Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Phys Med Biol ; 39(11): 2043-58, 1994 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15560009

ABSTRACT

An attenuation-correction method for three-dimensional PET imaging, which obtains attenuation-correction factors from transmission measurements using an uncollimated flood source, is described. This correction is demonstrated for two different phantoms using transmission data acquired with QPET, a rotating imaging system with two planar detectors developed for imaging small volumes. The scatter amplitude in the transmission projections was a maximum of 30%; to obtain accurate attenuation-correction factors the scatter distribution was first calculated and subtracted. The attenuation-corrected emission images for both phantoms indicate that their original uniform amplitudes have been restored. The attenuation correction adds only a small amount of noise to the emission images, as evaluated from the standard deviation over a central region. For the first phantom, with maximum attenuation of 48%, the noise added was 2.6%. The second phantom was attenuated by a maximum of 37%, and 1.9% noise was added. Because the transmission data are smoothed, some artifacts are visible at the edges of the phantom where the correction factors change abruptly within the emission image.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Mathematics , Phantoms, Imaging
2.
Phys Med Biol ; 39(11): 2059-71, 1994 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15560011

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional positron emission tomography admits a significant scatter fraction due to the large aperture of the detectors, and requires accurate scatter subtraction. A scatter-correction method, applicable to both emission and transmission imaging, calculates the projections of the single-scatter distribution, using an approximate image of the source and attenuating object. The scatter background is subtracted in projection space for transmission data and in image space for emission data, yielding corrected attenuation and emission images. The accuracy of this single-scatter distribution is validated for the authors' small imaging system by comparison with Monte Carlo simulations. The correction is demonstrated using transmission and emission data obtained from measurements on the authors' QPET imaging system using two acrylic phantoms. For the transmission data, generated with a flood source, errors of up to 24% in the linear attenuation coefficients resulted with no scatter subtraction, but the correction yielded an accurate value of mu =0.11+or-0.01 cm-1. For the emission data, the corrected images show that the scattered background has been removed to within the level of the background noise outside the source. The residual amplitude within a cold spot in one of the phantoms was reduced from 21% to 3% of the image amplitude.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Positron-Emission Tomography/methods , Monte Carlo Method , Phantoms, Imaging , Scattering, Radiation
3.
Phys Med Biol ; 37(3): 767-77, 1992 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1565702

ABSTRACT

A method to remove the interference between attenuation correction and scatter subtraction has been developed for the QPET 3D imaging system at Queen's University. Because the detector system has more than 10(10) lines of response, we reconstruct the image by first backprojecting, then filtering. We correct for attenuation at backprojection by weighting each event by the inverse of the attenuation factor calculated by reprojection through an attenuation image. Since the scatter background has not been corrected at backprojection time, this has the side effect that a fraction of the detected scattered events get incorrectly weighted. When a scatter subtraction is subsequently applied, the correction is inaccurate because the scatter distribution has been modified by the attenuation correction procedure. The residual interference error in the reconstructed image is a distorted image of the attenuator. An approximation to this error is obtained by reprojecting through the attenuation image, backprojecting with appropriate weights, then reconstructing. This image is then scaled and multiplied by the calculated scatter distribution to obtain an estimate of the interference error. Both simulations and measurements indicate that for our system, this method provides a reasonable approximation of the interference error in the image.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, Emission-Computed/methods , Models, Structural , Scattering, Radiation , Tomography, Emission-Computed/instrumentation
4.
Phys Med Biol ; 36(5): 603-19, 1991 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2068226

ABSTRACT

An accurate attenuation correction has been developed for a small-volume three-dimensional positron emission tomography (PET) system. Transmission data were measured as twenty-four 2D slices which were reconstructed and combined to form a 3D attenuation image. Emission data were reconstructed using a backproject-then-filter technique, and each event was corrected for attenuation at backprojection time by a reprojection through the attenuation image. This correction restores the spatial invariance of the point response function, thus allowing a valid deconvolution and producing an undistorted emission image. Scattering corrections were not applied to either the transmission or the emission data but simulation studies indicated that scattering made only a small contribution to the attenuation measurement. Results are presented for two phantoms, in which transmission scans of 57,500 and 18,700 events/slice were used to correct emission images of 5.2 and 2.8 million events. Although the attenuation images had poor statistical accuracy and a resolution of 13 mm, the method resulted in accurate attenuation-corrected images with no degradation in image resolution (which was 3 mm for the first emission image), and with little effect on image noise.


Subject(s)
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed/methods , Tomography, Emission-Computed/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...