The Impact of Preoperative Stoma Marking on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Comparison Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients receiving preoperative stoma marking by a certified wound, ostomy and continence nurse (CWOCN) to patients who did not receive preoperative marking. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, nonrandomized comparison cohort study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 59 patients immediately following creation of a fecal stoma during an 18-month period between 2008 and 2010. The experimental group consisted of 35 patients with a mean age of 49.7 years who received preoperative stoma site marking by a CWOCN. Six of those 35 patients (17%) received preoperative ostomy education and stoma site marking. The control group consisted of 24 patients with a mean age of 60.1 years who did not receive preoperative stoma site marking or preoperative ostomy education. The study setting was a 500-bed Midwest Magnet-designated teaching hospital. METHODS: Data collection occurred at 2 points: within 72 hours before hospital discharge and 8 weeks after discharge. The Stoma Quality of Life (Stoma-QOL) instrument was used to measure HRQOL. Two CWOCNs and 3 RNs, all members of Memorial's Ostomy & Wound Services, administered the Stoma QOL within 72 hours before hospital discharge. The 2 CWOCNs followed a scripted message to collect functional lifestyle factors and administer the Stoma-QOL, for the second time at 8 weeks after discharge. RESULTS: Groups were compared using analysis of covariance to control for age; analysis demonstrated significantly higher HOQOL in the marked group compared to the unmarked group (F = 4.9, P = .031). CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrated that patients who underwent stoma site marking reported higher HRQOL than those who did not.

WOCN Society and AUA Position Statement on Preoperative Stoma Site Marking for Patients Undergoing Urostomy Surgery.

Marking the optimal location for a stoma preoperatively enhances the likelihood of a patient's independence in stoma care, predictable pouching system wear times, and resumption of normal activities. Urologists and certified ostomy nurses are the optimal clinicians to select and mark stoma sites, as this skill is a part of their education, practice, and training. However, these providers are not always available, particularly in emergency situations. The purpose of this position statement, developed by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society in collaboration with the American Urological Association and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, is to provide a guideline to assist clinicians (especially those who are not surgeons or WOC nurses) in selecting an effective stoma site.

WOCN Society and ASCRS Position Statement on Preoperative Stoma Site Marking for Patients Undergoing Colostomy or Ileostomy Surgery.

Marking the optimal location for a stoma preoperatively enhances the likelihood of a patient's independence in stoma care, predictable pouching system wear times, and resumption of normal activities. Colon and rectal surgeons and certified ostomy nurses are the optimal clinicians to select and mark stoma sites, as this skill is a part of their education, practice, and training. However, these providers are not always available, particularly in emergency situations. The purpose of this position statement, developed by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society in collaboration with the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the American Urological Association, is to provide a guideline to assist clinicians (especially those who are not surgeons or WOC nurses) in selecting an effective stoma site.

Prevention of nosocomial pressure ulcers: a process improvement project.

Nosocomial pressure ulcers (PU) occur in approximately 12% of all hospitalized patients. The risk can be determined by a variety of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. As a first line of defense against nosocomial PU, we use the Braden Scale to determine the potential risk of PU development during hospitalization. Once risk was identified, our standard was to implement an individualized plan of care. However, consistent implementation of PU preventative measures was lacking. As a result, a process improvement project was developed and implemented. The purpose of this process improvement project was to increase communication about and awareness of the need to vigorously intervene and document whenever there is risk of, or development of, a nosocomial PU. By initiating consistent use of a PU Tracking Form, developing unit-based wound champions that serve as experts in ulcer prevention, and creating an individual case analysis process, PU prevention and tracking was institutionalized. Results indicate that our nosocomial PU rate has declined from 7% to 4%.

Modern management of nonneurologic pediatric incontinence.

Incontinence affects 20%-30% of children. Historically, evaluation of voiding problems in children has involved complete urodynamic studies and treatment based primarily on bladder findings and anticholinergic medications. Unfortunately, success with this approach has been poor. This article describes new advances in our understanding of the causes of nonneurologic pediatric incontinence and its associated problems and provides new treatment strategies to manage these patients. A strategy incorporating an escalating approach to evaluation and treatment is the cornerstone of this approach. Minimizing the routine use of invasive studies and medication is the result.