Should obstetricians see women with normal pregnancies? A multicentre randomised controlled trial of routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives compared with shared care led by obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE: To compare routine antenatal care provided by general practitioners and midwives with obstetrician led shared care. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 51 general practices linked to nine Scottish maternity hospitals. SUBJECTS: 1765 women at low risk of antenatal complications. INTERVENTION: Routine antenatal care by general practitioners and midwives according to a care plan and protocols for managing complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparisons of health service use, indicators of quality of care, and women's satisfaction. RESULTS: Continuity of care was improved for the general practitioner and midwife group as the number of carers was less (median 5 carers v 7 for shared care group, P<0.0001) and the number of routine visits reduced (10.9 v 11.7, P<0.0001). Fewer women in the general practitioner and midwife group had antenatal admissions (27% (222/834) v 32% (266/840), P<0.05), non-attendances (7% (57) v 11% (89), P<0.01) and daycare (12% (102) v 7% (139), P<0.05) but more were referred (49% (406) v 36% (305), P<0.0001). Rates of antenatal diagnoses did not differ except that fewer women in the general practitioner and midwife group had hypertensive disorders (pregnancy induced hypertension, 5% (37) v 8% (70), P<0.01) and fewer had labour induced (18% (149) v 24% (201), P<0.01). Few failures to comply with the care protocol occurred, but more Rhesus negative women in the general practitioner and midwife group did not have an appropriate antibody check (2.5% (20) v 0.4% (3), P<0.0001). Both groups expressed high satisfaction with care (68% (453/663) v 65% (430/656), P=0.5) and acceptability of allocated style of care (93% (618) v 94% (624), P=0.6). Access to hospital support before labour was similar (45% (302) v 48% (312) visited labour rooms before giving birth, P=0.6). CONCLUSION: Routine specialist visits for women initially at low risk of pregnancy complications offer little or no clinical or consumer benefit.

Tailored written invitations for second round breast cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to determine if attendance for second round mammography screening in those sent a tailored letter (that is, making reference to their screening history) is increased compared with those sent a standard letter; secondly, to investigate the acceptability of tailored letters. SETTING: North West Glasgow Breast Screening Centre. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial. RESULTS: Overall attendance was unrelated to whether the women were sent a tailored or standard letter; 60% of those sent the standard letter attended (922/1531) compared with 62% of those sent the tailored letter (956/1552) (chi 2 = 0.61, P = 0.4) (difference 2%; 95% confidence interval -2% to 5%). There were no significant differences in percentage attendance within each of the study subgroups: women who attended previously and received an all clear result, women who attended previously and received a false positive result, women who were invited previously and failed to attend, and women who were previously too young to be invited for screening. However, there was a statistically significant difference in percentage attendance between these four groups, independent of letter type (chi 2 = 510, P < 0.00001). Although women found the letters acceptable and understandable, they did not seem to pay close attention to the content. CONCLUSIONS: Tailoring invitation letters does not have a significant effect on uptake rates for breast screening and does not justify the additional workload required.

Women's views of the Scottish Breast Screening Programme: a national consumer opinion survey.

A questionnaire survey of 3,000 women attending operative Scottish breast screening outlets was conducted to ascertain women's views of the Scottish Breast Screening Programme. The survey aimed to discover women's opinions of waiting areas, staff, changing facilities, screening procedure and intentions about returning for screening in the future. The response rate was 86%. Overall 84% found reception staff very helpful, 98% found undressing instructions clear, waiting areas comfortable and changing areas private enough; 77% thought the radiographers were very understanding; 97% received enough explanation about the mammogram and 96% felt able to ask questions; 89% said the entire screening process was as, or better than expected; 89% said they were very likely to come back in three years' time. At individual outlets up to 33% of women had insufficient information about breast screening prior to attending and up to 17% had to wait more than 20 minutes after their appointment times. Up to 21% felt moderate or severe pain on screening and up to 51% found pressure worse than expected. In conclusion, the Scottish Breast Screening Programme is very acceptable to women but at some outlets the appointments system, information giving and screening pressure needs to be reviewed.

A routine system for monitoring perinatal deaths in Scotland.

Since 1983 the monitoring of perinatal deaths in Scotland has been incorporated into the established data collection system which monitors maternal and child health in Scotland. This paper describes the transition from a research project to the routine system and the extension of the data collection to include paediatric and pathological findings. This information is provided by local co-ordinators in active clinical practice. Baseline data are obtained from the routine maternity discharge document (SMR 2). A summary of the findings for the first 4 years of the study, 1977, 1979, 1980 and 1981 is presented, including information about birthweight and gestation-specific perinatal mortality rates; perinatal mortality rates by time of death in relation to labour and singleton and multiple perinatal mortality rates by the obstetric complication preceding the death.

The Scottish perinatal mortality survey.

Perinatal deaths in single births that occurred in Scotland during 1977 were investigated by case-record analysis. Causes of death were divided into nine categories, an extended version of the Aberdeen classification being used. Out of 1012 single perinatal deaths, 265 were due to fetal abnormality, which in 140 cases was malformation of the central nervous system. Of the 747 normally formed infants, 446 weighed 1500 g or more, of whom 82 died intra partum and 154 were born alive. The largest single cause of death was low birth weight in normally formed babies whose mothers had no complications of pregnancy (302 cases). Of these babies, 103 (34%) were growth-retarded. Rhesus incompatibility (16 deaths) and maternal diabetes (seven deaths) were not major causes of perinatal loss. These results were thought to be valuable in illustrating the main causes of perinatal mortality and directing attention to important issues. Hence a modified version of the study is being continued to see whether yearly audit by regional assessors is a feasible and practical way of monitoring trends in perinatal mortality.

Perinatal deaths: analysis by clinical cause to assess value of induction of labour.

Over the 10 years 1966-75 the rate of induction of labour in the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital has increased from 16-3% of all births. During the same period perinatal mortality fell from 33 to 22 per 1000, mainly because of significantly fewer deaths due to antepartum haemorrhage; trauma; maternal diseases; and unknown causes in mature babies. The reduction in the number of deaths of unknown causes in mature fetuses was achieved by preventing deaths occurring after 40 weeks and was recorded in all age and parity groups. The results suggested that increased use of induction of labour has contributed to the improved perinatal mortality rate.