"I like being young, active, alive": first-year medical students' attitudes to their own aging.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Senior Mentoring programs have been developed to expose students to older adults, increase knowledge of geriatrics, and prepare them to provide patient-centered care. However, even while participating in a senior mentoring program, health professions students demonstrate discriminatory language toward older adults and the aging process. In fact, research suggests ageist practices occur, intentionally or not, among all health professionals and within all healthcare settings. Senior mentoring programs have primarily focused on improving attitudes about older people. The current study evaluated a different approach to anti-ageism by examining medical students' perceptions of their own aging. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This qualitative, descriptive study explored medical students' beliefs about their own aging at the beginning of their medical education using an open-ended prompt immediately before beginning a Senior Mentoring program. RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified six themes: Biological, Psychological, Social, Spiritual, Neutrality and Ageism. Responses suggest that students enter medical school with a complex view of aging that goes beyond biological considerations. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Understanding that students enter medical school with a multi-faceted view of aging provides an opportunity for future work to explore senior mentoring programs as a way to tap into this complex view of aging by changing the way students think not just about older patients but about aging more broadly, and specifically about themselves as aging individuals.

Creating Interprofessional Readiness to Advance Age-Friendly U.S. Healthcare.

A successful interprofessional faculty development program was transformed into a more clinically focused professional development opportunity for both faculty and clinicians. Discipline-specific geriatric competencies and the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) competencies were aligned to the 4Ms framework. The goal of the resulting program, Creating Interprofessional Readiness for Complex and Aging Adults (CIRCAA), was to advance an age-friendly practice using evidence-based strategies to support wellness and improve health outcomes while also addressing the social determinants of health (SDOH). An interprofessional team employed a multidimensional approach to create age-friendly, person-centered practitioners. In this mixed methods study, questionnaires were disseminated and focus groups were conducted with two cohorts of CIRCAA scholars to determine their ability to incorporate learned evidence-based strategies into their own practice environments. Themes and patterns were identified among transcribed interview recordings. Multiple coders were used to identify themes and patterns and inter-coder reliability was assessed. The findings indicate that participants successfully incorporated age-friendly principles and best practices into their own work environments and escaped the silos of their disciplines through the implementation of their capstone projects. Quantitative data supported qualitative themes and revealed gains in knowledge of critical components of age-friendly healthcare and perceptions of interprofessional collaborative care. These results are discussed within a new conceptual framework for studying the multidimensional complexity of what it means to be age-friendly. Our findings suggest that programs such as CIRCAA have the potential to improve older adults' health by addressing SDOH, advancing age-friendly and patient-centered care, and promoting an interprofessional model of evidence-based practice.