felt that the benefits in terms of toxicity for the paclitaxel-carboplatin are such that its widespread adoption at this stage is justified. Until mature survival data are available a minority of investigators would recommend continued use of cisplatin plus paclitaxel, specifically for those patients with advanced disease with the best prognostic characteristics. For future clinical research in this area, new end points for randomised clinical trials, together with a new Trials Network, are proposed.

Comparison of standard and CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum or paclitaxel.

PURPOSE: To assess CA-125 as a measure of response in patients treated with paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty-four patients treated with paclitaxel derived from four different trials and 625 patients treated with platinum from two trials were analyzed using precisely defined 50% and 75% reductions in CA-125. The standard and CA-125 response rates to paclitaxel and platinum were compared. In addition, we analyzed individual patient groups in which there was a difference in response according to the two response criteria. RESULTS: Patients with stable disease as determined by standard criteria who were treated with platinum and responded according to CA-125 criteria have an improved median progression-free survival compared with patients with stable disease who did not respond according to CA-125 criteria (10.6 v 4.8 months; P<.001). Standard and CA-125 response rates for patients treated with platinum (58.93% v 61.31%, respectively) and paclitaxel (30.65% v 31.67%, respectively) were very similar, as were rates of false-positive prediction of response by CA-125 (platinum 2.2% and paclitaxel 2.9%). Responders to paclitaxel had a significantly improved progression-free survival compared with non-responders by both standard criteria (median progression-free survival, 6.8 v 2.5 months; P<.001) and CA-125 criteria (median progression-free survival, 6.8 v 3.4 months; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Forassessing activity of therapy for ovarian cancer, these data show that precise 50% or 75% CA-125 response criteria are as sensitive as standard response criteria. We propose that they may be used as a measure of response in lieu of or in addition to standard response criteria in clinical trials involving epithelial ovarian cancer. Sensitivity is maintained whether patients are treated with platinum or paclitaxel.

Pancreatic polypeptide hypersecretion associated with a neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder.

The authors report a case of a suspected pure pancreatic polypeptide-secreting neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder. The tumor was initially interpreted as an adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder, but was found to have a neuroendocrine component after review. The pathology supports the view that a primitive epithelial stem cell can express both epithelial and neuroendocrine characteristics and can differentiate into both an adenocarcinoma and a neuroendocrine carcinoma. Upon recurrence, the tumor produced symptoms due to local growth, but eventually metastasized and led to the death of the patient within 4 years. The patient was treated with chemoembolization followed by the long-acting somatostatin analog octreotide acetate. The high serum level of pancreatic polypeptide may have contributed to cholestasis and cholelithiasis. Earlier measurement of serum hormone levels and identification of high pancreatic polypeptide levels may have suggested the presence of residual tumor and led to closer follow-up, imaging studies, and therapy.