Women's experiences of Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) and of attending a dedicated multi-disciplinary hydration clinic.

PROBLEM: Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy that affects 1-3 % of women and has profound nutritional, physical and psychological consequences. Previous research identified that women with HG report inadequate infrastructure for day case management. INTRODUCTION: A multi-disciplinary HG day case service (IRIS Hydration Clinic) was launched and provides routine care for women with HG in a dedicated unit. The multi-disciplinary team involves midwives, dietitians, obstetricians and perinatal mental health. AIMS: To explore women's experiences of HG and of attending the dedicated clinic. METHODS: Ten interviews were conducted with women who attended the clinic. Data were transcribed and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. FINDINGS: The physical and psychological impact of HG was captured. The appreciation for the dedicated clinic was a common theme, regarding having somewhere specific for treatment rather than ad-hoc treatment. 'Relationships' was a significant theme - women described the benefits of continuity of care and the positive impact of peer support. Areas for improvement were explored, such as expansion and extra sensitivity around some women's issues around weight gain/loss. DISCUSSION: HG causes significant ill-health and its impact remains undervalued. Women had highly positive experiences of attending the dedicated HG clinic. The impact of continuity and individualized care in a day-case setting improved women's experiences of this condition. CONCLUSION: The dedicated HG clinic was highly valued by women experiencing the condition. The IRIS clinic provides much-needed validation for a medical condition with little understanding from the general public or many healthcare professionals.

A prospective pilot study of Dilapan-S compared with Propess for induction of labour at 41+ weeks in nulliparous pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of labour induction has risen worldwide over the past decade, and this may contribute to the rising caesarean delivery rate. The mechanisms for induction of labour are generally divided into two categories: mechanical and pharmacological. AIMS: The objective of this study was to determine if mechanical induction with Dilapan-S is an acceptable, safe method of induction of labour in post-dates uncomplicated nulliparous pregnancy. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective observational pilot study trial. Fifty-two low-risk nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix, scheduled for induction of labour for post-dates ≥ 41 weeks gestation, were offered induction of labour with Dilapan-S or Propess from May 2016 until November 2016. The primary outcomes measured were compliance to study protocol and maternal (infection, hyperstimulation) and neonatal outcomes (Apgar score at birth). The secondary outcome measures included change in Bishop's score and caesarean delivery rate. RESULTS: Compliance to study protocol was 25/26 (96%); it was possible to insert Dilapan-S in all but one woman. There were no differences in maternal and neonatal primary outcomes between the groups. There were no cases in either arm of hyperstimulation with either induction method. No difference between the groups was noted in the caesarean delivery rate nor in the mean change in Bishop's score. CONCLUSIONS: Dilapan-S is an acceptable, safe form of induction of labour in post-dates uncomplicated nulliparous pregnancy. No cases of hyperstimulation were found, and therefore, Dilapan-S may be a suitable option for outpatient induction of labour in low-risk post-dates nulliparas.

The trauma nurse coordinator in England: a survey of demographics, roles and resources.

INTRODUCTION: Following the introduction of the regional trauma system in 2012 the role of the trauma nurse coordinator (TNC) has been rolled out. This study aims to determine the demographic and practice profile of nurses performing the TNC role in England. METHODS: An electronic survey of TNCs across the 18 trauma networks in England was conducted. RESULTS: Fifty-three TNCs responded (62%) to the survey. Seventeen different role titles identified. The majority of TNCs had an emergency or trauma/orthopaedics clinical background. The largest proportion of time spent was clinical (38%). Least amount of time was spent in the education (7%), and research (3%). Nearly a quarter of respondents (23%) had some form of formal research training, nearly half (47%) were assisting others in research. Over half (55%) of respondents felt that they did not have adequate human resources to conduct their role. DISCUSSION: This research has provided baseline information about nurses in the role of TNC, their role titles and domains of the role 18 months after the formal introduction of trauma networks in England. There are some marked similarities and differences in the time spent in the different domains of the role between these findings and those published internationally.