Moral Experiences of Crisis Management in a Child Mental Health Setting: A Participatory Hermeneutic Ethnographic Study.

Restraints and seclusion are routinely used in child mental health settings for conflict and crisis management, but raise significant ethical concerns. Using a participatory hermeneutic ethnographic framework, we studied conflict and crisis management in a child mental health setting offering care to children aged 6-12 years old in Quebec, Canada. The use of this framework allowed for an in-depth examination of the local imaginaries, of what is morally meaningful to the people in the setting, in addition to institutional norms, structures and practices. Data collection involved participant observation, interviews, and documentation review, with an interpretive framework for data analysis. We argue that the prevalent view of children shared by staff members as "incomplete human becomings" led to the adoption and legitimization of authoritative norms, structures and practices guided largely by a behavioral approach, which sometimes led to an increased use of control measures for reasons other than imminent harm. Children experienced these controlling practices as abusive and hindering the development of trusting relationships, which impeded the implementation of more collaborative approaches staff members sought to put in place to prevent the use of control measures. Study results are discussed in light of conceptions of children as moral agents.

Children's moral experiences of crisis management in a child mental health setting.

The experiences of children related to conflict and crisis management in child mental health settings, especially those aged 12 and below, have been rarely studied. This study examined the moral experiences of children related to conflict and crisis management and the related use of restraint and seclusion in a child mental health setting. A 5-month focused ethnography using a participatory hermeneutic framework was conducted in a day hospital programme for children with severe disruptive disorders within a mental health institute. Children considered restraints and seclusion could help them feel safe in certain instances, for example if another child was being aggressive towards them or in exceptional cases to prevent self-injury. However, their own experiences of being restrained were predominantly negative, especially if not knowing the reason for their use, which they then found unfair. Some of the children emphasized the punitive nature of the use of restraints and seclusion, and most children disagreed with these practices when used as a punishment. Children's perspectives also highlighted the limits of the use of a uniform de-escalation approach by the staff to manage crises. Children considered discussing with the staff and developing a relationship with them as more helpful in case of a crisis then the use of a de-escalation approach or coercive strategies.

Developing the Children's Critical Illness Impact Scale: capturing stories from children, parents, and staff.

OBJECTIVE: With the evolution of pediatric critical care medicine has come an awareness of the ethical imperative of healthcare professionals to attend to the psychological sequelae of technologically intensive care. Recent attempts to measure psychological outcomes in these children have been limited. The purpose of this study was to develop a measure of posthospitalization distress, the Children's Critical Illness Impact Scale (CCIIS), for children aged 6-12 yrs following pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization. DESIGN: A measurement development study consisting of two phases: 1) item generation and scale formatting; and 2) item reduction and scale revisions. Items were generated following thematic analysis of qualitative data from focus groups and individual interviews with children, parents, and healthcare professionals. Children reviewed items for interpretability and importance and assessed scaling technique and item presentation; healthcare professionals further evaluated item relevance. SETTING: The pediatric intensive care units of three quaternary care, Canadian pediatric teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Phase 1 included 18 children, 22 parents, and 12 healthcare professionals (n = 52). Phase 2 included eight children and four healthcare professionals (n = 12). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Five key domains were identified in the thematic analyses: worries, fears, friends and family, sense of self, and behaviors. Thirty-six items were initially generated, and subsequent item reduction resulted in 23 items that were retained on the final scale. Items were generally rated extremely relevant and were judged to capture the content area (content validity index = 0.87). The CCIIS was easily understood, and the scaling format worked well. Older children preferred written items, while younger children will require a modified, pictorial version. CONCLUSIONS: The CCIIS is a new self-report measure with demonstrated content validity and specific relevance for young school-aged children following pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization. Valid, accessible, and developmentally appropriate measures are essential to identify high-risk children and, ultimately, promote healthy growth and development.