Children in side-impact motor vehicle crashes: seating positions and injury mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe the injury mechanisms of children involved in side-impact car crashes, particularly as these relate to seating position, and to estimate the danger of the near-side seating position. METHODS: A prospective two-center study of children involved in severe car crashes in Canada was conducted as well as a retrospective cohort study of children involved in crashes reported in the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) and the National Automotive Sampling System: Crashworthiness Data System (NASS CDS). RESULTS: Children sitting at the side the car was struck (near-side position) sustained severe head, trunk, and limb injuries. Many of these injuries were attributable to direct intrusion, but some occurred without direct damage to the occupant compartment. Center-seat and far-side occupants had severe injuries only when unrestrained. Injury severity scores were higher for children seated on the near side, and this was statistically significant (p = 0.024) The analysis of Fatality Analysis Reporting System data showed that the risk of fatality was higher for children seated in the near-side position than for those in the center-seat position. The fatality risk ratio was 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-3.07) for restrained children and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.57-2.17) for unrestrained children. Analysis of the NASS-CDS data showed that for restrained children, severe injury (ISS > or = 16) was more common among those on the near side (7 per 1,000 children) than among those in the center seat (2 per 1,000) or on the far-side seat (1 per 1,000) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe injuries to near-side occupants occurred in both the presence and absence of compartment intrusion. A typical pattern of head, chest, and extremity injury similar to that seen among child pedestrians was observed among near-side child occupants in side-impact crashes. The center seat was statistically safer than the near-side seat, particularly for restrained child occupants. Scene information may be useful to trauma teams for the prediction of injury type and location. Avoiding intrusion and preventing the occupant from striking the vehicle wall are both important to side-impact protection for children. Improvement of the vehicle safety cage may protect against intrusion injuries. Seating two child occupants in inboard seating positions may provide additional protection against intrusion injuries, and also may protect against nonintrusion injuries.

Mechanism of injury affects 6-month functional outcome in children hospitalized because of severe injuries.

BACKGROUND: The burden of childhood injury is often described using vital statistics for mortality and hospital admissions as a measure of morbidity. Hospital admissions, however, reflect the process of care and do not directly measure children's functional disability. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of mechanism of injury on the functional outcome 6 months after injury in children in an inpatient trauma unit of a pediatric referral hospital. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 357 children aged 2 to 15 with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 12 was studied to determine the relationship between mechanism of injury (based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision e-code) and functional outcome 6 months after hospital discharge. Wee Functional Independence Measure (WeeFIM) was used to assess functional outcome. Any child with a WeeFIM score less than the maximum (of 126) attainable was classed as requiring assistance, and the relative risk of requiring assistance at 6 months was calculated for each injury mechanism. Poisson regression analysis was used to assess the importance of mechanism of injury, after adjusting for age, gender, ISS, and a primary diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) injury. RESULTS: Mechanism of injury had a significant effect on the functional outcome at 6 months: 72% of pedestrians, 64% of cyclists struck by cars, and 59% of injured motor vehicle occupants required assistance during daily activities. By contrast, only 27% of those injured playing sports and 22% of cyclists injured without motor vehicle involvement required assistance. The relative risk of children requiring assistance was similar with or without adjustment for age, gender, ISS, and CNS injury. CONCLUSION: Mechanism of injury is significantly associated with requiring assistance 6 months postdischarge, even after controlling for age, injury severity, and the presence of a CNS injury. These data are important both when discussing the prognosis for an individual patient and also when considering the population impact of childhood injuries.