Parenteral vs oral antibiotics in the prevention of serious bacterial infections in children with Streptococcus pneumoniae occult bacteremia: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parenteral antibiotics are superior to oral antibiotics in preventing serious bacterial infections in children with Streptococcus pneumoniae occult bacteremia. METHODS: Using the MEDLINE database, the English language literature was searched for all publications concerning bacteremia, fever, or Streptococcus pneumoniae from 1966 to January 1, 1997. All nonduplicative studies with a series of children with S. pneumoniae occult bacteremia having both orally treated and parenterally treated groups were reviewed. Children were excluded from individual studies if at the time of their initial evaluation they were immunocompromised, had a serious bacterial infection, underwent a lumbar puncture, or did not receive antibiotics. RESULTS: Only 4 studies met study criteria. From these studies, 511 total cases of S. pneumoniae occult bacteremia were identified. Ten of 290 (3.4%) in the oral group and 5 of 221 (2.3%) in the parenteral antibiotic group developed serious bacterial infections (pooled p-value = 0.467, pooled OR = 1.48; 95% CI, 0.5-4.3). Two patients in the oral group (0.7%) and 2 patients in the parenteral group (0.9%) developed meningitis (pooled p-value = 0.699, pooled OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.1-5.1). CONCLUSION: The rates of serious bacterial infections and meningitis did not differ between children who were treated with oral and parenteral antibiotics. The extremely low rate of complications observed in both groups suggests no clinically significant difference between therapies. A study with >7,500 bacteremic children (or >300,000 febrile children) would be needed to have 80% power to prove parenteral antibiotics are superior to oral antibiotics in preventing serious bacterial infections.

Do oral antibiotics prevent meningitis and serious bacterial infections in children with Streptococcus pneumoniae occult bacteremia? A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether oral antibiotics prevent meningitis and serious bacterial infections in children with Streptococcus pneumoniae occult bacteremia. DATA SOURCES: Using the Medline database, the English-language literature was searched for all publications concerning bacteremia, fever, or S pneumoniae from 1966 to April 1996. STUDY SELECTION: All studies that included a series of children with S pneumoniae occult bacteremia containing orally treated and untreated groups. Children were excluded from individual studies if they were immunocompromised, had a serious bacterial infection, underwent a lumbar puncture, or received parenteral antibiotics. DATA EXTRACTION: Three authors independently reviewed each article to determine the number of eligible children and the outcome of children meeting entry criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eleven of 21 studies were excluded, leaving 10 evaluable studies with 656 total cases of S pneumoniae occult bacteremia identified. Patients who received oral antibiotics had fewer serious bacterial infections than untreated patients (3.3% vs 9.7%; pooled odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.73). Meningitis developed in 3 (0.8%) of 399 children in the oral antibiotic group and 7 (2.7%) of 257 untreated children (pooled odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 2.09). CONCLUSION: Although oral antibiotics modestly decreased the risk of serious bacterial infections in children with S pneumoniae occult bacteremia, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that oral antibiotics prevent meningitis. Published recommendations that oral antibiotics be administered to prevent serious bacterial infections in children with possible S pneumoniae occult bacteremia should be reevaluated in light of the lower risk of sequelae from S pneumoniae occult bacteremia and newer data concerning side effects from treatment.