Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: a systematic review of international guidelines.

The optimal role for primary care in providing follow-up for men with prostate cancer is uncertain. A systematic review of international guidelines was undertaken to help identify key elements of existing models of follow-up care to establish a theoretical basis for evaluating future complex interventions. Many guidelines provide insufficient information to judge the reliability of the recommendations. Although the PSA test remains the cornerstone of follow-up, the diversity of recommendations on the provision of follow-up care reflects the current lack of research evidence on which to base firm conclusions. The review highlights the importance of transparent guideline development procedures and the need for robust primary research to inform future evidence-based models of follow-up care for men with prostate cancer.

Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for treating uncomplicated malaria.

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AQ), and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) are inexpensive drugs, but treatment failure is a problem. Combination therapy may reduce treatment failure. CQ or AQ plus SP are affordable options of combination treatment, but there is debate about their effectiveness. OBJECTIVES: To assess the combination of CQ or AQ plus SP compared with SP alone for first-line treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register (April 2005), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005), LILACS (1982 to April 2005), Science Citation Index (1981 to April 2005), African Index Medicus (1993 to 1998), and reference lists. We also contacted researchers at relevant organizations and a pharmaceutical company. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials in adults or children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria were eligible for inclusion. The main outcomes of interest were total and clinical failure at day 28 follow up and serious adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two people independently applied the inclusion criteria. One author extracted data and another checked them independently. We used relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Twelve trials (2107 participants) met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of five AQ trials (461 participants) showed a statistically significant reduction in total failure at day 28 with the combination therapy (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.91), and meta-analysis of three trials (384 participants) showed a significant reduction in clinical failure at day 28 (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.49). The statistical significance in the total failure analysis was sensitive to losses to follow up. Data from two CQ trials showed no advantage for total failure with combination therapy at day 28. There was no evidence from the included trials of serious adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base is not strong enough to support firm conclusions. The available evidence suggests that AQ plus SP can achieve less treatment failure than SP, but this might depend on existing levels of parasite resistance to the individual drugs.

Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for treating uncomplicated malaria.

BACKGROUND: Amodiaquine and chloroquine give fast relief from malaria symptoms, particularly fever. When used alone in areas where there is some parasite resistance they do not completely clear parasites from the blood in all cases, and so not all patients are cured of infection. The major disadvantage of using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone is that it takes a relatively long time to relieve fever. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of chloroquine or amodiaquine given with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, African Index Medicus and LILACS were searched. Experts in the field and drug companies were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of chloroquine or amodiaquine given with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine compared with either drug alone in adults or children with confirmed uncomplicated falciparum malaria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two people independently applied the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by the reviewer and checked independently by another person. MAIN RESULTS: Seven trials were included (1277 patients in total). Fever clearance time was shortened by combination therapy compared to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone. Parasite clearance at day seven follow-up was not significantly different for chloroquine or amodiaquine treatment with or without sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Parasite clearance at day 28 was better with combination therapy compared to chloroquine or amodiaquine alone, but not significantly better than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone. There was no evidence from the included trials of serious side effects with combination treatment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In areas where chloroquine or amodiaquine are still effective, despite some degree of resistance, using these drugs in combination with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, rather than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone, may make people feel better faster and improve sustained parasites clearance.

Artemisinin derivatives for treating uncomplicated malaria.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin derivatives are a relatively new group of drugs with antimalarial properties. As resistance to other antimalarial drugs continues to increase, artemisinin drugs may be useful alternatives. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of artemisinin drugs for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Lilacs, African Index Medicus; conference abstracts and reference lists of relevant articles. We contacted organisations, researchers in the field and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of artemisinin derivatives, alone or in combination with other antimalarials, compared with standard antimalarial treatments, in adults or children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Only trials where treatment was given by mouth or suppository were included. Comparisons between different artemisinin derivatives and treatment regimens were also included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility and trial quality were assessed and data were extracted independently by the two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-one trials involving over 5000 patients were included. Variation in study design and quality made synthesis of the data problematic. Allocation concealment was adequate in only two trials. Most data were from areas of multidrug resistant falciparum malaria in South East Asia. Compared with standard antimalarial treatments, artemisinin drugs showed fast parasite clearance and high cure rates at follow-up, provided the duration of treatment with artemisinin drugs was adequate. Combination with mefloquine improved sustained parasite clearance and was effective in multidrug resistant areas. When doses were adequate, the combination shortened the duration of treatment. We found no evidence that artemisinin drugs are more harmful than standard treatment drugs over a typical trial period of 28 days. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that artemisinin drugs are effective and safe for treating uncomplicated malaria. There is no evidence from randomised trials that one artemisinin derivative is better than the others. In areas where there is mefloquine resistance, combination therapy with an artemisinin derivative appears to improve sustained parasite clearance compared with either drug alone.

Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for treating uncomplicated malaria.

BACKGROUND: Amodiaquine and chloroquine give fast relief from malaria symptoms, particularly fever. When used alone in areas where there is some parasite resistance they do not completely clear parasites from the blood in all cases, and so not all patients are cured of infection. The major disadvantage of using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone is that it takes a relatively long time to relieve fever. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of chloroquine or amodiaquine given with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine to treat uncomplicated falciparum malaria. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, African Index Medicus and LILACS were searched. Experts in the field and drug companies were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of chloroquine or amodiaquine given with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine compared with either drug alone in adults or children with confirmed uncomplicated falciparum malaria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two people independently applied the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted by the reviewer and checked independently by another person. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials were included. Fever clearance time was reduced by combination therapy compared with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone. Parasite clearance at day seven follow-up was not significantly different for chloroquine or amodiaquine treatment with or without sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Parasite clearance at day 28 was better with combination therapy compared with chloroquine or amodiaquine alone (odds ratio 14.28, 95% confidence interval 6.76 to 30.19), but not significantly better than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone (odds ratio 3.17, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 10.43). There was no evidence from the included trials of serious side effects with combination treatment. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: In areas where chloroquine or amodiaquine are still effective, despite some degree of resistance, using these drugs in combination with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, rather than sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone, may make people feel better faster and improve sustained parasites clearance.

Artemisinin derivatives for treating severe malaria.

BACKGROUND: Artemisinin derivatives may have advantages over quinoline drugs for treating severe malaria since they are fast acting and effective against quinine resistant malaria parasites. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of artemisinin drugs for severe and complicated falciparum malaria in adults and children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Lilacs, African Index Medicus, conference abstracts and reference lists of articles. We contacted organisations, researchers in the field and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and pseudo-randomised trials comparing artemisinin drugs (rectal, intramuscular or intravenous) with standard treatment, or comparisons between artemisinin derivatives in adults or children with severe or complicated falciparum malaria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Eligibility, trial quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty three trials are included, allocation concealment was adequate in nine. Sixteen trials compared artemisinin drugs with quinine in 2653 patients. Artemisinin drugs were associated with better survival (mortality odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.46 to 0.82, random effects model). In trials where concealment of allocation was adequate (2261 patients), this was barely statistically significant (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.96, random effects model). In 1939 patients with cerebral malaria, mortality was also lower with artemisinin drugs overall (odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.88, random effects model). The difference was not significant however when only trials reporting adequate concealment of allocation were analysed (odds ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.10, random effects model) based on 1607 patients. No difference in neurological sequelae was shown. Compared with quinine, artemisinin drugs showed faster parasite clearance from the blood and similar adverse effects. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that artemisinin drugs are no worse than quinine in preventing death in severe or complicated malaria. No artemisinin derivative appears to be better than the others.

Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as a treatment for uncomplicated malaria--a systematic review.

The 4-aminoquinolines, chloroquine or amodiaquine, have long been the drugs of choice for treating uncomplicated, falciparum malaria in Africa, although resistance to them is now common. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the usual alternative when 4-aminoquinoline treatment fails. A combination-treatment regimen could combine the rapid symptom relief offered by the 4-aminoquinolines with the prolonged parasiticidal activity of SP, and also slow down development of resistance to the individual drugs. A systematic review of randomized trials was conducted so that the evidence of effectiveness and safety of such combination treatment could be summarized and compared with the results of treatment with either drug given alone. The results of trials were sought by searching through electronic databases and by contact with researchers in the field. Five studies were identified. Although there are few data, there is evidence that control of clinical symptoms is better when a 4-aminoquinoline is used with SP than when SP is used alone, and the cure rate also tends to be higher with the combination regimen. No evidence of serious side-effects was found. Larger scale trials are needed if this combination is to be adopted more widely.

Treatment of uncomplicated malaria with artemisinin derivatives. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

This systematic review of randomised or pseudorandomised trials was aimed at summarising the effectiveness and safety of artemisinin drugs for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Ninety-three potentially eligible studies were identified and 38 met the inclusion criteria. Most data are from Southeast Asian areas of mefloquine-resistant falciparum malaria, Thailand in particular. Artemisinin drugs achieve high cure rates at follow-up in all endemic areas represented by the studies included provided that the duration of treatment is adequate. Combination with mefloquine improves sustained parasite clearance and is effective in multidrug resistant areas. Provided the dose of both drugs is adequate, the combination can shorten the duration of treatment. There is no evidence from randomised trials that any artemisinin derivative is better than the others. Data from just over 4,300 patients are included for analysis in this review. Despite the large amount of clinical research that has been done, variation in study design, quality and comparisons make synthesis of the data problematic. It is extremely difficult to draw clear conclusions from the existing database.

Treatment of severe malaria with artemisinin derivatives. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

This systematic review of randomised or pseudorandomised trials aimed at summarising the effectiveness and safety of artemisinin drugs for treating severe falciparum malaria in adults and children. Survival was better with artemisinin drugs in 1.265 patients compared with 1.183 treated with quinine (OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.55-0.84). However, the difference is barely significant when only studies with adequate concealment of allocation at enrolment are included in the analysis (OR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98). In 1784 patients with cerebral malaria, mortality was also lower with artemisinin drugs overall (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.90), but not significantly better than quinine in studies reporting adequate concealment of allocation. No difference in neurological sequelae has been demonstrated. Artemisinin drugs clear parasites from the blood faster than quinine. Adverse effects are similarly common with artemisinin drugs and quinine, although reporting varies between trials. There is no evidence from this review that any one artemisinin derivative is better than the others, but comparative studies are few, small and heterogeneous.