Diagnostic Yield of CSF Testing in Infants for Disorders of Biogenic Amine Neurotransmitter Metabolism.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Biochemical testing of CSF for neurotransmitter metabolites and their cofactors is often used in the diagnostic evaluation of infants with neurologic disorders but requires an invasive, labor-intensive procedure with many potential sources of error. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic yield of CSF testing for biogenic amines (serotonin, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine) and their cofactors in identifying inborn errors of neurotransmitter metabolism among infants. METHODS: We evaluated all infants aged 1 year or younger who underwent CSF biogenic amine neurotransmitter (CSFNT) testing at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) between 2008 and 2017 in this cross-sectional study. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals who received a diagnostic result from CSFNT testing. Secondary assessments included the proportion of infants who obtained a diagnostic result from other types of diagnostic testing. RESULTS: The cohort included 323 individuals (191 from CHOP and 232 from BCH). The median age at presentation was 110 days (range 36-193). The most common presenting features were seizures (71%), hypotonia (47%), and developmental delay (43%). The diagnostic yield of CSFNT testing was zero. When CSF pyridoxal-5-phosphate level was assayed with CSFNT testing, 1 patient had a diagnostic result. An etiologic diagnosis was identified in 163 patients (50%) of the cohort, with genetic testing having the highest yield (120 individuals, 37%). DISCUSSION: Our findings support the case for deimplementation of CSFNT testing as a standard diagnostic test of etiology in infants aged 1 year or younger presenting with neurologic disorders.

Hospital readmissions in children with new-onset infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To describe inpatient resource use in the 2 years following infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) diagnosis, examine the association between clinical/demographic variables and incidence of readmission, and identify risk factors/reasons for frequent readmissions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of readmissions (scheduled/unscheduled) within the first 2 years following IESS diagnosis, details of readmissions (number/time between rehospitalizations, and length of stay), demographic/clinical variables, and reasons for readmissions were collected. Negative binomial regression analysis evaluated associations between incidence of readmissions (both scheduled/unscheduled and unscheduled alone) and demographic/clinical factors. Logistic regression assessed the risk of having recurrent readmissions (≥5 readmissions). RESULTS: Among 93 (60% males) new-onset IESS patients, there were 394 readmissions (56% scheduled and 44% unscheduled) within 2-years following IESS diagnosis. Mean length of stay was 3.5 days (SD: 5.9). Readmissions occurred in 82 patients (88%) and 37 (40%) experienced ≥5 readmissions. On multivariate regression analysis, readmissions were increased with use of multiple first-line treatments for IESS (P = 0.006), technology assistance (P ≤ 0.001), and multispecialty care (P = 0.01); seizure freedom (P = 0.015) and known etiology (P = 0.011) lowered the incidence of readmissions. Examining unscheduled readmissions separately, increased readmissions occurred with public insurance (P = 0.013), technology use (P ≤ 0.0.001), and multispecialty care (P = 0.013); seizure freedom decreased unscheduled readmissions (P = 0.006). Technology assistance (G-tube, NG tube, VP shunt, and tracheostomy use) increased the odds (P = 0.007) for recurrent readmissions. Reasons for readmissions included EEG monitoring (protocol driven for verification of IESS remission/characterization of events/EEG surveillance/presurgical monitoring) (51%), acute medical issues (21%), and seizure exacerbation (15%). Protocol-driven readmissions declined an estimated 52% following protocol modification during the study. SIGNIFICANCE: In the 2 years following IESS diagnosis, there is substantial inpatient resource use with nearly 40% experiencing ≥5 readmissions (mostly epilepsy related). Since readmissions are increased by intrinsic patient characteristics such as medical complexity (technology use and multispecialty care) or epilepsy-related issues, the preventability of readmissions is uncertain, except for protocol-driven ones.