Customized passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses can improve walking economy and speed for many individuals post-stroke.

BACKGROUND: Passive-dynamic ankle-foot orthoses (PD-AFOs) are often prescribed to address plantar flexor weakness during gait, which is commonly observed after stroke. However, limited evidence is available to inform the prescription guidelines of PD-AFO bending stiffness. This study assessed the extent to which PD-AFOs customized to match an individual's level of plantar flexor weakness influence walking function, as compared to No AFO and their standard of care (SOC) AFO. METHODS: Mechanical cost-of-transport, self-selected walking speed, and key biomechanical variables were measured while individuals greater than six months post-stroke walked with No AFO, with their SOC AFO, and with a stiffness-customized PD-AFO. Outcomes were compared across these conditions using a repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman test (depending on normality) for group-level analysis and simulation modeling analysis for individual-level analysis. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed study activities. Mechanical cost-of-transport and self-selected walking speed improved with the stiffness-customized PD-AFOs compared to No AFO and SOC AFO. However, this did not result in a consistent improvement in other biomechanical variables toward typical values. In line with the heterogeneous nature of the post-stroke population, the response to the PD-AFO was highly variable. CONCLUSIONS: Stiffness-customized PD-AFOs can improve the mechanical cost-of-transport and self-selected walking speed in many individuals post-stroke, as compared to No AFO and participants' standard of care AFO. This work provides initial efficacy data for stiffness-customized PD-AFOs in individuals post-stroke and lays the foundation for future studies to enable consistently effective prescription of PD-AFOs for patients post-stroke in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04619043.

Perceptions and experiences of first mobility aid provision for young children with cerebral palsy in the United States: a mixed-methods study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish and understand the provision process and impacts of first mobility aids for children with cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States - specifically orthoses, walkers and gait-trainers. METHODS: We performed a mixed-methods study including surveys and semi-structured interviews of caregivers of young children with CP (n = 10) and clinicians who work with young children with CP (n = 29). We used content analysis for the surveys and inductive coding for the interviews. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: (1) first mobility aids have mixed impacts and use patterns, (2) there is varied caregiver education and understanding about mobility aids, (3) clinician knowledge, consistency and connection impact care and (4) numerous access barriers exist for families, and there are still opportunities for improvement across all domains. CONCLUSIONS: This research provides insights into the lived experiences of clinicians and caregivers of young children with CP regarding the prescription, provision, use and impact of first mobility aids, specifically ankle foot orthoses and walkers/gait trainers. This study not only provides researchers and clinicians with an understanding of the current status of the prescription and provision process in the United States, but also offers suggestions for improvements of the process and mobility aids themselves. These results have implications for future research, mobility aid, design and the provision process of first mobility aids.

Implications for rehabilitationMore detailed education and training during the prescription and early use process of first mobility aids has been highlighted as an unmet need by many families.The current timeline for participants receiving first mobility aids after prescription such as ankle-foot orthoses and walkers ranges from 2 to 9 months, which may delay access to on-time mobility for young children.Clinicians and caregivers highlight benefits of ankle-foot orthoses such as improved gait and standing alignment but also point out these aids can be uncomfortable and inhibit functional floor mobility. Clinicians highlight benefits of walkers such as supporting upright mobility and independence, but also point out challenges with physical barriers in the community and contributions to poor postural habits. Open discussion of these pros and cons with caregivers may be an important part of the provision process.Understanding the impact of different types and levels of clinician education and training regarding first mobility aids on confidence and decision-making during provision processes is valuable to improve practice and device design.